Donna Oh We’re Teary
Jesus but how sick is this?
This maggot and her fat husband nick vast sums from the very kids they assert to be helping, and sundry ‘ruined’ (read all pakeha men are bastards) maori women gather round to give the fraudster a rousing welcome home.
This has got to be the sickest bit of injustice I have ever seen. I thought the injustice against me was bad, but it pales into insignificance compared to Huata’s relief.
Once again a female ‘victim’ of circumstance gets a free lunch.
‘My husband might have left me if I hadn’t had the stomach staple at the expense of the kids. And then I would have been bereft. And then what would have happened to the kids?’
This is the sickest judgement ever seen.
The shame on the parole board for allowing it is a stain which should last forever.
All it has done (the Parole Board) is assert that lying bitch women have some form of excuse for their vile behaviour.
And whom, once again suffer? Yup! The kids. The kids who will never get what they so need from the funding the Huatas plundered for their own use.
I am soooooo angry about this.
David.
David,
I am sorry to say but I don’t think this is about her being a female. But I don’t want to comment my thoughts on this. What I am wondering though is: Does she and her husband get to keep all the money they ripped off? Do they have to pay legal aid back?
Comment by julie — Tue 16th May 2006 @ 9:01 pm
It was reported in the news a few days ago that she is developing a reading programme for inmates. No bull.
And it appears inmates have a bigger attention span than little school kiddies.
5 minutes as opposed to the 4 minutes they got.
Guess she’ll be applying for some govt funding to get her underway …
Comment by Al D Rado — Tue 16th May 2006 @ 9:46 pm
Al D Rado,
I can understand why you wrote, “No Bull”
It is hard to believe she will be trusted with anything let alone her word. Her creditability should be worthless after what she has done.
She must think NZ a joke and be confident of it, if she is already making plans to spend more money.
Comment by julie — Tue 16th May 2006 @ 10:22 pm
how come this peice of shite gets to go home with her husband? Why wasnt she held to the “approved” system where she gets escorted home by “security drivers” and why was she allowed to be free without “approved” supervision and without ankle bracelet at all times? And considering the news stated they both (her and husband) have appeals on their convictions yet to happen does this not show they both are in denial of their offending? and does this not go against the very core of requirements for home detention? And,, why was she “paroled” to the very address where some of the offending took place?
Comment by peter — Wed 17th May 2006 @ 10:00 am
as you put it Peter this piece of shite… why is she allowed to go home to her husband !! In spite of her ripping off the government she still has the right like all other inmates who apply for Home Detention to be back with her family and move forward, altho I do agree with Richard Prebbles comment in the Herald this morning that she still thinks she did no wrong and that is not acceptable for her rehabilitation in the community if she thinks she did no wrong then she will re-offend to say the least. I think it is bullshit she will be developing a reading programme for inmates they have all the sources for that themselves it is just her way of making the Parole Board jump out and look at what this woman wants to achieve on her Home Detention time… and doubt she will ever get Government Funding again….She lives in a fantasy world and thats why she had her stomach stapled so her criminal husband would not leave her.. more to the least why did he not spend time inside and she did??? A case a bit like Darryn McDonalds dont you think??
Comment by Marg — Wed 17th May 2006 @ 3:39 pm