Alienated from Life
The previous post is a discussion about parental alienation surfacing as a world issue and how some New Zealand citizens have taken it upon themselves to express an opinion on behalf of our country.
An older post, Crusade for Free Speech discusses the role this issue played in undermining the essence of a democratic parliament, and a New Zealand parliament in particular.
It is particularly relevant to Fathers and men who value the importance of free speech.
Within our parliamentary system are select committees; their role is inquire and consider evidence with an obligation to report to the House of Representatives. If you have read the posts linked to, you will have noticed that a senior lawyer who was asked about this didn’t say they should have or could have, he said “ought to have”.
Their duty and obligation was to hear the evidence bought to the committee; they put forward an excuse of natural justice, that some minimum standard required them to reject and not consider this evidence, as this might reflect badly on one woman.
In considering free speech there is a central argument of who benefits from that disclosure. The select committee concerned had a duty to consider the validity of this evidence, not refuse to hear it, not burn the book, or put up an excuse rather than explain it’s reasons for censorship of that evidence.
The benefit given to one woman should not exclude any benefit to the country’s children, past present or future. This goes against the judicial decisions of both our superior courts and the Privy Council.
The members of this committee showed a blatant disregard for democracy, that is worthy of an inquiry.
It was unfortunate that media painted this primarily as a father’s rights issue, and trivalised the event to a protest of what is often referred to as ‘a few disgruntled men’. It wasn’t. It was much more.
Describe that how you want, but at least condemn it for the organised failure that it was.
The Select Committee is the top Court of the New Zealand Queen’s administration. That mean if there is lying and cheating going on that is (check the bill of rights) it would be demonstrable in that Court.
Ask me – but I would go on for about 18 years worth of dialogue, but better ask Bevan about being seen in the Select Committee and if you need any proof that the committee is riddled with the feminist jurisprudence lying and cheating then search Craig Jackson’s name fairly recently.
New Zealand folk is the very heart of corruption.
Comment by Benjamin Morland Easton — Fri 26th July 2019 @ 4:47 pm
Persecution Revenge Utu not settling up at the time, all these things are persecution.
The prosecution is to ensure completeness including forgiveness where necessary.
When we get this right people no longer carry their grief and stay down under.
Comment by Downunder — Sat 27th July 2019 @ 1:19 am
The execution is not the death penalty, it’s a public execution for education.
That process shouldn’t kill people literally or financially.
Education is the process of getting this correct, and the site is realising it’s potential.
Comment by Downunder — Sat 27th July 2019 @ 1:28 am
I think you are mixing things around to accommodate the right to be white implementing all of those instruments required to sustain convention.
The proper formula is human dna’. Male female child. Science now instead is given right to overthrow the dna – through select committees and lobbyists.
When the relationship between two consenting adults producing child or children breaks down the remedy as to protect those born from the adults – is social – community. No interference can be permitted where the individual given the authority from some alien process written to whatever script, according to the want or principles of the alien author is manifestly corrupt and the remedy to stop that corruption has to be militated if the alien does not know how to leave.
Sadly the alien has been doing this for centuries by convention and of course there are so many aliens no-one now knows how to leave. The formula is simple. male female child.
Comment by Benjamin Morland Easton — Sat 27th July 2019 @ 5:45 am
Is it just the process of civilization where one group is 10,000 years behind the other.
Comment by Boonie — Sat 27th July 2019 @ 6:41 am