Background.

Jason and Vikki have been doing fighting with Jason’s Ex, impressions.

Vikki sets up a vid-cam to record the next visit of the Ex, the collect the child.

Vikki loses it. But thinks the vid will help to get Gill to see the nature of the Ex.

Gill sees evidence supporting the Ex, so he produces the vid in court. Jason and Vikki are his clients, not the Ex.

He asserts he just ‘had too’ on account of he’s an officer of the court.

Turns out CYF wrote a report on the Ex, highlighting her less than lucid state. Gill refuses to produce this in court.

Then, at the eleventh hour (Jason and Vikki are up for a final judgement, whereupon Jason will lose his son unless something good happens) Gill files to remove himself from the case!

What Gill didn’t factor into his bizarre performance was, this site, me, and Hooker.

Yup! Hooker is on the case.

My letter to Gill.

Hi Steve,

You don’t know me, but I think I know you.

Jason and Vikki tell me you produced a defamatory video to the FC on account of you had to because you’re an officer of the court. That it helped to tarnish their case is not your issue, is it? After all, you’re an officer of the court. The fact the court wasn’t paying you but Jason and Vikki were, to properly represent them, seems to have escaped your understanding.

Well, by the time Jason and Vikki finish suing you through the WDLS for failing in your fiduciary duty toward your client, we will all be most interested to see exactly how much of an officer of the court you are.

My guess is, you’re actually a legal fringe-dweller. A small bug which comes out under the cover of darkness to sup on the efforts of the bigger bugs.

They further tell me you failed/refused to present CYF evidence of crucial value to your client.

And then they tell me you bugged out on them within 48 hours of their most crucial hearing.

Do you have an answer for any this, Steve?

Of course you don’t. You’re just another boy who will soon be the subject of our attentions and, of course, that of the WDLS. And so we will just have to resile to lawful protest.

Welcome to our list, Steve. You deserve to be here.

And know this. Hooker is now on the case of your earstwhile clients. And Hooker will have much to say about your performance.

I almost feel sorry for you now that Hooker’s on the case.:–))

Cheers
David.