MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Better deal for [Australian] divorced dads

Filed under: Child Support — JohnPotter @ 9:31 pm Wed 15th June 2005

A radical new formula for calculating how much divorced parents should contribute to raising their children is the centrepiece of an overhaul of the nation’s child support system to be released today.

Under the more controversial of two models being proposed, the biological parents’ incomes would be combined and fathers would then pay a percentage of the cost of raising their child, irrespective of how much they earned.

Under new formulas being proposed, both parents would contribute a percentage of the cost of raising their child based on how many nights a child spent in their care.

The most radical plan would see the cost of raising a child calculated at a standardised rate and applied to all children of divorced parents, regardless of their income.

Many fathers to pay less child support

Single mothers’ groups reacted angrily while lone fathers cautiously welcomed yesterday’s release of the recommendations made by a Federal Government taskforce.

The changes would recognise the time both parents spend caring for their children. A non-residential parent – usually the father – who looks after the children for at least 14 per cent of nights each year could pay less child support in recognition of the costs involved.

About 60 per cent of parents currently providing child support, mostly men, would pay less than they do now under the recommendations.

The president of the Shared Parenting Council of Australia, Michael Green, welcomed the recommendations as a “monumental achievement”.

“For the first time, the mother’s income is assessed in the same manner as the father’s, acknowledging the principle that both parents are responsible for the upkeep of children,” Mr Green said.

But the president of the Sole Parents Union, Kathleen Swinbourne, said there was too little in the report to force people to pay a fairer amount when they under-estimated their income to avoid their obligations.

Download the Taskforce Report:
‘In the Best Interests of Children – Reforming the Child Support Scheme’


  1. So how about it Helen & Co? Can a system that puts the childrens best interests first instead of the the custodian work in NZ? Not while you are in control I bet.

    Comment by Mark Lloyd — Thu 16th June 2005 @ 9:00 am

  2. Hey! be careful! read the full is really just a continuation of the old system. A wolf in a new sheep skin. ANd fathers are the sheep.

    The fundamental principle of the new system is the separated parents incomes are combined and the parent earning more pays the other. There is little that gives both parents equal rights or children the right to have equal time with both parents.

    Comment by Nik — Thu 16th June 2005 @ 8:57 pm

  3. Dads in Dustress needs to get the outcomes of application of the complex formulaic system the task force fully analysed.

    This model is still flawed. Its based on capacity to pay and its key focus is not costs of children, but still beifit recovery.

    Shared Parenting is the solution not a formula approach that does not address the real issues udelying child support.

    Comment by Scrap_The_CSA — Wed 22nd June 2005 @ 4:30 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar