MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

It’s a rainbow alright!

Filed under: General — Julie @ 11:05 am Tue 7th October 2008

There has been one thing in particular that has stayed in my mind for the time I have known about men’s plight in New Zealand. It was told to me when I confronted some leaders of a well to do group in Auckland and argued that I think boys should be allowed to climb trees and be risk takers and fall over and scrape their knees and I think girls should be allowed to play with dolls and tea sets if they want to.

The arguments back were …. well, there wasn’t any because young men were around and spoke up themselves saying they liked being masculine. Why does a hairstyle have to be more important to males than being rough and tough? What is so wrong with sport and what is so wrong with not showing emotions all the time?

Anyhow, the sentence that I will never forget is, “I hope men don’t fall in line because that is the day we have socialism”.

Yeap, that is it alright. Communism is socialism and communism is where everything is under the control of a hierarchy of its own. But this hierarchy is a few leaders giving the information to the king of a country and then that king provides the information to the one quarter of the world king who in turn gives it the main king which is the leader of the world. We in NZ are under the Asian/Pacific Union.

– North American Union – Amero
– European Union – Euro
– African Union
– Asian Union

– One World Government – One World Currency

“We shall have World Government,
whether or not we like it.
The only question is whether
World Government will be achieved
by conquest or consent.”

Paul Warburg

At the end everybody gets an RFID Chip.
If one is against us, we turn the chip off.

“if there will be one army, then who will they go to war with…”

“They will go to WAR on us, or on anyone who stands agains them!”

by George Orwell

Now forget about all this being conspiracy for we are way past that. I study business and business studies talk of this global movement and are moving towards our one world government. In fact, it is social business now and to get a degree you must do at least 2 social papers.

But let’s look at the control in studies. I did my first social business paper 2nd semester this year through correspondence. My tutor phoned me concerned of my second assignment because I had not contributed on the Internet board and I had not borrowed the books recommended. He said, “I am worried you will fail”. I said, “It is all good, I’ve got it”. And I did have it BTW and passed.

But let me explain how it works. You are told through these papers that YOU have to think for yourself. That your view is critical and you must shown your own value through your work. In this way you are lead to believe that you have come up with the answers yourself. That you have chosen to believe this to be the right way the world should work. That you agree with what is going on. In fact you have no marks for conclusion only for your thinking ability.

But … and this is the catch. You must agree with the theories before you and build on them.

What is happening in study is that a foundation is laid which in many cases including science and biology and disease and medicine and social studies and business can never be questioned. All that anyone living today and in the future can do is fine tune it. The foundations that are laid have been carefully calculated and money has been given to research that goes along with the ideology of where the studies lead.

For instance: It is very probable AIDS did not come from monkeys. In fact, it can be argued that leading pharmaceutical companies actually created the virus through tests on gays in the early 70’s. And please don’t go into this with me for I have already taken this on in the gay community.

Another is the environmental issue of global warming. Is it correct that humans are creating it? Not bloody likely but it suits the agenda and is the truth we will pass on to the following generations. In fact, it is the one thing that will allow a world wide governing body to exist by consensus. And it is the biggest growing world wide movement through studies and the Internet. Another is guns and another is poverty.

You see, from the foundation laid we can only do hypotheses asking whether it is greater or less than. From this we can make new up to date theories. What we can’t do is ask whether something is real or truth.

We are prisoners of a system and we are without knowing it giving our permission to it.

What is the most remarkable thing is where feminism fits into all this. Feminism is always looking to take over the man system that has existed for centuries that uses history and facts. When feminism takes over an area of study through screaming discrimination it changes the existing criteria to the criteria of world domination. The saddest thing is that they don’t even know they are doing it for they think they are a small piece in a man’s world. But the one thing they have not yet come to terms with is that most men have less power than women and always have.

What else women never realised is that the man system was to control man and let women of the hook for we have never once looked at women’s crimes from a woman’s perspective. We never once considered that a woman taking a man to the cleaners for 19 years is a crime yet we consider the man who stole a woman’s purse or man’s wallet with one days wages a crime. Women never once cared that men got greater sentences than women and women never asked for real equality. The only thing that feminism does is destroy what it is paid to destroy from elite leaders in society. And that destruction was never meant to destroy man for the majority of men had nothing to destroy in the first place. Everything men did was for women and children. Their lives were always less important than women.

It was always a system that feminists were to destroy. It was always a longing and need to live off the state power that women fought for. They were always meant to replace men with the state.

And now that we come to terms with a one world government, we need to stop calling people who know what is going on as conspirators. We need to see the trees through the forest for what they really are. There are big players in this and they know full well what they are doing.

Who owns the media? Many say the left and they are correct. But it was the Rothschilds who bought it. They are the communists. BTW, enjoy the site given. It has much to offer in the making of non existing money that all world countries pay interest on.

Who owns the United nations? Well, that’ll be the Rockefellers and they are the capitalists.

Related link: Mens news daily

NZ is far behind America knowing what is going on but when speaking with feminists, they agree and when speaking with Maori, they agree. Why is it so hard for the men’s movement to catch on???

Who were the biggest funders of feminism? The American CIA and the Rockefellers.


  1. This post strays a bit too far into conspiracy-theory territory for my liking, Julie, but you do provide an interesting perspective on the history of American Feminism.

    Please everyone, resist the temptation to debate off-topic issues such as RFID chips, AIDS, global warming, ownership of the media, ownership of United Nations, etc., etc.

    Discussion about Feminism is welcomed.

    Comment by JohnP — Tue 7th October 2008 @ 12:04 pm

  2. John, you are a tough one. lol Thank you for letting my post stand.

    Comment by julie — Tue 7th October 2008 @ 1:12 pm

  3. Julie- You do your own credibility a disservice with these conspiracy theories.
    The problem with them is three-fold:
    1 People are just not capable of the level of organization, co-ordination and secrecy required on this scale.
    2 There are too many other intelligent and ambitious people in the world to allow such a situation to exist without challenge. There is never just one controlling power block without there being at least a large opposing block, plus a bunch of smaller contenders. This is the reality of the world.
    3 World domination, or even local domination requires “Hearts and Minds” or totalitarian style control. In the “Western” countries no group has either.

    Feminism had some justification at the beginning, was hijacked by extremists, and now has become little more than a tired relic, with small, isolated power blocks.
    Fear of feminism as if they were a monolithic, world dominating power block drains your energy, makes you ineffective.

    Ridicule and challenge can be devastatingly effective against what are isolated individuals and small power bases, usually with little public support.

    Comment by John Brett — Tue 7th October 2008 @ 5:33 pm

  4. Mr Brett, I just love your naivety. I can assure you gangsters conspire and have been doing so well before the murder of John F Kennedy.

    Hitler said, “We don’t care what you think for we have your children”. And don’t forget Germany opened the Frankfurt School where they devised “Critical Theory”.

    “It is perfectly possible for a man to be out of prison, and yet not free -to be under no physical constraint and yet to be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national state, or of some private interest within the nation, wants him to think, feel and act.
    Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley, 1958
    The bankers made a manifesto

    We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance.

    Organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.

    At the coming Omaha convention to be held July 4, 1892, our men must attend and direct its movement or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome.

    This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation.

    The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through the process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers.

    People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

    History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

    The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

    By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete actions, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished.

    Comment by julie — Tue 7th October 2008 @ 6:36 pm

  5. I am amazed John that you know Barbara and yet you can’t accept that people in groups conspire.

    “The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective.”
    Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley, 1958

    And just for a bit of fun … the Bilderberg group actually exists and has for a long time even though hardly anyone will dare write an article in a newspaper about them. Strange that! lol

    Is Bilderberg a secret conspiracy?

    When such rich and powerful people meet up in secret, with military intelligence managing their security, with hardly a whisper escaping of what goes on inside, people are right to be suspicious. But the true power of Bilderberg comes from the fact that participants are in a bubble, sealed off from reality and the devastating implications on the ground of the black-science economic solutions on the table.

    No, it’s not a ‘conspiracy’. The world’s leading financiers and foreign policy strategists don’t get together at Bilderberg to draw up their ‘secret plans for the future’. It’s subtler than that. These meetings create an artificial ‘consensus’ in an attempt to spellbind visiting politicians and other men of influence. Blair has fallen for this hook, line and sinker. It’s about reinforcing – often to the very people who are on the edge of condemning Globalisation – the illusion that Globalisation is ‘good’, ‘popular’ and that it’s inevitable.

    Bilderberg is an extremely influential lobbying group. That’s not to say though that the organisers don’t have a hidden agenda, they do, namely acumulation of wealth and power into their own hands whilst explaining to the participants that globalisation is for the good of all. It is also a very good forum for ‘interviewing’ potential future political figures such as Clinton (1991) and Blair (1993). [see above for more on this]

    The ideology put forward at the Bilderberg conferences is that what’s good for banking and big business is good for the mere mortals of the world. Silently banished are the critical voices, those that might point out that debt is spiralling out of control, that wealth is being sucked away from ordinary people and into the hands of the faceless corporate institutions, that millions are dying as a direct result of the global heavyweight Rockefeller/Rothschild economic strategies.

    BTW, you yourself plan as you reach for your goals in life.

    Comment by julie — Tue 7th October 2008 @ 6:37 pm

  6. I think its the alien mind control that the Rockerfellers used that is the real threat. 🙂

    Julie, its good entertainment.


    Comment by Scrap_The_CSA — Tue 7th October 2008 @ 7:12 pm

  7. Thanx Scrap. And I agree. (or is it the other way around)lol

    Comment by julie — Tue 7th October 2008 @ 7:17 pm

  8. Julie
    Keep posting- so that if you suddenly disappear it will be noticed.

    Comment by John Brett — Wed 8th October 2008 @ 8:43 am

  9. Julie- I have not said that I don’t believe in conspiracies- What I said is that there are MANY competing conspiracies and world domination plans.
    Belief in one UBER-conspiracy lacks credibility, because history shows that
    1 ambitious people are just incapable of the co-operation required,
    2 Secrecy on such a scale is just not possible.
    (Just research the Yalta conference if you don’t believe me- Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt met to agree on the carve-up of the world after Hitler was defeated- the resulting disagreements are what we called the ‘Cold War”)

    What you get is competing forces, which can be interesting, until they paste up the recruiting posters!
    The opportunities are there for the clever, to set one against another, to benefit another cause.
    (e.g. The Russian Communists successfully set the Trade Unions against the Management to cripple the economies of western countries).

    So don’t talk about ONE BIG conspiracy- look for several, and look for the opportunities this creates.
    Your mate Bob Harvey looks like he could be seriously embarrassed by this sort of tactic!




    Comment by John Brett — Wed 8th October 2008 @ 3:16 pm

  10. John, I wrote a good comment to back things that are more related to NZ and Aussie but thought that was way of topic.

    Everything is global now. Feminism has been global for decades.

    What they plan and indoctrinate and implement is all in their books.

    But I understand your children are into conspiracy. To be honest I didn’t know I was until this year when I put things forward. I didn’t know what most knew to be real was considered conspiracy.

    Comment by julie — Wed 8th October 2008 @ 7:14 pm

  11. My thoughts are that people see this world as nice and innocent. In what time frame in history has there not been a group of people that have been able to agree on an agenda and work together to achieve it. Lets take an example close to home, The Destiny Church movement consist of around 7000 people who all have one main goal and look at what they have been able to do in 10 years. I say good on them. So I don’t understand how people can think that it is not possible for a group of people to sit behind closed doors and work a way to create a One World Government. It only takes a small had full to agree on something to start making changes. One World Government is real and alive and I don’t like it.

    Comment by Daniel — Wed 5th November 2008 @ 10:39 am

  12. So how far has anyone ever got with creating One World Government?
    How likely is it to ever make any progress do you think?
    How high should it be on the list of things to worry about?

    Comment by John Brett — Wed 5th November 2008 @ 5:05 pm

  13. They progress yearly in their goals. I saw about one month ago an add for one of the newer small political parts and it stated that one of their goals was to have one united government for all nations. They asked for votes and this is on our back door step. They have made most of their progress in the last 20-25 years. There are books on it but I don’t watch it with fear, I’m just aware of them.

    I expect them to be in power within the next 20 years max. My own theory with no grounds to it, is that the big door will open with the assassination of Obama. I only hope I’m wrong as he has the potential to do some good in this world.

    And I also would never lose sleep over it as it is something that in my opinion cannot be stopped. Worrying never changed anything.

    Comment by Daniel — Wed 5th November 2008 @ 11:03 pm

  14. On the original topic of feminism, I am over being looked down at by woman who think they are bigger and better than I just because I am a male. Where in reality there isn’t and shouldn’t be any difference. How ever I also understand that not all woman are like this. But some how there is a general teaching that is being inbuilt in to woman that at the end of the day they are always right. I’m of the opinion that every one should be listened to equally but not to those who have the attitude that they are right and nothing you say can change there opinion. I also just got told by my flat mate that me views are sexist. How ever I have the up most respect for woman that can respect others.

    Comment by Daniel — Wed 5th November 2008 @ 11:36 pm

  15. Good on you Daniel. I could go on about this one world government but it is considered conspiracy from the rightwing and libertarians.

    Anyhow, yeap, people do plan in generations. My grandfather is my children’s great grandfather (you know it) and they will continue his dream as will all the other great grandchildren and their children will do the same.

    4 generations my grandfather has affected and counting. I can’t understand sometimes why men have forgotten how once a blacksmith had a son, he would be a blacksmith and his son and his son and his son and so on.

    Comment by julie — Thu 6th November 2008 @ 11:26 pm

  16. Thank you Julie. You have condemned me as a “Libertarian” and as “Right Wing” for just being a thinking human being, and for “forgetting” that my father was a sheet metal worker, his father was also, and back as far as the old family Bible allows me.

    “One World Government”, “One world order”- my prediction is that it will be as successfull as previous attempts- starting with the Greek Alexander, Julius Cesear, Napoleon, Attilla, Hitler, Stalin, and a few others (not to forget the Catholic Church). Current contender is the “(dis)united nations” which is attempting to coerce the world to follow it’s dictates. UN has the disadvantage of being PASSIONLESS and transparently corrupt.

    Note that I am refraining from calling you a brainwashed, left wing clone, however if you went to School or University in NZ it’s probably not your fault.

    I predict with confidence- More disharmony, more wars, more diverging and converging streams of power and influence- ad infinitum, until the cockroaches inherit the earth.

    Regards John ;-}

    Comment by John Brett — Fri 7th November 2008 @ 12:41 pm

  17. Sorry John if I offended about the rightwing and libertarian. I just find the left wing to write about the war on terror also know as the information war.

    I think you make a good point about history and our situation where nothing really changes.

    Comment by julie — Fri 7th November 2008 @ 4:01 pm

  18. I’m happy I wrote things on menz because I can come back and collect information – almost like having a private library.

    It’s timely now that single parents are being forced to work – interesting how ‘from a child turning 1‘ has entered the discussion when no-one from New Zealand put it forward. (behind the scenes they sure did but it’s a global plan – tested and working in Sweden).

    Now, what else will I find. 😉

    Comment by julie — Sat 27th November 2010 @ 11:59 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar