- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Sat 10th May 2014

Pussy Pass (3) for Judith Collins

Filed under: Gender Politics,General — Downunder @ 11:38 am

We know, and it is often discussed on Menz, how women are held to different standards of accountability. In this post I want to look at a social anomaly in the way society responds to women.

The recent post Pussy Pass for Judith Collins looks at how British Prime Minister David Cameron and New Zealand Prime Minister John Key handled the financial scandals surrounding their respective ministers, Maria Miller and Judith Collins.

There are differences between the two situations, in that Maria Miller had her hand in the parliamentary till over expenses whereas Collins was using her ministerial warrant to advantage a company her family is heavy involved with, which also brings a cost to the taxpayer.

Both Prime Ministers initially went into bat for their ministers; Cameron didn’t know when to give up, and a severe public backlash eventually left a British prime minister red faced at his own behaviour – trying to defend the indefensible.

Key on the other hand has continued to stand behind Judith Collins and apologise on her behalf; this may have been because Collins is considered too big to fail, but the fallout was predictable. A recent poll saw a similar backlash from the New Zealand public such as that experienced by David Cameron over his handling of the Millar scandal. Collins may be on sick leave, but this is not over yet.

There is another factor at play here. One that is not often tested in the political arena, and that is female financial integrity.

Correct me if I am wrong, but my feeling is that women loose their gender immunity when the nature of the offending requires financial accountability. This is a big no-no, especially for women in places of power and authority. This is a depth to which it is expected women will not descend; and when they do – society pulls that ‘walk of right’ that protective pathway that women are so accustomed to, right out from under them.

Women can and do get away with many things they shouldn’t (in a supposedly equal society) but such behaviour instantly takes them down off that pedestal. We’ve seen it other cases outside of politics, where women have sacrificed their financial integrity for personal gain and suffered the consequences.

I’ve been watching this one closely and I had to chuckle when Judith Collins declared New Zealand to be ‘on a witch hunt’. The irony. As I said in Pussy Pass (2) for Judith Collins I have no doubt she knew what she was doing but I’m not sure that Collins actually understands the position she has put herself and her political party in. Collins is not representative of women in parliament, or of women that public opinion supports in parliament. It is times like these that a MPs individual achievements quickly lose their significance.

Collins has dished up a fait accompli for both herself and her political party.

When Collins decided to undertake to push her own barrow across the Chinese border to have Oravida exports excused from border controls, the damage was already done; it was only a question of if or when she got caught. When she did, the prospect of standing down a minister of justice, a potential party leader, and turning on a major party-donor, set up the too-big-to-fail conflict faced by John Key and the New Zealand National Party.

The National Party have lost their decisive lead in the run up to this year’s parliamentary election – if they turn up the loser’s card come election day there will be considerable debate over how much Collins contributed to that failure. Regardless of the outcome though, this Collinsian behaviour will not only be indelibly etched in New Zealand political history but the name should gain recognition by definition in its own right, and without doubt will be a much more considered factor in the decision making of future leaders. (Perhaps that also of John Key in the not too distant future)

These two examples show just how strongly female financial integrity (FFI) is ingrained in not just a national psyche but the human psyche. When it comes to the FFI index, there are only two standards – a healthy-pass or a big-fail. Cameron learnt the hard way. Is Key still on his learning curse? There’s visible damage and a gaping hole in the body armour of the smiling assassin.

Do you feel the same way – about women and financial integrity – does the sympathy card go out the window?

Has Judith Collins as a Lawyer, past president of a Law Society, MP, Minister of Justice, come up with the biggest fail since the liberation of women in New Zealand?

When John Key said New Zealanders weren’t concerned about this; did he, like David Cameron, get it seriously wrong?

Do you think there is any other situation where women are judged more harshly when it comes to losing the sympathy card?

8 Responses to “Pussy Pass (3) for Judith Collins”

  1. Soothsayer says:

    The financial ‘pp’ was repeatedly given to Lucille Lloyd (ANZ Bank) and the devil woman’s colleagues at the IRD.

    Financial control is exerted by many mechanisms including family law (social terrorism), education (positive discrimination), career sabotage (affirmative action), false allegations (McCarthyism) and the nanny state (social wage).

  2. Phil Watts says:

    Until women come out and complain en masse about female’s obvious matriarchy privilege, then they reveal themselves as the narcissistic takers that they are. They have proven the selfishness of the female gender.

  3. Skeptic says:

    Related to the topic – This makes you think, huh?

  4. Allan Harvey says:

    Can’t disagree Skeptic.
    Yes, “Men are good”, I never doubted it.

  5. Downunder says:

    Thanks Skeptic.

    Men are Good.

    Try getting feminist entitlement bleaters to say that.

  6. MurrayBacon says:

    I’m the victim of a smear campaign: Judith Collins resigns

    John Armstrong: Key has removed a weeping sore from Nat campaign

    Dear Victim Collins seemed to have more problems attract themselves to her, than all of the rest of the National Party put together.

    Let this be a warning to all men and women who might have to deal with familycaught$, don’t be your own worst enemy.
    Be streetwise and expose yourself to the absolute minimum risk in familycaught$, that you have to.

    Remember that the familycaught$ only damages people who take it seriously (and expect too much from it).
    Take seriously the damage that familycaught$ can do.

    Funny that Minister Collins was Minister of Justice. She did little to develop the quality of justice in NZ. Cost cutting attempts that fail, isn’t making improvements in any sense.

    I guess this shows again, that the type of minds that created familycaught$, cannot solve the problems of it’s existence.

  7. Downunder says:

    That was Pussy Pass (3) – I wondered how much longer it would go on before someone put her down.

    It got past too big to fail, more like what the hell has she got in her top drawer on the prime minster.

    The only progression I can see in the whole sorry matter, is from witch-hunt to smear-campaign, but it’s only fair that we look at her side of the story too.

  8. MurrayBacon says:

    Why has National had two MinisterofJustices in such dire ethical quagmires, when Labour’s MoJ have just been ineffectual at holding back the greed of legal workers?

    Sir Douglas Graham, who spoke for Domestic Violence Act, was later prosecuted for financial fraud (essentially greedy, lazy and incompetent as director).

    Judith Collins has had ongoing, multiple, last ethical violations.

    Both seem astonishing, for an apparent leader of Justice within NZ?

    But ethical amorality isn’t the real problem that NZ faces, it is lack of interest in the well-being of general citizens and interest in serving only their “electorate” – those who provide unusually large donations for more-equal service. Among this eclectic list it seems, is USA Government, chinese landowners, sky high gamblers, CH3CH2OH retailers and maybe orgasmic “ah” providers. I can only see negative correlations to the welfare of NZers earning under $150,000 per year.

    I would try to draw the agenda back to getting the caught$ to competently serve NZers and intergalactic aliens too, at cost effective prices. In that respect, I would see little difference between National or Labour Ministers of Justice, as judged by outcomes during their tenure?

    Rorts roll on relentlessly.

Leave a Reply

Connect with Facebook

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are now likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Powered by WordPress