- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Fri 16th September 2016

Female Hypocrisy Concerning Sentencing of a Male

Filed under: General — Ministry of Men's Affairs @ 11:08 am

Lynch mob calls for harsher punishment of Nikolas Delegat for repeatedly punching a police officer have claimed that his wealth, status, ability to afford a good lawyer and his skin colour all led to a light sentence. The skin colour issue became a major focus especially after the ‘Independent’ Police Complaints Authority (IPCA) released an analysis of pre-charge warnings vs prosecutions from police in different regions around NZ and towards Pakeha vs Maori accused.

Unfortunately, the IPCA didn’t see fit also to undertake a further simple calculation to compare the rate of pre-charge warnings given to women vs men. If they had they would almost certainly have found that females are much more likely to receive pre-charge warnings than are males, and that the gender difference here is much greater than any racial difference.

The IPCA’s racial comparison did not amount to evidence of racial bias by police. Their report emphasized that they did not find any evidence clearly demonstrating differential treatment on the basis of ethnicity. The different pre-charge warning rate was largely explained by the fact that Maori accused were much more likely than Pakeha to have previous convictions.

However, there is good research evidence by criminologist Greg Newbold that our justice system practices significant gender bias favouring women. Anecdotally too it is very rare to come across cases of female offending in which women receive treatment or punishment comparable to that for men.

The lynch mob that targeted Mr Delegat included women whose hypocrisy was considerable in complaining that a young male may have received a lenient sentence when they are part of the non-penis gender that almost always receives lenient sentences.

Oh, did we forget to mention that the police officer punched by Mr Delegat was a female officer? This was no doubt a major driver of the public outcry. The White Ribbon campaign has encouraged us all to care only about violence when it’s done to women and by men. Assault of a female by a male is still treated as twice as bad in sentencing tariffs as assault by anyone of a mere male. Many male police officers are assaulted in the course of their duties and the offenders receive comparable sentences to that for Mr Delegat, but when did we last hear an indignant outcry in those cases? Despite the insistence that female police be paid equally to male police, male officers continue to be called upon to subdue most of the violent offenders and to go to the front line in the most dangerous situations. Those confronting armed offenders will almost all be men. Although there may be exceptions, that general tendency is unlikely to change any time soon because it’s based in fundamental genetic instinct.

2 Responses to “Female Hypocrisy Concerning Sentencing of a Male”

  1. Doug says:

    I think the outcry is because he’s obviously been let off because daddy is rich, don’t try to read anything more into it than that. You suggest there should be a similar outcry when a woman gets away with a similarly feeble sentence after murdering a man, too right there should but it doesn’t mean fair minded people shouldn’t be outraged about the Delegat case.

  2. Ministry of Men's Affairs says:

    Doug (#1):

    Thanks for your comment.

    Accounts of the outcry show clearly that it’s about Mr Delegat receiving an allegedly lenient sentence for any or all of the following reasons: he’s rich and could afford a good lawyer, his family has status, or he’s white.

    Delegat wasn’t ‘let off’ at all. He incurred a conviction and received a punishment. The punishment was said by a number of experienced lawyers to be similar to what anyone (at least male), would get for a first offence with no criminal history, that he pleaded guilty to, for which the offender showed remorse and a commitment to avoid future re-offending. Females who offend similarly will almost certainly get more lenient treatment.

    I made no suggestion that there should be an outcry against light sentencing of women (which almost always happens for any offence, not just murder). I simply highlight the hypocrisy of women who criticize allegedly light sentencing of a male.

    Although I do believe some women are treated too lightly for some offending, in general my preference is that male offenders be shown similar levels of understanding and mercy as that typically shown to women.

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

Since May 2016 this site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

« »

Powered by WordPress

Skip to toolbar