The Labour Party’s War On Men
Please invite all your friends to like and share, locally and internationally, to raise awareness on this upcoming issue in this country.
MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.
8 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.
This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.
I think its more of a government-led worldwide war on me in order to disenfranchise men and allow the government to use feminism to control us all by bringing in Police-State Laws using the excuse of the ‘domestic violence’ and ‘child abuse’ lies.
No legitimate statistics required for sheeple as they have short attention spans and a lynch mob sadistic bullying mentality by and large. The popularity of the bully chef shows on TV is a perfect example most sheeple look up to bullys.
Comment by Phil Watts — Sat 12th July 2014 @ 1:32 pm
I am taking significant action against former FCJ VonDadelszen and request any person with credible evidence to show he has acted in a manner unbecoming of a FCJ to contact me asap, I will also be exposing Boshier, Callinicos and Ryan as well as Bruce Andrews.
Comment by Ritchie Camden — Mon 14th July 2014 @ 7:14 am
I myself cringe at the emotional turmoil I experienced in hearing Boshier talk about Domestic Violence on the mass media (propaganda tool)that is radio. Search DJ Ward posts on this sight. It provides tools to gain power and control over any FCJ.
You must however check your desires for justice or revenge etc, with realism.
Comment by The man in Absentia — Sat 19th July 2014 @ 9:01 pm
Dear The man in Absentia, please put in a direct reference?
Did you mean:
Judge wants domestic violence made criminal offence 1 November 2012
Govt idle on idea of domestic violence charge 4 June 2013
The National Government seem to be sceptical about making dangerous knee-jerk reaction legislation, thank goodness.
Their ethical strength and integrity is more invested in increasing financial returns from drug and alcohol sales and gambling and protecting these manufacturers and retailers from accountability to the public and consumers. Noble indeed?
Although I detest judge bashier, I have been told that he played a large part in putting clauses in Care of Children Act 2004 to protect a child’s right to good quality relationships with their own family.
Even if these clauses are laughed at in familycaught$ in the pursuit of other people’s money, they were a world class achievement in academic child protection. Also bashier has been more proactive in protecting children’s relationships in actual decisions, on add occasions, than the other judges (just not when I wanted it!) He may have had spectacularly little influence over the behaviour of the other financial extractors, sorry I mean judges….but he tried a bit.
(Election coming up —–) Oh for a crook who could run NZ ethically?
By The Way, did you notice how many people were at the NZ marches against Israel’s military response to Hamas?
Comment by MurrayBacon — Sun 20th July 2014 @ 10:50 am
Judge Boshier was a figure head for the white ribbon campaign. I don’t know myself what he has or hasn’t done in a personnel context. It is wrong for me to attack him for things I know nothing of.
He said on the radio that 96% of protection orders were taken out by women to protect them from the behaviour of men. He said this is something men have to take responsibility for.
Obviously this is something that triggers my own emotional responses. It is something that fits the statement “apologist crap”
Comment by The man in Absentia — Sun 20th July 2014 @ 11:07 am
I wonder how many of those 96% protection orders taken out by women I need to take responsibility for. I swear I wasn’t even there!
Comment by OMG! You're *(&^*$^&* — Sun 20th July 2014 @ 11:36 am
Hamas and Israel.
one is throwing a stone. The other picks it up and throws it back. etc etc
Like any irrational domestic violence between two parties.
Israel is committing an act of oppression/genocide.
The international community must act against the one with power and control to break the cycle of violence.
Comment by The man in Absentia — Sun 20th July 2014 @ 11:44 am
90% of the ‘Protection’ Orders taken out by women and awarded by corrupt and/or anti-male Judges and policed by anti-male police bullies are actually unecessary and full of lies and/or paranoia or psychosis by females.
‘Protection’ Orders are a breach of human rights and should never be given without a jury conviction of physical violence against the ‘protected’ person.
‘Protection Orders’ are the worst form of child abuse as they separate children and fathers who love each other and are taken out by vindictive hateful selfish mothers.
Comment by sane in an insane world — Sun 20th July 2014 @ 12:04 pm