Judge treats rapist with leniency
In Hamilton a 45 year old has been convicted of sexual conduct with a person under 16. The inebriated 45 year old undressed the protesting child and had sex with them. Although the sex was non-consensual the charge of sexual violation wasn’t laid. The offender was sentenced to 22 months imprisonment converted to 11 months home detention. Also the offender was convicted of assaulting their 14 year old daughter after grabbing the girl by the throat and throwing her to the floor.
Why such leniency? The offender is a woman and the victim is male.
home detention in a retirement village..amazing..if i ever appear in court for anything i hope i get a similar sentence to what women get..what a joke
Why such leniency? Because the “shock horror” brigade are composed entirely of one eyed, hysterical feminists. Female victim? nope; male perpetrator? nope; then no fuss necessary. Welcome to NZ; where human rights and justice are only bestowed upon that privileged group that sport mammary glands and a vagina. In the popular vernacular – you just have to “man up” and live with it!
‘the heavy set woman’..no wonder the poor kid is traumatised..scare the shit out of anyone
Reply to nickcoop and Ford
That sentence is so disgusting…
Another classic case of a ‘pussy pass’ for a Kiwi women,in the feminist state of N.Z….
If a ‘Kiwi Man’ would done exactly the same crime as this kiwi woman did …
He would have received a sentence of prison,for a term of between 4 years to 7 years at least…..Grrrrrrr…My blood is boiling…!!!!!
Come on you western European women Kiwi Gestapo feminists…Justify this type of sentence that you as Feminists define as ‘Equality’
Kind regards…… John Dutchie…Free at long last
i tried to post a link yesterday but it didnt work for some reason but a woman in america spread rumours she was dying of cancer and wanted to get married and have a honeymoon before she died..well people evidently donated 1000’s and the bridal company donated her dress etc..she got a free honeymoon in some exotic place and when the truth came out her hubby divorced her and she spent less than 3 months in prison
less than 2 moths i meant
Reply to Ford
Ford you know that website I use to belong too.????..Guess what I rejoined and I posting how amazing Asian women are…And the ‘flak’ I getting from Kiwi women is damn awesome….L.O.L….
Kind regards”¦”¦ John Dutchie”¦Free at long last
this 45 yr old sexual feind might be 1 of them john..lol
Reply to Ford#8
…L.O.L…My Asian lady partner is on the floor laughing her head off on that statement you have just made there Ford …Plus she is so ‘gob smacked’ on how Kiwi women don’t like Asian women..I did warn her …
As I said to her…The real reason is so… ‘Kiwi women feel so threaten by the wonderful and strong femininity of Asian women’
Kind regards”¦”¦ John Dutchie”¦Free at long last
Anyone read a book called The Second Sexism – discrimination against men and boys, by David Benetar? I haven’t; that is why I am asking and is it any good?
Hi Down Under check my last post – stuff just published a ‘review’ of it by some feminist fruitcake – get in quick if you want to join the fun and comment on her thoughts, or what passes for thought in femville.
#11..read this about the poor hard done by feminist crybabies
Ã¢â‚¬ËœReview’ she was so busy blabbering on about her own opinion she forgot to review the book – that’s what you get from feminist media these days. Was hoping someone who had read it might have a constructive opinion.
If you want to understand what’s going here, read the following written by Lord Chesterfield to his son over 250 years ago. Nothing has changed with regard to the sexes in all that time, other than that the “women’s sphere” – ie that space where men must watch what they say because there may not be masculine sense predominating – has greatly expanded:
The bottom line
He agreed to convict the pair and discharge them without further penalty as long as they made a donation of $200 to the city’s Maori Women’s Refuge over the next three weeks.
And Stephen, the first five Bachop, made a donation of $500 to Women’s refuge as well. Our courts should be part of the charities commission.
#15..16..everytime the courts make an order to a charity its always a womens charity..ive never seen an order made to a mens group
#16 Imagine if he’d been found not guilty ? Would Women’s Refuge have been ordered by the Court to give the money back ? hahaha, yeah right !
I am surprised that the person was even charged – there guys weren’t:
Steve (#19); thanks for posting this. As we all know; CYFS are above the law. They can do as they please to wreck havoc and administer unimaginable distress and evil into the lives of seemingly responsible, well adjusted families.
No news here; just a continuation of the litany of lawlessness we’ve come to expect from these creeps. You have to wonder what “hold” CYFS have over certain political figures that allows them to charge on in the relentless pursuit of family destruction and yet never be held to account. Are we to infer from this latest side show, that CYFS might indeed be involved in the pimping of kids for certain public figures at the tax payers expense? Surely not!
#20..perhaps the hold they have is “Feminist Attack”?
Steve (#19): I have just been reading the account told by the parents of this child. While nothing would surprise me in the secret courts of NZ, and I have no doubt that CYFS and many other NZ agencies have been captured by anti-family and father-blaming philosophies and a confused type of femaleism, I note that the information I have come across has all emanated from the aggrieved parents who use pejorative, extreme language in describing events. Apart from what those parents have reported, I have no understanding of the reasoning of the many authorities whom the parents accuse of corruption, conspiracy and cover-up. It seems unlikely that so many individuals and representatives of various organisations would have adopted similar critical attitudes towards those parents if there were not some basis for this. Nevertheless, if organisations have behaved unethically, dishonestly or inconsistently with their duties then they should be held accountable.
Hi Hans, I would invite you to listen to the Leighton Smith & Danny Watson shows on Newstalk ZB archives at the above link, and / or contact the parents at [email protected]
I am now on very, very public record as saying that everything the parents have said, and the way they have said it, is true, and can be evidentially proved as true, evidence which includes affidavits of response from the daughter.
This case has all the hallmarks of qualifying for a Royal Commission of Enquiry into corrupt Social Service and Legal practice, and goes the very highest levels of Government.
The parents were simply holding reasonable boundaries with thier child, and seeking redress for a crime – and the State deeply resented them for doing both.
#23..just because someone says its true its not necessarliy true is it?..and as far as affa davits are concerned..they not worth the paper they are written on..especially by a minor and a female at that..and no doubt coached through that process
#23 Steve, I was listening to the interview live on the radio (I’ve since downloaded it for posterity !) and I loved the Father’s last comments. He said something to the effect, “The New Zealand Authorities have 2 options. Either I’m telling the truth, in which case something should be done about these things, or I’m not telling the truth, in which case something should be done about me !”
Ford: Then as Leighton Smith said after I was interviewed, one has to decide who they are going to trust, and whose story they are going to believe – kind of what Golfa has pointed out.
#27..and an unfortunate reality is most people wish to beleive a bunch of lies
Ford: Which is why it took us 7 years to get this story into the mainstream media – it was our word against the State – I am still almost incredulous that we were able to finally be believed.