<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NZ Family Violence Clearinghouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/</link>
	<description>- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 07:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intrepid</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/#comment-105133</link>
		<dc:creator>Intrepid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/#comment-105133</guid>
		<description>They have squarely wrapped themselves in the child, and will come into all discussions as the true defender of the child, and therefore all they may wish to do will be pure, as everyone else will be placed in the position of attacking the child defender. This rhetoric is dishonorable, for they put forth not hard nosed positions, but slogans that none can disagree with. 

Motherhood, apple pie and wrapping yourself in the flag has turned into Feminism, fear from everything is OK and wrapping yourself in the child. Have we advanced from the dreaded past or have some merely change slogans to do the same kind of social engineering without any real evaluation of the last few deacades of high rhetoric. Don't ask them, for to ask them is to attack the "Child Defender", which means you are bad, bad and angry white male material. Very bad ground to start any 5 minute clip on the tube with, and you are surely bound to put off the generation that doesn't like hard nosed debates on logical facts.

 What are the cold facts in total, compared to feelings, happy talk and narrow stats with a agenda between the lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have squarely wrapped themselves in the child, and will come into all discussions as the true defender of the child, and therefore all they may wish to do will be pure, as everyone else will be placed in the position of attacking the child defender. This rhetoric is dishonorable, for they put forth not hard nosed positions, but slogans that none can disagree with. </p>
<p>Motherhood, apple pie and wrapping yourself in the flag has turned into Feminism, fear from everything is OK and wrapping yourself in the child. Have we advanced from the dreaded past or have some merely change slogans to do the same kind of social engineering without any real evaluation of the last few deacades of high rhetoric. Don&#8217;t ask them, for to ask them is to attack the &#8220;Child Defender&#8221;, which means you are bad, bad and angry white male material. Very bad ground to start any 5 minute clip on the tube with, and you are surely bound to put off the generation that doesn&#8217;t like hard nosed debates on logical facts.</p>
<p> What are the cold facts in total, compared to feelings, happy talk and narrow stats with a agenda between the lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/#comment-105100</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/#comment-105100</guid>
		<description>Good question Alastair.
I wonder if it will also include research into men's experience of protection orders too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Alastair.<br />
I wonder if it will also include research into men&#8217;s experience of protection orders too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/#comment-105099</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2006/nz-family-violence-clearinghouse/#comment-105099</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this clearing house will include any members of the fathers coalition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this clearing house will include any members of the fathers coalition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
