it is good to read on this site other groups struggles, recognising that international energies against gender based problems should be broadcast, confidently, here.

I believe the purpose behind this is to draw together the energies of other groups, and from here in New Zealand particularly to bring the problem out from under the surface and have it tabled in such a manner that it can be aired and exposed for better public awareness.

This appeal is common and the loss of interest too is as common as it is so hard always for a marginalised group - in this case men discriminated against as of lesser domestic value - to gain the momentum required to attract resource allocation to demand change.

To compete with this your comments are noted from New Zealand. Today, I had planned to write to Peter Dunne our Minister of Revenue, and I intend to draw to his attention this site along with others, and compare the basis of this information to his desire to be humane. I challenge him where his focus, always clearly regards his education, moral coupling to that culture of education and awareness of the needs of every citizen as right, balanced and progressive.

His position politically suppporting those views remains repressive.

Optimally he will recognise if he is draw to follow your links that there is new opportunity starting as drawn from this country for the world to change its oppressive behaviours by recognising the oppression of those ever esteemed to be the oppressor.

We have another MP named Hone Harawira. He is indigenous Maori. Peter Dunne doesn’t like Hone Harawira, he thinks Hone is a racist with separatist views. Last night in the House of Representatives Hone replied to a challenge by another MP and said that every Maori he supports is an “intelligent Maori”. To me, clearly, he emphasised the separation of views of thinking and at the very least “proved” that Peter Dunne exercises in power without much consideration of those people whom he does not think are of his kind in elite.

He sets the rules on Child Tax. I allege he doesn’t have a clue on how much damage those rules are hurting men.

If I run out of time to write to him today I will do so by the end of this week. Thank you for the opportunity to bring your campaign into the view of our government.

Respectfully,
Benjamin Easton

(of a) fathers coalition.

I request all international MENS organizations to please help SIF to fight this abuse against men and society.

Thanks,
Rajesh

The reason I won’t be drawn to comment is because it is directly confused in a presumption of multiculturalism. Objectively we have no licence to accord these pieces of legislation so the condition is presently a complete nonsense. There is no legal justification for the position of sovereignty to further compound the problems.

If I am protecting Deepak, that wuold be a different matter and I would happily enter into the nonsense. What would happen though if history is 100% predictable is that I would read through the legislation and I would find a fault in the application of teh legislation as against its object, purpose or principle. And then the wheels would fall off and we would get back to teh Treaty of Waitangi, which leads us to the Declaration of Independence, which highlights the biggest difficulty everyone was always faced with which gave licence for the problems that we have now, is that Maori themselves have territorial and historical issues to clean up before the republicanism of the constitution for the Declaration can or could be given any licence to remedy. Big problem but hardly big enough that it cannot be sorted out!

You are being very unfair on Russians with your ignorant stereotype.

I am happily married to a Russian, as are a number of other men I know.

The myth of them coming over here for a better life is precisely that - myth. Most Russian immigrants take a drop in living standrads coming here.

While there are a few Russian women who do rip guys off through scams, the majority of them are decent women who have not had their brains fucked by feminism.