Why has the NZ government given the power to family court judges to cause mental health and the suicide of hundreds of kiwi dads?
Why has the New Zealand government given the power to family court judges to cause mental health and the suicide of hundreds of dads in New Zealand? And why is it that no one in the New Zealand government wants to pick up the mantle for male problems like this one? Are they fearful of the backlash and political future? I look up to people like Pauline Hanson who has put herself on the line for all the male suicides in their country. Pauline’s future is strengthened by her stance as I’m sure our own ministers would be if they open up the shame of our own appalling male suicide figures.
The children of these dead fathers want answers. The liability for male suicide is growing.
Jacinda Ardern – All I ask is to break the cycle of male suicide in New Zealand. Be the world leader of reform and stop the shameful bureaucratic nonsense and end the slaughter.
The next clip can only be viewed on youtube and not in a window here. It lays blame 270 men a year commit suicide at the hands of the Family court and the collection agencies.
YOU MUST VIEW THIS VIDEO CLIP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5n9vUZYZhc
And for all those twits who would gleefully point out the clips were of our Australian cousins….. the New Zealand system practically mirrors just that. The only difference is we do not have collection agencies taking a commission (reward money) and the Australians Parliamentarians are on to it.
The simple answer is that politicians wanted child support payments but not the problems associated with it so they created a court to divest themselves of the problem.
The court in the preservation of their business doesn’t mind if men die as long as women and children don’t – that wouldn’t be good for business.
Comment by Bevan — Fri 18th December 2020 @ 6:39 am
I did the maths.
It’s a bout $1570 per man,woman, child per year.
Sounds like a tax to me.
So the family of 4 needs to set aside $6,000 a year for expected FC costs.
As generations go by.
Everybody becomes effected by wrongs.
The mother will fight for her children.
To protect them.
She has obviously found herself helpless.
And unable to protect her children.
You can see the hurt in her words.
As she spoke of her sons experience.
How many fight now.
Are dishonest and win now.
Feeling empowered.
Only to see the suffering they made and supported.
Become there own suffering.
So they feel helpless.
Buddha, anybody!
Bevan.
I have not seen this not good for business thing.
When a women dies.
We see endless calls for more power.
For more business.
Hanson calls for more judges.
For more business, faster.
It is a solution to managing the problem.
Not a solution to the problem.
Her intent is good.
As I said.
I can feel it in her words.
Comment by DJ Ward — Fri 18th December 2020 @ 10:01 am
Truth is not profitable , lies are
Comment by tony — Fri 18th December 2020 @ 2:12 pm
Profit.
Be certain of this.
You must charge more than something is worth to make a profit.
Lawyers make fortunes.
Imagine if prosecutors had to pay the defendant there wages if they are found not guilty.
Should the not guilty defendant not get a wage?
Are they not made slaves to the prosecution.
There time taken, freedom abused.
Has the prosecution not lied and been paid to lie.
That they had the evidence for guilt but did not.
It is sometimes impossible not to lie.
We just accept the lie with context.
It got hotter, truth. To your reference.
But something else had to get colder, truth.
Overall nothing changed.
It got lighter, truth. To you reference.
But something else got heavier, truth.
Overall nothing changed.
You go faster in your car, truth.
But you don’t move in your car, truth.
Overall nothing changes with your reference, the car.
Your reference to the planet is you moved.
There is however a difference between physics and the conscious mind.
It can choose to lie.
Comment by DJ Ward — Fri 18th December 2020 @ 6:43 pm
If you look at the Family Court in terms of all women being equal and that some women do not have an emotional relationship with their children, they are just possessions of a life style then this is the bottom rung that the court must descend to in protecting the child mother relationship.
It’s an impossible position against which logic and reason cannot prevail and a negative incentive to provide sensible outcomes.
More judges and faster courts will do the same thing faster.
Comment by Bevan — Fri 18th December 2020 @ 7:56 pm
Men need to stop marrying women and refuse to have kids, unless you do something to stop misandry it will only get worse and worse. Men and boys are being attacked, feminism is a hate movement women are sexist hypocrites who create double standards that go against men and boys. They arte our enemies and so are the stpid pervert men who support them.
Comment by David Lavery — Sun 20th December 2020 @ 11:02 am
Men need to stop marrying women and refuse to have kids, unless you do something to stop misandry it will only get worse and worse. Men and boys are being attacked, feminism is a hate movement women are sexist hypocrites who create double standards that go against men and boys. They are our enemies and so are the stupid pervert men who support them.
Comment by David Lavery — Sun 20th December 2020 @ 11:03 am
David Lavery wrote “Men need to stop marrying women and refuse to have kids, unless you do something to stop misandry it will only get worse and worse. Men and boys are being attacked, feminism is a hate movement women are sexist hypocrites who create double standards that go against men and boys. They are our enemies and so are the stupid pervert men who support them’
I could not disagree more. IMO, men need to support their wives and children, and work to change the trend that has been marketed to them. Anything else is working for the feminist agenda, which has only been introduced to the West and is really about population control
Comment by James — Tue 29th December 2020 @ 1:43 pm