- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Thu 7th August 2014

My real live dildo

Filed under: General — Downunder @ 8:07 pm

A female paedophile has been jailed for having sex with an eight-year-old boy more than fifty times.

That’s seems reasonable.

Loren Morris, 21, started sleeping with the boy five years ago
She continued doing it for two years, until the boy was ten
She was convicted of sexual intercourse with a child last month
Today she was given the two-year sentence at Worcester Crown Court

Loren Morris

Loren Morris

The judge in the case told Morris that he would be lenient with the sentence – which will see her released from jail after one year – because she ‘realised it was wrong’ and stopped having sex with the boy.

His batteries must have gone flat.

Judge Robert Juckes QC said: ‘I make no secret of the fact your case has given me cause for much consideration.

‘I have come to the conclusion that due to the concern and embarrassment caused to both you and your family that you will not be offending again, let alone committing sexual offences.

Is this a bit of a ‘pussy pass’?

Defence lawyer Antonie Mullers had told the court Morris was struggling to accept the facts of the case, and asked Judge Juckes to spare her a prison sentence altogether.

Didn’t we have a case where a female teacher had sex with a pupil and when it was found out the teacher committed suicide – that’s right, the coroner suppressed the details and it had to be removed from the site?

13 Responses to “My real live dildo”

  1. William Baldwin says:

    What a disgusting woman. How is it that this is considered sexual intercourse instead of rape.? This case appears to be evidence that its percieved that only a man can commit rape. And her penalty for her crime reflects that. The judges comments are sympathetic to her and suggest that she is not a perpetrator but a victim of poor decisions.
    Her repentance is considered evidence of her esteemed virtue and the seriousness of the crime and the victim impact remains ignored completely. Its just disgusting.

  2. ornerybloke says:

    Yes, disgusting indeed. She is obviously another poor victim of men’s oppression, somewhere in her background, according to the judge, Robert Juckes QC, who is, presumably, male. The greatest miscarriage here is that he, being male, allows himself to be influenced and blinded by misguided feministic indoctrination, that he has willingly taken aboard in order to be seen as ‘reasonable and just.’ Give me a break.

  3. V.O.F.M says:

    this is just totally repugnant to justice even with
    the omit trance of gender, what would a male get
    that did the same? I find it hard to respond and comment
    on such ludicrous sentences,

    has any justice for women offenders been thrown
    out of court because the people issuing the judgement
    are putting security and self preservation ahead of real
    deserved jail time?

    Equality in any sense has been demonised

    3rd world, u bet

  4. William Baldwin says:

    The judge has displayed nothing but sympathy for her. Defence lawyer Antonie Mullers had told the court Morris was struggling to accept the facts of the case, and asked Judge Juckes to spare her a prison sentence altogether.
    He said: ‘Her immaturity at 21 means she cannot accept the facts yet. She accepts her conviction but with time will accept more.
    ‘Her parents have stepped in and are building bridges, I understand she has met with some of her family.
    ‘This could be stifled by a custodial sentence so I urge your honour or try and suspend it if possible.’
    Morris, from Hereford, will serve two years each for the three counts to be served concurrently. ‘I am also aware of the effect this will have on your baby. I am pleased to hear your parents have started to build bridges with you.

    What consideration is given to the victim and his family.
    Well theres just no mention.

    She is considered the victim by the court.

    Pussy pass… ? No thats too kind.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2583647/Female-paedophile-21-jailed-two-years-sex-eight-year-old-boy-50-times-starting-16.html#ixzz39hC3ucWF
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  5. ornerybloke says:

    Yip, same old, same old……
    Men need to be punished, and women need to be helped.
    Mind you, Rolf Harris got out pretty lightly I thought….

  6. soMENi says:

    It’s not unusual for a Judge to sentence a female rapist to the scene of her crime (home detention) and to insinuate the male child victim of female rape is not blameless.

    I’ve been documenting news items where an adult woman is accused and/or convicted of sex crimes against minor boys since March of this year. It’s definately not a minor problem: http://www.someni.org/forums/tags.php?tag=woman+sex+with+male+child

  7. Skeptic says:

    I’ve known guys in NZ get up to 14 years imprisonment for much less sexual abuse.
    This is one of the most disgusting examples of the pussy pass I’ve ever come across.

  8. Phil Watts says:

    What do u expect from the same Lawyer/Judges that are accomplices with paedophile mothers to kidnap their own children from their dads for no reason!

    Lawyers, Judges and cops have already made themselves accomplices in kidnapping and paedophilia by assisting mother’s to kidnap children from fathers who have never harmed them and have no convictions for harming either the children or the psychotic mother.

  9. Phil Watts says:

    Further to my last message – any mother who breaks up a children’s happy childhood by breaking up their family unit (in the absence of any real ‘domestic violence’) is proving herself:
    1) she does not love her children
    2) She views them as possessions or playthings therefore proving herself a paedophile.

  10. MurrayBacon says:

    #4 William Baldwin said:

    The judge has displayed nothing but sympathy for her……

    The judicial oath says “to serve without fear or favour….”

    Sympathy sneaks in where there is a lack of relevant skills, about weighing evidence and understanding the consequences of behaviours. I am talking about the judge, more than the defendantess.

    Evidence is easily swept away by Sympathy

    Everyone, in particular men, need to address sympathy issues, before they worry about evidence and after they worry about evidence, in any caught$ case.

  11. Phil Watts says:

    Very true Murray,
    Men have natural sympathy toward women and children and are too forgiving, and conversely women have natural sympathy towards women and are naturally unforgiving.

    Men are the natural protectors of women and children and women take that protection and (in their minds) twist it into meaning ‘control’ when we all know who controls most conversations and relationships between men and women
    – it ain’t men!

  12. MurrayBacon says:

    Dear Phil, my comments were directed mainly at caught evidence. As you say, there is wider application between men and women.

    Men are the natural protectors of women – in an evolutionary sense this is well demonstrated by men’s and women’s relative size.

    However, if the theory of estrogen based parasites has validity (I don’t believe that it has), then perhaps women will grow relatively larger than men through the next 40 or 100 generations (if men in general don’t wake up to what is happening?).

    I don’t think that women are generally anti men, in the way that you suggest. If it seems like that, then I suggest to try to move in other circles…

    Best regards, MurrayBacon.

  13. Lukenz says:

    Analysing what has happened here I am certain the Judge has somehow taken the view this 8 year old boy was in a willing relationship and that if he was not a willing partner the sex could not have taken place.

    Regardless, however a Judge could justify or rationalize how this woman behaved remains quite simply repulsive to any sane human.
    At age 8 this boys should have not been involved in any sexual activity with any person.

    If this boy was in a normal healthy family with 2 loving parents taking him to activities like Cubs and trips to the zoo, parks, museums, sports etc, helping him with homework and the like, spending time with his mates, parents teaching him skills and installing him with integrity by example he would have a better chance to do well and cope with life’s challenges.

    There will be a time in this boys where he will reflect on what has happened to him and his lost childhood and will know this price has not been accounted for in the light sentence handed down to the woman.

    Judge – you should be on trial yourself for such a shameful act of impartialness between the sexes and allowing this woman to get off so lightly. You do not belong on the bench and I hope the powers above you move you on quickly.

Leave a Reply

Connect with Facebook

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are now likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

« »

Powered by WordPress