MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Police chase woman for false rape complaint costs

Filed under: Law & Courts — triassic @ 1:53 pm Sat 14th May 2005

NZ Herald 14/5/05

Police are seeking nearly $5000 from a woman they claim wasted their time over a false rape complaint.

The case highlights a dilemma for police, who do not want to discourage women from reporting sexual abuse.

But they say that when an accusation is blatantly untrue, they will lay a charge of making a false complaint and seek reparation for investigation costs.

Detective Senior Sergeant Richard Middleton, of the Manukau Crime Squad, said that of 75 sexual complaints in his area since Christmas, about 10 were believed fake.

“But we would only charge them with making a false complaint where the complaint was clearly false,” he said.

A handful of women have faced prosecution.

One claimed she had been kidnapped, raped and locked in the boot of a car.

Police sought reparation from her to cover about 40 hours of police time at $80 an hour, plus medical expenses, which can be up to $1500.

In the current case, which has yet to come to court, it is understood police want the woman to pay for more that 50 hours of officers’ time plus medical expenses.

Mr Middleton said detectives sometimes interviewed women who spun a web of lies to “cover up indiscretions” or simply to seek publicity.

He said police took complaints of this “abhorrent crime” very seriously, but false complaints were “not acceptable”.

This report leaves a lot of unanswered questions for me…… the most important being “where is the victims story here?” The police do a job and get paid regardless, however the poor bastard who gets labled with a false rape allegation can have his life destroyed. Waisting police time is a minor offence in comparison. As all men are rapists I suppose I am just being a bit sensitive.

1 Comment »

  1. raises an interesting question – namely, how do you tell if the obligation is false – and a tangential issue – namely, ‘what is rape’?

    if a man and a woman both get really drunk and end up going home together, and the woman wants sex, and the man doesn’t, but she’s too drunk to interpret what he’s saying, and he’s too drunk to clearly articulate what’s being said, so she ends up having sex with him .. is that rape?

    is it reasonable to allow someone to argue drunkenness in this kind of situation?

    Comment by damian — Tue 17th May 2005 @ 4:48 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar