Comments on: Feminist of N.O.W in action http://menz.org.nz/2007/board-member-of-now/ - promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience - Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:10:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: NZ Single Parents Trust » Introduction to MISANDRY - meaning - HATRED OF MEN http://menz.org.nz/2007/board-member-of-now/comment-page-1/#comment-126556 NZ Single Parents Trust » Introduction to MISANDRY - meaning - HATRED OF MEN Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:05:23 +0000 http://menz.org.nz/2007/board-member-of-now/#comment-126556 [...] here is another feminist that has spoken up. This one from the most powerful feminist group in the world besides the United [...] [...] here is another feminist that has spoken up. This one from the most powerful feminist group in the world besides the United [...]

]]> By: Benjamin Easton http://menz.org.nz/2007/board-member-of-now/comment-page-1/#comment-125800 Benjamin Easton Tue, 09 Oct 2007 03:57:10 +0000 http://menz.org.nz/2007/board-member-of-now/#comment-125800 If power bodies can exercise such influence that they can successfully distract an audience away from negative criticism that accuses them of an abuse of that power, then logically the only efficient way to disengage that abuse of influence is to allow the criticism to stay engaged by directly confronting that distraction? In order to do this on equal (or socially equitable terms), women themselves would have to confront and challenge how (and do) they abuse their sexuality. Until women take account themselves and challenge to an effect their gender's abuse by way of their sexual differences with men, there will never be an equal footing: and we societally will just keep on using methods of distraction to disadvantage men. Most respectfully, Benjamin Easton. If power bodies can exercise such influence that they can successfully distract an audience away from negative criticism that accuses them of an abuse of that power, then logically the only efficient way to disengage that abuse of influence is to allow the criticism to stay engaged by directly confronting that distraction?

In order to do this on equal (or socially equitable terms), women themselves would have to confront and challenge how (and do) they abuse their sexuality. Until women take account themselves and challenge to an effect their gender’s abuse by way of their sexual differences with men, there will never be an equal footing: and we societally will just keep on using methods of distraction to disadvantage men.

Most respectfully,
Benjamin Easton.

]]> By: Trudy W. Schuett http://menz.org.nz/2007/board-member-of-now/comment-page-1/#comment-125780 Trudy W. Schuett Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:15:52 +0000 http://menz.org.nz/2007/board-member-of-now/#comment-125780 I've shared a podium with Warren Farrell, and he is above all a decent guy. His story gets even worse, as he's had to defend himself against feminists' charges of pedophilia for years due to a <strong>typographical error</strong> in a magazine article he once wrote. I’ve shared a podium with Warren Farrell, and he is above all a decent guy. His story gets even worse, as he’s had to defend himself against feminists’ charges of pedophilia for years due to a typographical error in a magazine article he once wrote.

]]>