- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -

MENZ.org.nz Logo First visit to MENZ.org.nz? Here's our introduction page.

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Tue 6th June 2017

Discharge of Protection Order

Filed under: General — telemachus85 @ 10:48 am

My ex partner took out a protection order and I challenged it as she accused me of several things but as it always goes I lost and it became final …. I breached the temporary protection order by communicating with her online and sending her texts as I wanted to assure her I meant no harm was convicted and fined for it.

From there on I decided I need to let it go as she is vicious and can just destroy my life so now it’s been 4.5 years I never ever contacted her or go in the area where I think I might bump into her. I applied to courts to lift the order as I have been in a steady relationship for last 2 years and have no desire to contact her anymore. I received a letter that she has engaged a lawyer and going to file a defence. What do you think are my chances of getting the order lifted as I just want to move on in my life. Is it worth contesting it or try again in 2-3 years time? I was advised by community lawyer that if 3 years have elapsed it is a good time in my case it’s been 4.5 years already… Any suggestions

27 Responses to “Discharge of Protection Order”

  1. DJ Ward says:

    Depends how much the protection order affects your life.
    If it affects your options for employment.
    Or something else that in real terms affects your life.
    Then it may be worth trying to get it discharged.

    If it has no effect on your life including psychological.
    Then it’s a worthless piece of paper.

    There is always a risk that you will accidentally bump into her resulting in your arrest.
    For that reason follow through with what’s happening.
    Attempt to get rid of the protection order.
    Just avoid spending money.
    IE don’t feed the parasites. (lawyers)

  2. Downunder says:

    The difficulty in applying for a discharge is that this order was given to the woman. It’s her civil order, by which you were criminally convicted, and criminally recorded.

    An application to discharge the protection order is a request to take it off her.

    Regardless of why you want the discharge, understanding that is a good place to start.

  3. dom says:

    Yes apply to discharge the protection order as it might take many months to even get to court , i was told by my lawyers she would have to prove why she needed it to remain , but after 3 years it was removed by consent , if you are dealing with a vindictive bitch then its time to remove the noose thats always ever present there,for your own sake and your future, bearing in mind that the court will possibly ask for both of you to come in and explain and be satisfied shes not in danger, which as you know is all based on how she “feels” nothing more, good luck !

  4. Downunder says:

    If you’re dealing with a vindictive bitch it’s time to remove the noose

    Getting rid of a protection order, doesn’t get rid of her. I can asure you that while I have lived without a protection order for 17 years, after 20 years I am still pursued by her and her band of legal demons – they are always willing helpers.

  5. dom says:

    @ down under, yes you are right, Once a vidictive piece of trash always a vindictive piece of trash, let me clarify what i meant,

    I meant, if you can get it removed , she has no / a lot less power over you anymore, when it comes to her “feelings” its a lot harder to get the police to bust down your door and leave you overnight in a cell for “technical breeches”

  6. hornet says:

    Walk away, second thoughts …..RUN AWAY don’t waste another day in the family court scam – you are well rid of her, get a trespass order against her if she continues to harass YOU ….. I did against mine and it worked a treat especially when the cops were turning up on her doorstep and not mine!!!!! Isolate and ignore – they really hate that …….

    Take care of those important in your life.

    Enjoy your new partner and don’t waste another second even thinking about the past.

    You can NOT change history, you were snookered by the system, lesson learnt – don’t ever go back for more – the system wants more conflict, don’t support it.

  7. Max says:

    Hello Guys thanks heaps!

    I have definitely moved away from her mentally as well as emotionally and have no desire to ever contact her. It was a very unhappy time for me. I requested incident reports from the police for last 4.5 years and it shows that she has not laid any incidents which proves that I have moved on and she hasn’t it seems like and she plans to contest it and defend.

    I have been seeking advise for community law which is a free service. As everyone has said I just want to get rid of that piece of paper so that she can not use it again to wreck my life. I mean when I breached it I was only fined so no prison or anything and I learnt a lot from that.

    Has she got any grounds apart from the history to go on and tell the judge she wants the order to be in place ?? I was reading few recent case notes and judge said her fear is not a valid reason for the protection order to remain in place, there has to be an objective reason with tangible evidence for the order to not be discharged… please do shed some light

  8. Downunder says:

    I think there comes a point where it is not fear, but obsession.

    A morbid desire to continue the fight through the agency of lawyers and the court, because she is not able to do this through you.

    Not that you should try and say that, but hopefully that is the conclusion that is drawn.

    The difficulty as I am all too well aware, is that the incompetentant, irresponsible or purile behavior of some legal workers, leaves even the woman unable to extract herself from a situation where they are defending their own sillyness.

  9. Rocky says:

    Max, Can you list or quote the cases where you have seen judges make comments or rulings about ‘needing objective reasons’ or ‘what constituents fear’.
    I have tried once to get PO removed and want to lodge every yr, do the matter myself, till its gone. Ta

  10. Max says:

    Hi Rocky please follow this link –


    I went to see the lawyer today and she said she was really surprised to see that she wanted to defend the order from being lifted. I got an incident report from the police that there has been no complaints filed by her over the last 4.5 years and it clearly indicates that she is being vicious now and not letting me move on in my life

  11. golfa says:

    #10 Max, I believe that Judge is the ONLY Judge who has jailed a Mother (twice, if memory serves me) for failing to comply with a Court Order to allow the child to see the Father.

  12. MurrayBacon says:

    The Poindexter judgement seems to have the parties actual names, yet has been put on the familycaught$ website.
    Is that due to carelessness by the judge, or registrar has put wrong copy on website, or has there been a change in laws?
    (Personally, I think that whenever the coercive power of Government is called into play, real names should be published.)
    Thieves and clowns……

  13. MrFatsworth says:

    These women, don’t like the changes to family court procedures, procedures that are well overdue, and still very slow in response to fathers being treated unjustly.

  14. Buster says:

    Max@ 10

    Bloody brilliant and thank you for posting that one

    Absolutely A typical of f….. women using the system to deny access to children by the father.

    I think that its about time that the Family Court be made to go Public with outcomes and you will find
    A. the number of applications drop by 90%
    B. Claims of assault and abuse drop by 80%
    C. Time spent on custody issues drop by 80%

    If a bond is paid $2,000 -$5,000 to the court so if either party gets caught out for deception, deceit or provocation by way of false allegations then the opposing party gets the BOND.

    This is how you take away POWER from the system, however what will happen is

    Courts will become less congested
    Lawyers will not be able to make money
    Judges will be far more accountable
    Families will be under less duress

    Bingo – separation becomes a fairer and equitable objective.
    Fathers become more in tune with life and liberty, show structure and support to children as the burden of debt is removed.

    I also believe that if caught a second time-custody becomes imminent to the other party as the children no longer become pawns.

    Please don’t say ” Who can afford that” amount of bond!!!

    Easy – its called carrot and stick methodology, and if you love your kids then YOU WILL find a way

  15. Man X Norton says:

    Yes, most FC judgments are interesting and elucidating to read. Openness in our ‘justice’ system would keep us all aware of its operation and would reduce the incidents that lead to its involvement, because the public would become increasingly aware of what behaviours end up there, how those behaviours are interpreted in Court and the consequences. The Family Court’s default secrecy of operation is a scandal and the justification for this, the privacy of children and litigants, is of questionable merit. Aside from low accountability and other problems, such secrecy actually serves to maintain the tap of lucrative business for the FC and its profiteers.

    The FAM-2010-079-000128 case referred to in comment 10 was interesting in many ways. Firstly, the protection order was imposed without any physical violence but was on the basis of threats to kill. Sure, that’s serious and a criminal offence that can result in imprisonment up to 7 years (which many people seem not to know). But realistically, most threats to kill are not genuine intentions but expressions of high frustration and anger. Such threats are often throw-away comments in conflict situations, and if made by someone who has no history of committing violent acts will often be no more significant than the slamming of a door. The criminalization and ability to punish regarding such threats may be justified but the idea that they necessarily amount to psychological violence justifying the need for a ‘protection’ order is invalid, ideological and will often result in institutional child abuse through depriving the children of a full relationship with their father. Of course, when a woman in an argument with her ex says “I swear I’ll kill you if you say that again”, the FC will be likely to view that as a throw-away comment and will be very unlikely to impose a protection order against her.

    The FAM-2010-079-000128 case also appeared to demonstrate the anti-male sexism routinely practised by our police. They were prosecuting the father for breaching a parenting order! How often to we hear of mothers being prosecuted for breaching parenting orders, something they nearly all seem to do and believe they have a right to do? When a father goes to police about his children being kept hostage by their mother contrary to a parenting order, preventing him seeing the children as required by that parenting order, what do police typically do? “That’s a civil matter sir, and you will need to get the Family Court to issue an enforcement order before we can do anything.” But it seems when a mother complains to police that the father has breached the parenting order, police get on their white-knight steeds and prosecute the father. Even though the father is in the weaker parenting position and the mother herself has breached the parenting order by limiting and interfering with his ordered contact with his children. Incredible.

    However, FAM-2010-079-000128 does provide further evidence of the changing tide, in this case the FC attempting to nurture, protect and respect a father’s relationship with his children and calling out the provocation, vindictiveness and low sense of responsibility for bad behaviour shown by a female litigant.

  16. martin says:

    telemachus85 – I’m in agreement with hornet – keep the beast wear it with pride and buy yourself some new tyres or a new car depending upon what you were intending to spend. You can always crash the car into a wall if you change you mind – same result.

  17. allan harvey says:

    I have a small campaign in the Wellington area seeking to discharge 10 Protection Orders. We are learning with each hearing. Allan

  18. Max says:

    #17 Allan please share your email and other contact details please

    Would love to hear the learnings and experiences please.
    Thanks heaps

  19. Max says:

    Hi Guys,

    So acting in the advice of the Senior lawyer from community law.. I filed my affidavit for discharge on 2nd May and the assessment date was set for 31st May when I heard from the court that she only strayed to act on it on 17th May and have seeked a counsel and the counsel has seeked extension till 15th June. 15th June came and went and they have failed to file an affidavit/Notice of defence and the reason given by the registrar was oh they didn’t get in time the Ministry of Justice report with regards to when I breached the order I.e contacted her via online and text messages5 years ago and was also made a passing comment that if you have a lawyer system favours you more and the judge has given them the weekend to file the affidavit now. How unfair it is and the justice system is so biased anything I can do or challenge ?

  20. martin says:

    Max, are you talking about challenging her defence based on the technicalities of late filing etc? If this is the case I wouldn’t bother – she will likely get a defended hearing as that’s just the way it is. I would stick to your application based upon any hardships it carries – evidence of discrimination in work, having to avoid her street, etc, etc and of course the length of time it has been since she has raised anything with the police.

    I’ve only skim read the thread, but why was it you wanted the PO lifted again?

  21. Max says:

    #20…. thanks Martin…. I have received a letter from the police that since 2013 Feb. when the final protection order was made there have been no incidents reported.iIt has now been 5 years. I have moved on and in a very stable job, bought my house, in a relationship for last 2.5 years and have never contacted her and have taken all the precautions to avoid going to any area where she lives, works or socialises. I want to apply for my citizenship and it requires by law if there is any existing protection order and if not has it been discharged and my aunt is terminally ill and having a NZ passport will assist me in traveling if something was to happen to her and most importantly I want the order to be done and dusted and move on properly and do not want it to be a hindrance in me moving on properly it was an unhappy chapter for me from which I have moved on and this is just the final piece in the puzzle

  22. martin says:

    Hi Max,
    It’s really up to you – having a PO doesn’t mean you won’t get citizenship ( am I correct ?). I don’t want to sound condescending but a PO is for life in NZ, unless you go to court. The fact that you ex wife is opposing it is more significant than you staying away from her and wanting to move on unfortunately – I don’t write the rules.
    Having said that, going to a defended hearing doesn’t necessarily mean she will win. If it was me, I would emphasise that you have avoided any conflict with her for 5 years. Can you tell me why she is opposing it?

  23. Buster says:

    The Department of Internal Affairs will definitely have access to that information Max, Immigration and probably one other because it is lodged with the Police.

    If you want citizenship then find out from the Police by making a request for information on you, then go from there.

    Just remember, your ex knows then so does her lawyer!

  24. Max says:

    Hello Martin,

    I am aware of the PO staying for life but I just want to move on and close that unhappy chapter of my life and have nothing to do with her even if I accidentally bumped into her I don’t want her to use it against me.
    The reason why she is opposing it is based around 2013 events and there is nothing new around it. It’s historic for last 5 years there has been no contact or any sort of confrontation as I have moved on and clearly she hasn’t it seems like. If it was discharged internal affairs looks at it more positively than if it was still there. There is nothing in terms of any incidents or anything to suggest that ongoing protection is required by her

  25. Max says:

    I have received a written letter from the police suggesting that there has been no incidents at all reported by her since 2013 which clearly states that there has been no further contact or any intention from my side to do anything with regards to her and not do I want anything to do with her.

  26. martin says:

    Max, I tried for 2.5 years to get rid of mine, and it was only dropped when she consented to have it dropped. All cases are different so good luck with it. Even if you get it dropped, it doesn’t take much for her to get it back again.

  27. Max says:

    Hello All,

    I have now received her notice of defence which very weak. She alleges that I send her flowers and anonymous emails with no proof attached to her affidavit and goes on to say she reported it to police.
    I have got a letter from the police saying there have been no further incidents since the order was made final. She also goes on to allege that I have taken my new bank job to look into her bank accounts hahahaha she is paranoid and crazy. It’s straight away going to hearing. She has attached no evidence of any emails or police reports.

    I have letter from police stating no further incidents have been reported and various letters saying I have done voluntary counselling and made positive changes letters from work my Manager family and friends giving me character reference and her fear is unreasonable and subjective.
    Any suggestions? I am going to the hearing

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

Since May 2016 this site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

« »

Powered by WordPress

Skip to toolbar