MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Law Commission Panders to War Against Men

Filed under: Gender Politics,General,Law & Courts,Sex Abuse / CYF — Ministry of Men's Affairs @ 11:19 am Fri 5th April 2013

MoMA MEDIA RELEASE:

Law Commission Panders to War Against Men

Community group the Ministry of Men’s Affairs today expressed concern that the latest changes recommended by the NZ Law Commission in sexual offence cases will further reduce the ability of defendants, mainly men, to protect themselves against false sexual allegations.

As part of a review of the Evidence Act, the Commission recommended that any discussion of sexual history should be dealt with before trial and that complainants be notified in advance what the defence intended to cross-examine them about.

Ministry of Men’s Affairs spokesman Kerry Bevin said the recommendations were the latest in a long line of changes specific to sexual accusations. He said “There is little reason to treat sexual allegations differently from any other allegations. They need to be subjected to the same scrutiny to ensure they are true and people accused need to have same protections against false conviction.”

“We believe most of the changes that have occurred in recent decades for sexual trials have had the effect of making it easier to convict men on the basis of inadequate evidence, often no more than “she-said’ evidence.”

“The law changes have essentially sought to make it easier for women to have men convicted.”

“If these constant reductions in the ability of defendants in sexual cases to defend themselves were justified they should be applied to all other criminal cases but they are not. We believe this is because women are significantly accused of most other crimes and it would be seen as unfair to reduce their ability to properly defend themselves. But fairness towards men seems to be seen as less important.”

Mr Bevin said that the Law Commission’s recommendations were based on an emphasis on what it called “the ghastly, stressful experience” for complainants in sex trials, but this was true in most other criminal cases too and the same applied for those accused. “Accused men are staring into the barrel of huge, life-ruining prison terms. When allegations are false or exaggerated the defendant’s experience will be extremely traumatic and this has increased with each successive removal of protections against false conviction for sexual crimes.”
End

MINISTRY OF MEN’S AFFAIRS
MINITATANGA MO NGA TANE
A Community Group because successive governments have failed to protect the welfare of New Zealand men

PO Box 13130
Tauranga 3141
mmainnz@gmail.com

Contact: Hans Laven (07)5712435 or (0274)799745
or Kerry Bevin (09)4247762

4 Responses to “Law Commission Panders to War Against Men”

  1. Hans Laven says:

    Oh by the way, the Herald article related to this was “Spare victims in-court wrangle over sexual history, review urges”

    We have written to the journalist Isaac Davison urging him to stop referring to female complainants as ‘victims’ before a proper Court process has determined that any offence occurred and that a complainant was indeed a victim of any such offence. We would encourage others here to write to the journalist similarly. Fat chance.

  2. Gwahir says:

    I believe it should be equal. If either party wishes to expose the others personal history then they also Must stand to be interrogated on theirs.

    In the operation Austin cases had this been in effect I believe we could well have led to different (But not necessarily correct) verdicts

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar