- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Mon 25th September 2006

The Donkin Method

Filed under: General — Scrap_The_CSA @ 9:22 pm

The Donkin Method ( A summary)

The Donkin Method for Child Support calculations is designed to provide a solution to the question of how a fair and reasonable child support system can be attained.

There is little doubt that the best outcome for children occurs when mum and dad share the responsibilities of parenting.

Shared parenting is best for kids.When separation of the parents occurs there is no reason why parent s should not be able to continue sharing the parenting of children.(1) Looking from the children’s perspective there is no reason why they should not continue to have both mum and dad parenting them.

It is a parents right to equally parent a child and a childs right to be parented by both parents.

The principle of equal parental responsibility is the basis of the Donkin Method of Child Support.

It is neither parent’s responsibility to support the other financially. It is each parent’s responsibility to support the children.

The level of support is based on the essential needs of children.

Number of children / Essential Needs
1/ 5200
2/ 7200
3 or More / 10000

These figures are examples only.(2)

The amount of child support payable is the equal responsibility of both parents.

Number of children /Essential Needs /Parent 1 /Parent 2
1 /5200 /2600 /2600
2 /7200 /3600 /3600
3 or More /10000 /5200 /5200

Each day is divided in two periods. AM/PM

For parents who equally share care no child support is payable by either parent.

Period/
Day /Mo/Tu/We/Th/Fr/Sa/Su
AM P1 P1 P1 P1 P2 P2 P2
PM P1 P1 P1 P2 P2 P2 P2

For parents who choose to enter into a negotiated agreement to vary their shared care arrangement, because it is best for the children, ,payment of support is calculated as follows. (Where private support agreement between parents cannot be reached.If parents work support issues out among themselves there is no need for State involvement.)

For example Parent 1 has the 1 child Monday to Friday and Parent 2 has the children Saturday and Sunday

Period/
Day /Mo/Tu/We/Th/Fr/Sa/Su
AM P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P2 P2
PM P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P2 P2

1. Support Payable per AM/PM period is $7.13

2. Number of periods in care of Parent 1 is 10

3. Support payable to parent 1 is $71.30

4. Number of periods in care of Parent 2 is 4

5. Support payable to parent 2 is $28.52

6. Offset results in payment of $ 42.78 to parent 1

Exclusions

This method is not designed to cope with those paying parents who are who are beneficiaries or low income earners.

(1) Note — It is accepted that in a very small number of cases that some mums and dads will be unfit to parent their children. This very small percentage of parents should not be seen as a reason to the very large percentage of mums and dads who are good parents.
(2) The figures used in the illustrations are taken from the living allowance given in the Child Support Act 1991

Regards

Scrap

Note

This is the model being advocated by Parents for Children

Parents for Children

Parents for Children is a national organisation seeking legislative change to enable parents who have separated to continue parenting and supporting their children.
This requires:
1.Presumptive shared parenting
2. A fair and reasonable child support system

3 Responses to “The Donkin Method”

  1. Jim Bailey says:

    James,

    Looks good to me – Any changes that encourage the “Equal” Parenting of our Children would be better for them.

    Their Parents residing together or not.

    It bothers me that even this Donkin system that seems so good is complex enough to allow the Femi-Fascists loopholes and other narcissists such as lawyers.

    Can it be simplified further without losing its powerful message to those of us who are converted?

    Onward – JimBWarrior

  2. julie says:

    Hi Scrap,

    I think this is great stuff and a big start for a solution.

    Yet, at the moment I am trying to put the problem to paper so that I can send out a brochure (A4 paper with writing both sides folded in 3) to other groups and around the areas.

    Can you help me, please? Anything will help as I think I have figured out a fair bit of it.

    julie_mtw@hotmail.co.nz

  3. julie says:

    Scrap,

    email is julie_mtw@hotmail (forgot the underline)

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

Since May 2016 this site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

« »

Powered by WordPress

Skip to toolbar