This will be of interest to anyone who deals with an ex-partner through legally transferred communications only, or who has communicated this way in the past.
I’m looking at an interesting case, where many years ago, a group of Labour Party professionals (during labour’s time in power) constructed a court case in favour of another Labour Party member, against her ex-husband.
Now that this couple is older (and the children all adults) and the children having necessarily become involved in the parent’s affairs because of health issues, some interesting things have come to light.
It happens that the ex-husband was not on the Labour Party’s preferred list of people because of his own involvement in politics and it transpires that they have different sets of documents, there being a hole in what was actually given to the wife.
In other words these Labour Party professionals constructed a court case to launch their own independent attack on this father using his ex-wife’s name.
At the moment this is being denied, likewise is the legitimacy of the ex-husband’s documents. He now ‘appears’ to be the only one that has these.
This raises a question as to whether this case was actually a Family Court Case, and if so has someone been through the Family Court sanitising some of our court cases?
Is anyone else finding they have disappearing documents or disappearing court cases?
As it never actually made it to a hearing (and was probably never intended to) the other possibility is that this group, including the judge, and the ex-husband’s legal representatives, set up a ruse outside of the court, but now deny the existence of their documents.
Is anyone in a similar situation where they have been attacked with the unauthorised use of another person’s name, using the secret confines of the Family Court?
I’ve viewed a complaint that’s now been sent to the New Zealand Law Society.
It will be interesting to see what they do about this, other than run for cover and pretend it never happened.
I’ll keep you updated.