- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Wed 23rd November 2005

Day Of Reckoning

Filed under: General, Law & Courts — Paul Catton @ 10:01 pm

Tomorrow, 10.00am Sentencing is to be passed upon me by Lisa Tremewen at the Waitakere District Court, Auckland.
This stems from a conviction in May by Judge Tremewen on a count of assault and a breach of a protection order.

The assault and breach occurred when my ex-spouse and one of my sons (middle -16 year old) forced their way into my home, assaulted me and traumatised my niece.
A third protected person (my ex-mother in law) arrived on the scene and I was further assaulted by her.

I retaliated in self defence as my son assaulted me again on the driveway.

That’s when the Police arrived (forty minutes after my first emergency 111 call).

I was arrested, and my neice and I were taken to Henderson Police station where she was ripped screaming from my arms (she had been placed by CYFS in my care).
It was for her removal that I believe this incident had been orchestrated, it worked.

I would like to give thanks for the support that my friends in the collective of the Men’s Coalition have given while I have had to endure this living nightmare.

On Saturday 26th attend and make the Grey Lynn Festival a major spearhead into redressing the imbalance that face men and fathers through the Feminazism policies that are rampantly destroying families and children.

“And now behold, I say unto you that the foundation of the destruction of this people is beginning to be laid by the unrighteousness of you lawyers and you judges” ALMA 10-27

P.S Jim would like a bit of company at the Waitakere Court tomorrow on the grassy knoll if you able to manage an hour.

4 Comments »

  1. In response to your situation I support you, and yes the “system” does have a one directional, one attitude and one way to parent atmosphere, all unhealthy and not in the interest of the child. My ex last DEcember arranged with 5 of her friends including the police to break through 2 windows of the family home and removed every last piece of connection to my children and furniture and effects. She had 3 months prior to this after leaving the house with the children (aged 3 and 6) consented to my occupation in an affidavit to the family court.
    She left when a neighbour complained that she could not be there.
    I laid a compalint with the Police, they did nothing “its a domestic matter”, although they provided assistance at the break-in to keep the peace - although I was in town.
    Judge Moss supported this break-in on grounds that the children needed toys over christmas but was totally silent on the ex taking $20,000 worth of property from the home including items owned and lent to me from friends. The toys were enough for contact sessions, when the ex had left she had taken 60% of the toys and a month later I had given another 20% for the children. Her break-in was psychologically abusive. But unseen as such by the “system”. I am currently in appeal at the High Court on these and other matters. I suggest you get a forensic clinical psychologist to look at your case and determine that the cause was to braek up your relationship with your child.

    I am about engage a forensic psychologist in Auckland to assist my case in the high court he is Glynn Owens at Auckland University.

    Comment by vision — Thu 24th November 2005 @ 6:06 am

  2. You poor sod.

    All I can say is best of luck.

    Having myself been cleaned out by the femi-nazi
    (never had to lift a finger, no violence, no police, no protection order, no evidence of abuse, psych report declearing me a low risk etc etc, etc)
    I was simply labeled controlling and rigid, and not fit to be unsupervised with my kid.
    I could talk for hours, but now’s not the time.

    Again - best of luck …

    Comment by Al D Rado — Thu 24th November 2005 @ 8:14 am

  3. Paul, if it is support you are wanting, sorry none forthcoming. You are fully aware of the ‘inhuman’ things you have been guilty of when it comes to your family (usually under the influence of addictive substances) For a 12year old to write such things as not wanting to see her father again, that is serious, she did not approve of the way you unkindly treated your ex wife (your daughter’s mother),
    I understand you have acted uncontrollaby in previous courts, that maybe sums you up, OUT OF CONTROL if you cannot be in control.

    Comment by Sally Wise — Mon 3rd April 2006 @ 11:11 pm

  4. It is understandable why alot of anger and frustration happens when dealing with the family court as they are bias toward fathers. The children are only a part of the process the main interest seems to go with the women involved. They don’t really take into account the approach the men are also good fathers and the children need contact with them. There is little recognistion of the misconduct and behavour of women in a separation and they are protected by the court. Even when fathers are primary carers they are mistreated and the mother can misbehave. Are there other fathers that are primary carers that have faced similar problems with the family court process.

    Comment by Mike — Tue 15th August 2006 @ 11:34 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting

Powered by WordPress