MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Muriel Newman on motherhood

Filed under: General — JohnPotter @ 4:20 pm Mon 14th February 2005

from Neman Online

Helen Clark’s call to get mothers out of the kitchen and back into the workplace failed to strike an empathetic note. As commentators were quick to point out, it had the ring of a communist clarion call. Socialists, of course, firmly believe that a woman’s place is at work and not in the home. They regard women as child-bearers, not child-rearers, and believe that the all-important role of raising children should be carried out by the state in government-controlled child-care centres.

Underpinning this socialist worldview is a realisation that once children are released from the protective embrace of nurturing parents into the arms of state institutions, there is nothing to save them from the brainwashing necessary to keep the socialist flame alive.

This strategy was highly successful in Communist Russia last century. By 1920, in some cities upwards of 90 percent of families were living in state hostels, eating in communal kitchens, and sleeping in segregated quarters. The role of parents was to bear the children, and the role of the state, to raise them.

2 Responses to “Muriel Newman on motherhood”

  1. Morris Lindsay says:

    We once had one of the best countries in the world. That was when women stayed at home and loved and raised the children. Divorce was unheard of. Crime and violence was unheard of. Children grew up to respect their parents and abided by the law. The country was rich in every respect.

    So what the hell happened?

  2. Sunil says:

    There seem to be so people around who are experts on socialism, who appear never top have talked with anyone who identifies as socialist.

    Grand conflations have always helped as a rhetorical device, in order to gain support for the expert class.
    Grand conflations have never helped anyone clearly understand a complex issue, though.

    Uh, wait a second – its a Muriel Newman comment.
    It all makes sense now…

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar