- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -


MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.
MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Fri 24th March 2006

No Fathers’ & Men’s Lawyers Are Allowed In New Zealand?

Filed under: General — Intrepid @ 1:35 pm

Lawyers May Not Be Involved in the Father’s Right Movement and be allowed to be a Lawyer in New Zealand)

In a land mark case the High Court of New Zealand will be faced with dismissing a properly certified lawyer applicant after being turned down by the Wellington District Law Society for his activist work on the behalf of the father’s & men’s right work. The call on supporters worldwide to contact the New Zealand government and demand Peter Zohrab be accepted with no prejudice or political bias immediately when his appeal to the law societies decision comes before her government.

The Crown Law email address to contact and voice your complaint: library@crownlaw.govt.nz

Peter Zohrab:
[update]

It might be better to email the political boss of Crown Law (the Attorney-General) because the Library at Crown Law might just ditch political emails.

So I suggest you ask everyone to email kim.mackenzie@parliament.govt.nz , which is the current Attorney-General (Dr. Michael Cullen)’s email address. Unfortunately, there is going to be a cabinet reshuffle, apparently, but hopefully emails would be forwarded to the new one.

Her organization has been virtually accused of denying me a certificate for political reasons, and all she can say in response is to spell out some legal technicalities of the admission process!

In a free society, there is no legal basis for denying someone entry to the legal profession on the basis of their political views. The fact alone that a female Council member laughed when I told the Council about being assaulted by feminist law students casts doubt on the judgment of the Council.

It is relevant to raise the issue of the broader context, which is the apparent inability of many men and fathers to find lawyers who take a sufficiently pro-men stance.

For those wishing to express more anger as well, contact the Wellington District Law Society who have already turned down Peter Zohrab due to a disregard to Law for the sake of dishonourable poltical agendas : wellaw@wellaw.co.nz

9 Responses to “No Fathers’ & Men’s Lawyers Are Allowed In New Zealand?”

  1. Stephen says:

    To: library@crownlaw.govt.nz
    Subject: Lawyer application

    Dear Madam / Sir,

    I wish it to be known that I am against the recent decision in a landmark case in which our woman Prime Minister of New Zealand will be faced with dismissing a properly certified lawyer applicant after being turned down by the Wellington District Law Society for his activist work on the behalf of the father’s & men’s right work.

    It is relevant to raise the issue of the broader context, which is the apparent inability of many men and fathers to find lawyers who take a sufficiently pro-men stance.

    I will be watching this case closely with much interest, as will men’s and father’s rights activists world-wide.

    Sincerely Yours,

    Stephen Gee.

  2. Jim Bailey says:

    Sent: Friday, 24 March 2006 4:31 p.m.
    To: ‘library@crownlaw.govt.nz’
    Subject: Lawyer application

    Dear Madam / Sir,
    I wish it to be known that I am against the recent decision in a landmark case in which our woman Prime Minister of New Zealand will be faced with dismissing a properly certified lawyer applicant after being turned down by the Wellington District Law Society for his activist work on the behalf of the father’s & men’s right work.
    It is relevant to raise the issue of the broader context, which is the apparent inability of many men and fathers to find lawyers who take a sufficiently pro-men stance.
    I will be watching this case closely with much interest, as will men’s and father’s rights activists world-wide.
    Sincerely Yours,
    Jim Bailey
    http://www.HandsOnEqualParent.org.nz

  3. julie says:

    John, What happened to scraps post about Good Morning New Zealand?

  4. julie says:

    Sorry John, I see it. (Post from scrap)

  5. Peter Burns says:

    library@crownlaw.govt.nz
    Our Prime Minister cannot defend the indefensible, that is, Peter Zohrab is the victim of unlawful gender discrimination – as it is a well know fact that the judicial system is influenced by hateful feminazi’s. I have produced overwhelming evidence that the bias experts were wrong in proceedings brought against the Prime Minister and others for malicious gender discrimination – however the evil one got it struck out and the Crown was awarded costs. Over my dead body will I pay the corrupt scum one bloody cent, ref.- Human Rights Review Tribunal decision HRRT 028 /2005! You be warned if you deny Mr Zohrab his fundamental right to practise law you are opening yourself for huge litigation covered under the International Human Rights. Think hard — does Helengard & your dishonest law society really want to have to explain to the International Court of Justice in The Hague ( dreams are free) Oh that’s right our dishonest low life PM can do anything as she has proved to us all she is above the law – however the fact is the judiciary is supposed (lol) to act independently from the executive. Ask MP Nick Smith about that !!!!!! If a complainant can prove that a political view has shown prejudice then you open the door for a big time class action lawsuit on behalf of all parents that Mr Zohrab is assisting. We eagerly await your learned decision. Just remember all Miss Clark has no values or morals where as Mr Zohrab has shown many that he is a credible person trying to address the many problem’s men face when confronted by a unfair system. If you fail as a law society to fulfil the obligation to be impartial and fair – then it simply underlines the need for a full public inquiry ??? For too long now judicial immunity has been based on the average citizen not knowing their rights and therefore the people who do, can not have their rights either.
    Stop the prejudice and corruption for the sake of so many good parents and sad children.
    dad4justice

  6. dpex says:

    Allow me to put my hand up as a financial contributor to a fighting fund to help Peter Zohrab.

    John, is there any chance you can get and post a copy of the WDLS’s decision?

    Cheers
    David.

  7. Aard V Atheian says:

    History will judge you harshly if you continue this newfound way to enslave your own citizens. This could well happen in your lifetime.
    In an internet age this is not too far fetched.
    Do it now before it’s too late, before you or your children will regret it.
    Before your own children will renounce you for the depravity that you so blithely exercising today in your ironic practice of Justice.

    I say restore Peter Zohrab to his rightful position of practicing lawyers of New Zealand.
    Do it now or live with its consequences forever.

  8. Bevan Berg says:

    The basis of this behaviour is that a women’s mind is a legal entity and yours is not. Your opinion doesn’t count. These people do not think in terms of matriarchal society, they think in terms of gynecocracy. You don’t factor in the decision making process. You may think their behaviour abhorrent, however in their mind they have acted correctly and legally. Until New Zealanders understand what they are voting for, individually more and more men will meet the face of this regime, without finding any accountability, or redress. You will never defeat them in their courts. Freedom will always be the vain dream of men who lack the virility to kill the tyrants of irrational control, and challenge the selfishness of what is ultimately the epitome of social self defeat.

  9. stan says:

    the more you give a woman… the less she thinks she has… and the more she grabs…
    that is the law of woman nature…this is in todays world known as womans rights…
    no longer will you find one who will sacrifice for the good of the family…only for self… when a male makes a stand against it or when someone stands for fathers and mens rights he is penalised.

    ethics say ‘discrimination’ …. a woman would probably say… ‘ i think not’… and the males are branded as never being able to understand a womans mind…

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

Since May 2016 this site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

« »

Powered by WordPress

Skip to toolbar