How shallow are females on tinder?
In response to this article in the Herald I ran my own study. In my first post I added my close up photo and simply said I was looking to form a relationship with a woman to share the good things in life and to love and cherish her. I added that I had lost my home, my job and my children after my previous marriage failed. I then swiped right on the profiles of a hundred women, indicating that I was ‘interested’. After five hours i had received 16 matches from potential dates.
I then replaced my photo with one of me sitting in my lamborghini aventador wearing my Cartier watch and a fist full of $$$$$. After again swiping right on a hundred women, this time my profile attracted 75 matches in the five hour time frame – a 250 per cent increase on my previous post.
The Herald is right….there really are narcissistic people out there that go to these particular sites to satisfy their appetite, but they are a minority of folk and come from both genders…….that is what the Herald is saying, isn’t it?…surely!!
Amazing how the news media even allows these blatantly sexually bigoted articles to be published. If they had included your example of how female sexual choices are made, not on the character of the male, but his financial status, then this article could resemble something that has balance to it. Both behaviours are well known and established in research. There is no news in this article.
However as a result of feminists living in a world of irrational beliefs, it has been left to entities such as Myth Busters to prove just how shallow and disrespectful of men, women really are. They did a similar test and showed clearly that females judge, and are attracted to males based on wealth.
It’s no surprise that males judge sexual attractiveness of females based on looks. That is why we say she’s a 10, or when looking at the average feminist, she’s a 3.
Women hate being judged for anything. The fact that this article revolves around labelling males as shallow men, is really concerning. Why? Because the article revolves around how females can manipulate the reactions of men based on how well a female deceives the man. But it’s the man’s fault that he responded predictably, to the act of deception.
In your example of deceiving women, the result was equally predictable. However you will be labelled the offender, because you were deceiving the women.
Can you imagine how outraged a female would be if the following happened.
A male is on this Tinder website and grossly fabricates information and perceptions of his wealth. A female sexual predator is searching for a victim for the act of pregnancy without consent. She wants a wealthy male to provide large sums in child support so she can raise her child. She manipulates the sexual encounter with the male so that she becomes pregnant. The male is left scratching his head going ‘how the hell did that happen?’. 9 months later she gets her first CS payment from her victim, only to discover her evil plan has backfired, he has nothing.
Comment by DJ Ward — Wed 19th August 2015 @ 12:18 pm
We recall dating-site research (but can’t find the study) in which a photograph of a man standing next to an expensive car received many times more replies from females than exactly the same shot of the man but depicted as standing next to a cheap car. So which gender is shallow? This research showed much the same thing but in a more complex study.
And here’s a women’s opinion calling for dating sites to make it compulsory for men to specify their income so that women can make better-informed choices about whom to communicate with.
And there has been a range of research (for example, this study) all confirming the shallow tendency of women to go for more wealthy men.
We agree with DJ Ward’s criticism of the extent to which media continue to jump on the bandwagon of misandry, when they wouldn’t dare publish similar articles disparaging women.
Comment by Ministry of Men's Affairs — Thu 20th August 2015 @ 9:21 am
Very unscientific.Men are just as shallow on average as women in my experience.
Comment by Tracey — Sun 23rd August 2015 @ 8:26 pm
#3
That’s what we have been saying Tracey. It has negative male behaviours and negative female behaviours. The feminist media on the other hand virtually always expresses the issue as one with a male offender, and ignores the female offenders.
The article that started this thread is a good example of this bigotry.
Comment by DJ Ward — Mon 24th August 2015 @ 9:10 am
I would go a bit further than Tracey. In my observation, men contribute more shallowness, than their fair share. I like to think that they also contribute many other more positive things too, but unfortunately shallowness shows up too much from both sides of the equation.
For all of the important decisions, it is the individual case that matters. That should be decided on its own merits and the facts of the case.
If it ever seems that the average statistic is an issue, then you know that the proper facts of the individual case are not to hand, aren’t being properly considered, the decider is refusing to face the individual facts of the case….. I had all of these feelings when I attempted to deal in good faith with the clowns/thieves in the familycaught$.
Incompetent at issues to deal with children’s or adults welfare or protection, too competent at seeing other people’s money and assets that they might be able to take….
All generalisations are wrong? Over the years I did notice that most NZ women had higher financial expectations, than overseas born women. Also, that most separated fathers seemed to end up with overseas born ladyfriends, whether they liked it or not.
Also noticed that NZ women didn’t have a very sharp eye for checking out men’s finances, from any lies told. It appeared to me, that the most greedy women often ended up not getting the wealthiest men, despite their good looks. Trying to be very smart seemed to work backwards for them?
In any case, in my opinion the most satisfied people enjoy what they have, rather than the richest people. Maybe mental health and health are worth more than asset wealth? I am taking as many tablets as I can get my hands on, to desperately try to improve my mental health……and happiness. (Real life is a crutch for people who can’t handle drugs.)
Comment by MurrayBacon — Mon 24th August 2015 @ 9:12 am
Yes, women don’t care what a man looks like, it just the size of his wallet that counts.
“The only thing is, except for some generic photos of couples, and an arty picture of the back of a chap in an art gallery, there are no photos of the man himself.”
That’s right, looks mean nothing.
Oh the irony of the reporter.
“But most women, he finds, just want to get their French manicured fingers on his wallet, she tells me.”
‘The minute women know who he is, they see dollar signs,’ she says.
No surprise why she is single.
‘Do you trust men?’ she asks.
‘Erm, no. I always seem to get let down by them,’ I reply.
Imagine how the poor males felt!
This sounds like something that should be added to all White Ribbon adds.
“I need to start trusting them and, as I’ve been told before, she reckons I could be creating a self-fulfilling prophecy for myself.”
“she’s had 1400 applications”
WOW, how many would he receive if he said,”I manage financially”?
This guy needs a rock solid pre-nuptial.
My advice to this male is to create children using surrogacy. That way he can have children and he will avoid being asset striped by a female targeting matrimonial property. You can see the judge ruling on it now. She applied for the job of partner with the hope of finding love, he on the other hand was using you as a sex slave, and incubator. Here is your compensation for your suffering.
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/relationships/single-in-sydney-sarah-sends-off-an-application-to-date-a-real-life-american-prince-charming/story-fnet0gly-1227532100366
Comment by DJ Ward — Fri 18th September 2015 @ 9:13 am
#6: Stylized prostitution.
Comment by Man X Norton — Sat 19th September 2015 @ 9:39 am