Isn’t that a blow to the Banks
John Banks, known to some of us as a passionate supporter of Fathers, refused a DNA test.
If you were a father, would you not want to know?
Help me out here, is the estate, or pride, or something, more important than your own offspring.
I’m having a bit of trouble with this one, especially after my personal interactions with this political force.
John Banks found to be a father
Denial can sometimes mean “I dont want to face the truth
Comment by Patrick Manning — Fri 1st September 2017 @ 7:08 pm
Unless a test is taken one can only assume the worst
Comment by Patrick Manning — Fri 1st September 2017 @ 7:17 pm
If a man is uncomfortable with that truth, then we have a problem.
Comment by Downunder — Fri 1st September 2017 @ 7:25 pm
He may have been save by a male contraceptive pill…….We can cure a lot of cancers, fly objects to Mars and Kim ung-yong can now nuke the USA but for an unknown reason we can’t seem to find a simple solution to neutralise sperm. If men hold all the power and one single sperm in the wrong place can f**k up your whole life then that’s a mystery worth thinking about!
Comment by Jack — Fri 1st September 2017 @ 10:17 pm
First media comment I’ve seen on this post.
Comment by Downunder — Thu 7th September 2017 @ 1:31 pm
As usual and as much as you can expect from STUFF, the comments are manufactured opinion – they are quite happy being the bullshit editors of New Zealand opinion.
If ‘Banks is a disgrace’ so are the pathetic bitches that run this can-of-crap net-mag.
Comment by Downunder — Thu 7th September 2017 @ 3:02 pm