<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What They Are Saying&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/</link>
	<description>- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  8 Jan 2009 00:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/#comment-115413</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/#comment-115413</guid>
		<description>Hello Hans. very interesting. Wendy Davis is I believe the lawyer in the women's only law busines that only takes female clients. Does anyone know if thats right? they handle such things as 'drive by stalkings'. It sounds very serious, much like a drive by shooting.

It may involve a man driving past the home of his former wife on the way to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Hans. very interesting. Wendy Davis is I believe the lawyer in the women&#8217;s only law busines that only takes female clients. Does anyone know if thats right? they handle such things as &#8216;drive by stalkings&#8217;. It sounds very serious, much like a drive by shooting.</p>
<p>It may involve a man driving past the home of his former wife on the way to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stryder</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/#comment-115259</link>
		<dc:creator>stryder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/#comment-115259</guid>
		<description>gender this...
Check this out…
Hubby and wifey both commit the same crime but look at the findings… http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/father-jailed-for-sleeping-pill-murder-plot/2007/03/13/1173722454283.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gender this&#8230;<br />
Check this out…<br />
Hubby and wifey both commit the same crime but look at the findings… <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/father-jailed-for-sleeping-pill-murder-plot/2007/03/13/1173722454283.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/father-jailed-for-sleeping-pill-murder-plot/2007/03/13/1173722454283.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nicolle</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/#comment-115249</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Nicolle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2007/what-they-are-saying/#comment-115249</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The focus must be brought back to gendered nature of this violence. If we fail to recognise the dynamics of power behind domestic violence we have little chance of addressing the root causes and turning the tide on the 63,000 domestic violence incidents recorded in New Zealand a year. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

To quantify root cause/s (note the plural!) and remove or mitigate requires accurate statistical analysis and the motivation to remove/mitigate the cause/s.

The data presented gives no information on actual occurences of domestic violence (police incident catergorisations are not a casual indicator and it is doubtful if they are an unbiased and accurate record)

The biggest barrier to root cause removal is mistaking &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_cause_variation#Common-cause_variation" rel="nofollow"&gt;common cause variation as special cause variation &lt;/a&gt;due to poor data sources and ideologically bound analysis.

Looking at the "noise" (common cause variation) of the system leads on a merry goose chase and ignores the signals from the system (Special/Assingable Cause variation)

Root cause analysis (my bread and butter trade) requires listening to the voice of the process and understanding what it is really telling you. This analysis wants you to listen to the noise of the process and jump to unsupportable conclusions.

The result is ill informed commenatary like this as reported by Hans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The focus must be brought back to gendered nature of this violence. If we fail to recognise the dynamics of power behind domestic violence we have little chance of addressing the root causes and turning the tide on the 63,000 domestic violence incidents recorded in New Zealand a year. </p></blockquote>
<p>To quantify root cause/s (note the plural!) and remove or mitigate requires accurate statistical analysis and the motivation to remove/mitigate the cause/s.</p>
<p>The data presented gives no information on actual occurences of domestic violence (police incident catergorisations are not a casual indicator and it is doubtful if they are an unbiased and accurate record)</p>
<p>The biggest barrier to root cause removal is mistaking <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_cause_variation#Common-cause_variation" rel="nofollow">common cause variation as special cause variation </a>due to poor data sources and ideologically bound analysis.</p>
<p>Looking at the &#8220;noise&#8221; (common cause variation) of the system leads on a merry goose chase and ignores the signals from the system (Special/Assingable Cause variation)</p>
<p>Root cause analysis (my bread and butter trade) requires listening to the voice of the process and understanding what it is really telling you. This analysis wants you to listen to the noise of the process and jump to unsupportable conclusions.</p>
<p>The result is ill informed commenatary like this as reported by Hans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
