I suppose that i am lucky to have her out of my life, to no longer have the violence, the addiction to her false charm and sexuality

It is not the personal trauma of relationship failure that has changed my life so drastically, it is the trauma of being abused by the state and the great great injustice of what i faced and having all your words digested, turned upside down and ultimately ignored. You expect justice, that right should prevail in an Anglo-Saxon country, but all you get is , well, what the Jews would have got in Nazi German courts in the 30s

The number of males murdered by women has dropped more than the number of females murdered by men since “Domestic Violence” laws were brought in.
This was not due to calming of these sweet ladies made of sugar and spice.

NO, the reason is because, violent women like my wife now have an alternative to murder, they can now just pick up the phone and call the police to get the husband thrown out of their life. They can cause even more longlasting mentally cruelty this way too ! Murder is no longer necessary.

But a violent woman will NEVER change.If her next partner ever retaliates, she will kill him ! I predict this, Claire Rudasingwa NOW living in Brussels, Belgium, will kill her next husband. I TOLD YOU SO, google this one day !!!!!

I went to the police and they only believed her and told me that “In NZ Domestic Violence is done by the man”, although it was me who was attacked. I had paper police statements of her previous violence. But all she had to do was lie and say that it was me who had been violent, i could have easily been arrested myself, as 20% of men are.

No Solicitors

For starters, there is a “conflict of inrerest” upon the issue of every Protection Order as a lawyer / legal firm only has financial interests when preparing a Protection Order. How more corrupt can you get i ask ???

I believe that a hospital / doctor should be the only authority to support the weight of evidence for the issuance of a Protection Order, even if it requires that a lawyer (on salary) have his own office in each of the nations leading hospitals.

These Protection Orders are handed out like toilet paper every time a lawyer or family court jugde needs to do a shit, fuck the lawyers and fuck the judges who are part of this corrupt family court industry, you filthy theiving bastards.

Is nothing sacred ?

I had this view myself, before I had met the familycaught “judges” in person.

OK, so I was convicted of a speeding offense, by the perjury of a traffic policeman. I was guilty. No great injustice, worth complaining about. So I lazily assumed that most convictions gained by perjury, were probably justified anyway.

The trouble is, when you lower standards of proof, or in a dull and stupid manner, allow convictions to proceed with no other “evidence” than sympathy and an accusation, then there will be large numbers of false convictions.

When these wrongful convictions result in severe family damage, such as for Arthur Allan Thomas, or Walter Bolton, 18 February 1957 and now hundreds of thousands of other examples too, then we are seriously damaging our own society.

It is very important to actively check for conflicts of interest, in our “judicial” process. The present “trust us” mantra, is an obvious cloak for skullduggery and judicial murder. Achieving quality starts with operating working systems of accountability, not just paying the Judicial Complaints Hider (JCC) a salary, irrespective of the quality of his “work”, or lack thereof.

Many people oppose the Government paying damages for wrongful conviction and incarceration. However, doing this helps to make the social costs obvious and therefore easier to manage. As these costs escalate and become expensive to taxpayers, then there is constructive pressure to set and apply standards for all legal workers, in particular for judges.

There must be many wrongful convictions that never become obvious to the public. The DNA exonerations is one of the few examples where new forensic techniques allows the resolution of some old cases. This then gives a MINIMUM estimate of the proportion of wrongful convictions.

It does make a case for setting minimum standards for judges training and standards of integrity. At present, our “judges” are “all care and no responsibility”. Their role is more of theatre/clown - someone is hanged or jailed and the public aren’t too concerned about who! It seems that the clothes matter more than the man.

The european standard that people who have worked for over 12 months as a lawyer, are ineligible to enter judicial training, in my opinion is essential as part of setting integrity and ethical standards for judges.

It is only if the series of rapes continues unabated after the jailing, that a search for further people to incarcerate is started again.

Improvements will come from:
1. Listening to the evidence
2. Having the necessary skills to understand and evaluate evidence
3. Approaching these tasks with an open mind

None of these ideas is new, they have been described for thousands of years.

There is quite a lot of value to society in incarcerating the right people.
Lets start with some of our present “judges”.

The “profession” that doesn’t set performance or quality standards and fights against allowing its members to be subject to penalties for unethical or incompetent conduct, coincidentally is the “profession” that is developing it’s standards the slowest of any! The solution is pretty obvious!

Cheers, MurrayBacon.

It is the same as the old turkish police method of torturing 1000 people to find out the 1 real offender , but women never really understand “statistics”. because they never think that they are wrong, do they ?

There might value in noticing individuals as well as the averages. I married an individual woman and since then I have been pleased that I didn’t marry the average woman. Its just not possible to divorce an average woman, only an individual.

“Jane” sounds awfully average. Cheers, MurrayBacon (1 of 6,000 per year…)