“The claims that are made for not spanking children fail to hold up.”
- professor Marjorie Gunnoe

Cheers,
Benjamin.

Has anyone made a compilation of the grossly sexist propaganda television commercials used in part to aid in falsely justifing the oppressive policies legislation of the anti-clark regime’s era?

Taken from mens news daily -

Gender Rules of Today
Monday, November 9, 2009
By Pelle Billing

1. Women want full independence — Women want male protection when things get rough or dangerous
2. Men and women can vote — The draft and compulsory military service are male only
3. Men are expected to work in jobs that they do not care for to support their families – Men are lazy for not doing half of the housework
4. When boys perform badly in school there is a “crisis in masculinity” — When girls or women perform badly they are being discriminated against
5. Women “get rid of jerks” — Men “cannot commit”
6. Male circumcision is a proud tradition — Female circumcision is abhorred, even the kinds that are milder than male circumcision
7. Commenting on a woman’s cleavage is sexual harassment — A woman who purposely flaunts her cleavage at work is not sexually harassing anyone
8. All good men pay for the date — All good men support gender neutral pay
9. Men’s financial power must be controlled — Women’s sexual power must be liberated
10. Fathers should take care of their children — Children aren’t DNA tested to establish paternity
11. Men prey on women — Women exercise their sexual freedom
12. The overarching inconsistency: Men are responsible for their actions and failures — Women are victims of circumstances or societal structures

http://www.stuff.co..nz/dominion-post/local/3080755/Mall-campaign-pays-for-protesters

My primary campaign associate Maria van der Meel, [The City is Ours] has been sited for co-coordinating the payment of $25 for each of 30 students to attend the protest. Personally I dispute that this is what occurred other than 30 students are being employed to define the side of the protest, in fluorescent jackets, assembled in what is called a Human Bus. This bus leaves Manners Mall on December 11 at 12.45 pm to confront the WCC on what I have proved already in the Court of Appeal is an outright abrogation of democratic process.

Keith Stewart in his earlier comment stated that if the funder [of the March for Democracy] had paid the protesters $25 each, he would have only paid out $25,000, not the allegedly spent 100’s of thousands. Essentially popularity is a very fickle thing, and particularly in todays newly minds zoned technological world where everyone in our elite Westminster based system appears to be openly and only thinking all at the very same time.

It is not that we have not been doing this ‘thinking’ for ever; it is more that we just have better access to what is going on in other people’s worlds. In short for those who struggle to extract immediate meaning from what I write, what I am describing is the intangible nature of fact against circumstance. 4000 is not 1000. Colin Craig has made a start but it has not achieved the purpose he set out to achieve, not because he did not necessarily have a qualifiedly good point, but because he rested too much hope on the ‘hyperbole’ of advertising. All of the energy that seems left over as productive or marketable these days seems to be the emissions.

Legally, referenda are not in a position [yet] to represent democracy. This is not to say that they are not part of a future, but at the moment that entire future is fragile where the abuse which Colin Craig collects on public complaint has not properly been identified and until he or others who would advocate in the same position centre on the absolute controversy as it is functionally real for that public, such a protest march is only set to trickle down Auckland’s Queen Street.

John Key is not the primary target – he is the servant of a target. Feminist propaganda is the machine of the first target. Child health and security through solid family practices bridging religions should be seen as a cause.

“Science is simply on and off where religion takes its cause”.