Comments on: NZ Republicans Burn Protection Orders

By: Scott

Scott — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:20:12 +0000

Did any of you alert all the press and media? I didn’t see/read/hear anything about this. If you did and no-one reported on it, have you asked why?

By: bull en a china shop

bull en a china shop — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:00:08 +0000

maybe.., but a woman knows she only need’s the nut sack, not the man…
http://www.mulletjunky.com/webimages/nutmull.jpg

By: Hadi Akbari

Hadi Akbari — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:26:54 +0000

Hi Bull, you are right but forgot one thing, woman need men to get pregnant so if there are no men there are no babies, if a woman doesnt love a man enough to have them in their life then maybe should not have brought a poor innocent child into the world

By: bull en a china shop

bull en a china shop — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:51:35 +0000

Man is “The Protector”, he builds roads, he builds houses, he builds skyscrapers, without man, civilisation would crumble…, man can only be a threat to himself at the end of the day, feeble women collect these “Protection Orders” like they are some kind of University Degree, but we know that for at least $900.00 a pop to obtain one at the tax payer’s expense care of your local legal parasite, they have become extemely popular. Burn that “PROTECTION ORDER” is the only alternative, it is in any case, a false document from it’s very nature by name.

By: Tigerseye

Tigerseye — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:05:39 +0000

The only thing war does is take our good men and kills them leaving women to look after whats left of the country. And what is left? Those that the army did not see fit in draughting or enlisting.

War is not the answer - the answer is to fight fire with fire. In a lot of ways protesting does very little but let the government know that there are a small number of people not happy with the system…. and then there are more talks. We need to speak their language. They tell us all the things we can’t talk about and hide FC proceedings like it’s some kind of conspiracy and throw you in jail for opening your mouth about it like you’re some sort of heretic threat to national security. We are meant to believe in the government and he who doth not believe shall spend eternity in hell. There was another organisation which moved to head of state around 2500 years ago that successfully abolished free thinking. That organisation is still around today, right under our noses - ironically, it’s laws are what our governing heads are pouting as our groundwork for a better sosciety…and also the greatest cause of the most frightening wars.

I digress and I ramble but the truth remains… we need to fight within the doctorine of the english language rather than with our guns and fists. We need to make every single New Zealander know and understand the shit that’s going on behind closed doors in the Beehive. Sounds like a documentary to me.

By: martin swash

martin swash — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:18:44 +0000

nothing else is going to get us our kids and our rights back really , is it ?

By: Jim Bailey

Jim Bailey — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:36:09 +0000

What rot to suggest we need a war - Take a look at history at what it costs in human lives, and generations of pain, spiritually, physically and mentaly to most. - My Family + many others lost 2 uncles to war and several who lived very limited lives because of injuries

Great stuff from Blamemenforall - Trouble is there are few Kiwis listening to each other let alone listening -/- watching whats going on outside NZ - Those learning from whats happening outside NZ are using it destroy our Families, especially our Paternal Families, rather than building alliances to strengthen our Families -/- In fact it is well known that officials from NZGovt Edifices travel constantly gaining info to strengthen their dastedly ways.

Gate Keepering the efforts of many of our coleagues -/- peers in their efforts to change our Nation for the better is absurd especially as we go into a General Election - How will one vote well on the day if one or our moderators gate keep apinion - Should we not be open to as many options as poss at this time?

By: Perseus

Perseus — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:35:53 +0000

What we need is a war , then all the social engineered laws will soon be forgotten, men make the world, women make babies

By: blamemenforall

blamemenforall — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:05:15 +0000

We have the benefit of the experience of the US and other countries in how their constitutions do or do not work in the modern era. A solid constitution should be able to prevent the feminazis from bringing about male-denigrating law changes; should be able to protect the rights of men as well as women. Some feminist initiatives have been thwarted in the US due to its constitution, inadequate as it may be. Britain probably exceeds the US in male unfriendly policies and repression of its people; for example, they had no constitution to stop their government allowing itself to monitor all emails, and they are about to introduce a law to excuse women from murdering men. The queen of England hasn’t done anything to stem the rate at which NZ is turning men into 2nd class citizens. Well nigh time for a change I’d say.

By: JohnP

JohnP — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:50:40 +0000

I happen to agree with you Chris, but MENZ isn’t the place to discuss that.

I am happy for any political party’s supporters to post items relevant to men’s and fathering issues.

If the Republicans are seen to be gathering any type of serious support for their policies, perhaps one of the bigger parties might realise there is a constituency of voters who’s needs are not being addressed.