These people just get worse.

As some readers will remember, the mother in my case has withdrawn her case and attendent protection order.

CYFS case, such as it was to begin with, was founded on her ‘evidence’ aka false allegations. She has withdrawn from this position, which is a credit to her morality.

But now CYFS have decided that because the mother is refusing to ‘protect’ her daughter against me, then ‘she’ is clearly an unfit mother who just doesn’t realise CYFS are always right and that she really should reinstate her cases.

But Mother has informed all concerned, in writing, now on two separate occasions, that she withdraws. And so the witches need to find a way to force her to change her mind again.

And guess what they tried. Yup, they applied for an ex-parte custody order over the child. The plan, we believe, being, to grab the child, and shove her in some dismal CYFS home. How violent is that? These are the folk who assert they are out there to protect children!

For those unfamiliar with this mechanism, an ex-parte application is made (normally) when the applicant can ‘prove’ extreme and immediate danger. The applicant does so without warning or allowing the affected party any representation.

When my lawyer (Rod Hooker…and boy is he ever good at his job) discovered the application was before the judge, he fired off an opposition. Then he called the CYFS lawyer and asked for a copy of the application.

Apparently, within the halls of lawyership, there is a code of (dare I use the word) ethics requiring lawyers to cooperate, openly.

Not the CYFS lawyer. This dumb-bum tried to assert that Rod had no right to intervene because his client (me…the ogre) was not a party to the proceedings!

Eh? But I’m the reason they wanted the order….or was it?

Oh no. We now realise the game-plan was to simply grab the child, make her utterly miserable in some foul CYFS home, then let mother experience her daughters’ misery and invite her to terminate her daughters’ pain ….”But oh, by the way, you will have to reinstate your case first.’ How violent is that????

I have upheld my voluntary restriction of staying away from the child’s school and her swimming club till the full case is heard and we finally show CYFS up for the viscious time and money-wasters that they are.

And so what would they have to gain from filing for an ex-parte custody order? Exactly as stated. These vile, viscious women are misusing process in an attempt to force the mother to reinstate her false allegations!!! Thus they are now, potentially, parties to an attempt to pervert the course of justice.

Now that is truly violent.

BTW: As at the close of court tonight, they didn’t get their custody order.

But, at least, their attempt is now going to force the court to arraign the parties for a sunstantive hearing…the very last thing the CYFSterhood want

Lastly, I’ve never heard Mr Hooker angry. But I heard it tonight. I’d sure hate to be the CYFS lawyer and the CYFS social worker who got involved. I won’t disclose what he is about to do. One never knows; the evil-ones may visit this site, and I’d hate to give them a heads-up on what’s coming at them, but it ain’t pretty. Save to say, some people who truly believe they are inviolate to the laws of process are in deep shit. Good, eh? :–))

Just wait till Dyson gets a load of this!

Cheers
David