<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men&#8217;s Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/</link>
	<description>- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 21:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-142147</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-142147</guid>
		<description>I suggest when dealing with ird you must get a case manager, if the parent to be paid gets her/his back up and starts making numerous complaints to ird and allegations about his/her income they will act for that person, the squeaky wheel gets the oil, we applied to our local mp who had a ministrial enquiry into the moc's claims and she was then refused any more reviews for two years and he did not have to pay anything for that time,, it took a bit but well worth the effort, or you can authorize someone to act for him, I have done it for several with great results.  I dealt only with a David Knibb from chch in the end and whenever I rang about a new case he got right onto it.  Once pinpointed they can be helpful, I also went to the ombudsman who got money returned to one man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest when dealing with ird you must get a case manager, if the parent to be paid gets her/his back up and starts making numerous complaints to ird and allegations about his/her income they will act for that person, the squeaky wheel gets the oil, we applied to our local mp who had a ministrial enquiry into the moc&#8217;s claims and she was then refused any more reviews for two years and he did not have to pay anything for that time,, it took a bit but well worth the effort, or you can authorize someone to act for him, I have done it for several with great results.  I dealt only with a David Knibb from chch in the end and whenever I rang about a new case he got right onto it.  Once pinpointed they can be helpful, I also went to the ombudsman who got money returned to one man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accident Compensation Personal</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-141960</link>
		<dc:creator>Accident Compensation Personal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-141960</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Car accident compensation and ASV-3 vehicles...&lt;/strong&gt;

Car manufacturers are getting on top of car safety features being demanded by motoring groups, road safety organisations and motoring industries across the world....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Car accident compensation and ASV-3 vehicles&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Car manufacturers are getting on top of car safety features being demanded by motoring groups, road safety organisations and motoring industries across the world&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-140845</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-140845</guid>
		<description>I was wondering why the government doesnt just hand the kids to the parent that can afford to bring the kids up. Seems odd that the parent with the least earning potential sits on DPB while the other parent has to pay out to them. The earning parent doesnt get the option to have day to day care if its a man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering why the government doesnt just hand the kids to the parent that can afford to bring the kids up. Seems odd that the parent with the least earning potential sits on DPB while the other parent has to pay out to them. The earning parent doesnt get the option to have day to day care if its a man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-140842</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-140842</guid>
		<description>My partner is in huge debt from an income that didnt exist and all the penalties .. now he has to prove it wasnt there. Very painful process that he just isnt up to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner is in huge debt from an income that didnt exist and all the penalties .. now he has to prove it wasnt there. Very painful process that he just isnt up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starr</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-140190</link>
		<dc:creator>starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-140190</guid>
		<description>ok so i am not alone. thanks guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok so i am not alone. thanks guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Harvey</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-139685</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-139685</guid>
		<description>What you say isn't unusual Starr.  When a debt is being chased, especially if someone has gone to Ausie to work (and grieve about the loss of their children due to Family court orders) some amazing fictitious figures are created.  I saw one where they claimed a chap was earning the maximum (108kpa) from the day he left his Nz employment.
I also know of several admin reviews where the review officer has used figures 100% more than declared as taxable eanings (and accepted buy the rest of IRD).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you say isn&#8217;t unusual Starr.  When a debt is being chased, especially if someone has gone to Ausie to work (and grieve about the loss of their children due to Family court orders) some amazing fictitious figures are created.  I saw one where they claimed a chap was earning the maximum (108kpa) from the day he left his Nz employment.<br />
I also know of several admin reviews where the review officer has used figures 100% more than declared as taxable eanings (and accepted buy the rest of IRD).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-139408</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-139408</guid>
		<description>If you can manage to manoeuvre the IRD into a corner where you can prove that they have made errors in their proceedures,you will find that they can become 'almost helpful'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can manage to manoeuvre the IRD into a corner where you can prove that they have made errors in their proceedures,you will find that they can become &#8216;almost helpful&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starr</title>
		<link>http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-139396</link>
		<dc:creator>starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menz.org.nz/2008/mens-work/#comment-139396</guid>
		<description>bit off topic but have you guys ever had your child support calculated on a salary 30 to 50G higher than what you earn by IRD. and when queried they claim thats what the employer told them when it really was not the case???...

i get the feeling that IRD are playing some sort of games and the debt that they highlight by non paying liable parent is a byproduct of this action on their part...

do any of you have that experience??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bit off topic but have you guys ever had your child support calculated on a salary 30 to 50G higher than what you earn by IRD. and when queried they claim thats what the employer told them when it really was not the case???&#8230;</p>
<p>i get the feeling that IRD are playing some sort of games and the debt that they highlight by non paying liable parent is a byproduct of this action on their part&#8230;</p>
<p>do any of you have that experience??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
