- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -
Leeanna Marie Hodgetts, 39, seduced, raped and abucted a child. However you will never see the NZ media report it that way. You certainly will never see NZ courts treat it that way.
The reason? Leeanna Marie Hodgetts, is a female.
And in NZ the feminist ideology is far more important than any amount of damage inflicted on children.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10847798
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.
This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.
Contact me for rates
NZ teacher Peter Joyce’s settled life was disrupted when a woman he had never met accused him of historic rape. With a unique brand of angry humour, his diary plots the stages of his despair and traces his attempts to find justice in the face of the current insistence that we must “believe the victim”.
Dry Ice is a compelling memoir, but much more. The accusation made the writer a reluctant expert on similar cases from all over the world. He throws light on everything that limits public knowledge of false sexual allegations, from dangerous counselling to flawed statistics, and he exposes police investigation methods as blinkered, inefficient and insensitive.
You can purchase Dry Ice on Kindle for just $6.00 here: https://www.amazon.com/Dry-Ice-Peter-Joyce-ebook/dp/B01N19JKAR
Peter Joyce writes a blog: www.blackstonesdrum.com
Oh I see, when a woman does it, it is a “relationship”
Comment by Scott B — Fri 16th November 2012 @ 10:00 am
Yes, when a woman does it it’s a ‘relationship’, the child is ‘the girl’ rather than ‘the victim’ and emphasis is put on the child’s cooperation with the offending and her infatuation with the abuser (oh, sorry, when it’s a woman the term ‘abuser’ isn’t used at all, she’s a ‘mother of two’). Quite frankly, if this offender were a man and he deliberately stated that he was going on the run with his victim because he might as well make any jail worth it, he would be referred to as an abuser, offender, kidnapper, monster, beast. Feminist groups would be on the media complaining that everyone let the victim down by not intervening earlier, attributing this to patriarchal power and control, and demanding ever more draconian laws to stop these terrible offenders. But the only feminist voices we are likely to hear about this female offender will be excuses, minimization and probably blaming some man in her life.
It is unusual though that she has been remanded in custody and she has actually been charged with ‘abduction’. I suspect a man would have been charged with ‘sexual violation’ with a maximum penalty of 20 years jail rather than the ‘sexual connection’ with a maximum penalty of 10 years jail that this female beast has been charged with. After all, there was probably digital penetration etc which defines sexual violation (when a male does it).
Regardless, we can be sure this particular beast because she doesn’t have a penis will get the usual pussy pass when it comes to an actual sentence. We wait with bated breath for sentencing on December 11.
Comment by Luther Blissett — Fri 16th November 2012 @ 11:18 am
Somehow men will be to blame.
Comment by Scott B — Fri 16th November 2012 @ 1:45 pm
i wonder if she is any relation to darren hodgetts..the non sworn police officer busted for using a police computer to assist the running of a drug ring..maybe she could blame him for having the same name
Comment by Ford — Tue 20th November 2012 @ 5:30 pm