Comments on: No Fathers’ & Men’s Lawyers Are Allowed In New Zealand?

By: stan

stan — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:05:08 +0000

the more you give a woman… the less she thinks she has… and the more she grabs…
that is the law of woman nature…this is in todays world known as womans rights…
no longer will you find one who will sacrifice for the good of the family…only for self… when a male makes a stand against it or when someone stands for fathers and mens rights he is penalised.

ethics say ‘discrimination’ …. a woman would probably say… ‘ i think not’… and the males are branded as never being able to understand a womans mind…

By: Bevan Berg

Bevan Berg — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:30:41 +0000

The basis of this behaviour is that a women’s mind is a legal entity and yours is not. Your opinion doesn’t count. These people do not think in terms of matriarchal society, they think in terms of gynecocracy. You don’t factor in the decision making process. You may think their behaviour abhorrent, however in their mind they have acted correctly and legally. Until New Zealanders understand what they are voting for, individually more and more men will meet the face of this regime, without finding any accountability, or redress. You will never defeat them in their courts. Freedom will always be the vain dream of men who lack the virility to kill the tyrants of irrational control, and challenge the selfishness of what is ultimately the epitome of social self defeat.

By: Aard V Atheian

Aard V Atheian — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:01:52 +0000

History will judge you harshly if you continue this newfound way to enslave your own citizens. This could well happen in your lifetime.
In an internet age this is not too far fetched.
Do it now before it’s too late, before you or your children will regret it.
Before your own children will renounce you for the depravity that you so blithely exercising today in your ironic practice of Justice.

I say restore Peter Zohrab to his rightful position of practicing lawyers of New Zealand.
Do it now or live with its consequences forever.

By: dpex

dpex — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:03:31 +0000

Allow me to put my hand up as a financial contributor to a fighting fund to help Peter Zohrab.

John, is there any chance you can get and post a copy of the WDLS’s decision?

Cheers
David.

By: Peter Burns

Peter Burns — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:48:37 +0000

library@crownlaw.govt.nz
Our Prime Minister cannot defend the indefensible, that is, Peter Zohrab is the victim of unlawful gender discrimination - as it is a well know fact that the judicial system is influenced by hateful feminazi’s. I have produced overwhelming evidence that the bias experts were wrong in proceedings brought against the Prime Minister and others for malicious gender discrimination - however the evil one got it struck out and the Crown was awarded costs. Over my dead body will I pay the corrupt scum one bloody cent, ref.- Human Rights Review Tribunal decision HRRT 028 /2005! You be warned if you deny Mr Zohrab his fundamental right to practise law you are opening yourself for huge litigation covered under the International Human Rights. Think hard – does Helengard & your dishonest law society really want to have to explain to the International Court of Justice in The Hague ( dreams are free) Oh that’s right our dishonest low life PM can do anything as she has proved to us all she is above the law - however the fact is the judiciary is supposed (lol) to act independently from the executive. Ask MP Nick Smith about that !!!!!! If a complainant can prove that a political view has shown prejudice then you open the door for a big time class action lawsuit on behalf of all parents that Mr Zohrab is assisting. We eagerly await your learned decision. Just remember all Miss Clark has no values or morals where as Mr Zohrab has shown many that he is a credible person trying to address the many problem’s men face when confronted by a unfair system. If you fail as a law society to fulfil the obligation to be impartial and fair - then it simply underlines the need for a full public inquiry ??? For too long now judicial immunity has been based on the average citizen not knowing their rights and therefore the people who do, can not have their rights either.
Stop the prejudice and corruption for the sake of so many good parents and sad children.
dad4justice

By: julie

julie — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 06:24:35 +0000

Sorry John, I see it. (Post from scrap)

By: julie

julie — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 06:02:55 +0000

John, What happened to scraps post about Good Morning New Zealand?

By: Jim Bailey

Jim Bailey — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:33:25 +0000

Sent: Friday, 24 March 2006 4:31 p.m.
To: ‘library@crownlaw.govt.nz’
Subject: Lawyer application

Dear Madam / Sir,
I wish it to be known that I am against the recent decision in a landmark case in which our woman Prime Minister of New Zealand will be faced with dismissing a properly certified lawyer applicant after being turned down by the Wellington District Law Society for his activist work on the behalf of the father’s & men’s right work.
It is relevant to raise the issue of the broader context, which is the apparent inability of many men and fathers to find lawyers who take a sufficiently pro-men stance.
I will be watching this case closely with much interest, as will men’s and father’s rights activists world-wide.
Sincerely Yours,
Jim Bailey
http://www.HandsOnEqualParent.org.nz

By: Stephen

Stephen — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:50:49 +0000

To: library@crownlaw.govt.nz
Subject: Lawyer application

Dear Madam / Sir,

I wish it to be known that I am against the recent decision in a landmark case in which our woman Prime Minister of New Zealand will be faced with dismissing a properly certified lawyer applicant after being turned down by the Wellington District Law Society for his activist work on the behalf of the father’s & men’s right work.

It is relevant to raise the issue of the broader context, which is the apparent inability of many men and fathers to find lawyers who take a sufficiently pro-men stance.

I will be watching this case closely with much interest, as will men’s and father’s rights activists world-wide.

Sincerely Yours,

Stephen Gee.