- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Fri 16th November 2012

Leeanna Marie Hodgetts, rapes and abducts child.

Filed under: General,Sex Abuse / CYF — Vman @ 9:34 am

Leeanna Marie Hodgetts, 39, seduced, raped and abucted a child. However you will never see the NZ media report it that way. You certainly will never see NZ courts treat it that way.

The reason? Leeanna Marie Hodgetts, is a female.

And in NZ the feminist ideology is far more important than any amount of damage inflicted on children.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10847798

4 Responses to “Leeanna Marie Hodgetts, rapes and abducts child.”

  1. Scott B says:

    Oh I see, when a woman does it, it is a “relationship”

  2. Luther Blissett says:

    Yes, when a woman does it it’s a ‘relationship’, the child is ‘the girl’ rather than ‘the victim’ and emphasis is put on the child’s cooperation with the offending and her infatuation with the abuser (oh, sorry, when it’s a woman the term ‘abuser’ isn’t used at all, she’s a ‘mother of two’). Quite frankly, if this offender were a man and he deliberately stated that he was going on the run with his victim because he might as well make any jail worth it, he would be referred to as an abuser, offender, kidnapper, monster, beast. Feminist groups would be on the media complaining that everyone let the victim down by not intervening earlier, attributing this to patriarchal power and control, and demanding ever more draconian laws to stop these terrible offenders. But the only feminist voices we are likely to hear about this female offender will be excuses, minimization and probably blaming some man in her life.

    It is unusual though that she has been remanded in custody and she has actually been charged with ‘abduction’. I suspect a man would have been charged with ‘sexual violation’ with a maximum penalty of 20 years jail rather than the ‘sexual connection’ with a maximum penalty of 10 years jail that this female beast has been charged with. After all, there was probably digital penetration etc which defines sexual violation (when a male does it).

    Regardless, we can be sure this particular beast because she doesn’t have a penis will get the usual pussy pass when it comes to an actual sentence. We wait with bated breath for sentencing on December 11.

  3. Scott B says:

    Somehow men will be to blame.

  4. Ford says:

    i wonder if she is any relation to darren hodgetts..the non sworn police officer busted for using a police computer to assist the running of a drug ring..maybe she could blame him for having the same name

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

Since May 2019 this site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

« »

Powered by WordPress

Skip to toolbar