- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Mon 13th June 2005

Sidelined partners cashing in

Filed under: General,Law & Courts — JohnPotter @ 2:37 pm

Women who put their careers on hold to raise children or support their partner’s career are getting bigger payouts when they separate.

Changes to property laws in 2002 allow men and women to sue estranged partners for lost earning potential as a result of being in a relationship. So far most payments have been made to women.

Payouts are lumped on top of the 50-50 split of property and child maintenance responsibilities.

Law Society family law section chairman Simon Maude said that when changes to the act came into effect, courts conservative with compensation amounts.

That changed last July when a man was ordered to pay $142,000 to his ex-wife. The court recognised the woman’s 20-year career break while raising their two children.

Maude believes the $142,000 will be exceeded in future awards. He said compensation was not only awarded in cases when a partner had made sacrifices to raise children, but when couples decided on a lifestyle that would reduce the income of one partner in a relationship.

Canterbury University senior law lecturer John Caldwell said a huge number of cases were going through Family Court, and courts were struggling to determine compensation figures to reflect what was lost.

Claims were dealt with on case-by-case because there was no range of set tariffs for a court to refer to when awarding a payout.

Caldwell said some men had used the new law to seek compensation after giving up their career to become househusbands.

Maude said the law change also affected how trusts or companies were treated when a relationship ended. Before the law change, it was difficult for a partner to gain equity when assets were transferred into a trust or company structure by the other partner.

He said some lawyers were now trying to have courts determine that any interest in a trust should be classified as property, which would make it easier for an estranged partner to seek compensation.

2 Responses to “Sidelined partners cashing in”

  1. Bryan Norton says:

    Any man who wishes to become a father will in the future require a lobotomy. One would have to be brainless to enter parenthood when quite likely the end result is both alienation from your children and financial destruction. Thank Christ we have Asians who are willing to immigrate to NZ or else the country will be empty in 25yrs.

  2. Stephen says:

    Hi Bryant,
    When Asians I’ve met here in Korea, Japan, China and Thailand ask me what it’s like in NZ and I tell them it’s very beautiful countryside but socially………………
    they often seem to loose enthusiasm for going to NZ. Funny thing that!!

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

Since May 2016 this site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

« »

Powered by WordPress

Skip to toolbar