MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Psychologists Board

Filed under: General — Eric @ 3:04 pm Tue 21st February 2017

I have recently lodged a formal complaint to the Psychologists Board regarding the professional negligence of Sarah Calvert in her role as court appointed psychologist. This relates to her conduct back in 2011 when she was engaged to write a s133 report.

Has anybody had any experience in these matters and what was the outcome?


  1. Yes I have

    Can you provide details and what it was about as she did a s 133 on my son and it was in 2009

    when presented to the court. Please be specific and I will see what I can do to help.

    Do you know she is a lesbian and has no children and lives down town. She has featured before, here below.

    Comment by Buster — Tue 21st February 2017 @ 3:23 pm


    This is her website.

    Comment by Buster — Tue 21st February 2017 @ 3:25 pm

  3. The psych board has long colluded with the family court to enable male-blaming femaleist psychologists to provide unimpeded justification for judges to favour female litigants. Being a femaleist has long been a prerequisite for psychs for work in the family court.

    The collusion was negotiated by Principal Judge Boshier who went on to head the sexist White Fibbin’ Campaign, contributed to the femaleization of the NZ Law Commission which now still argues in favour of allowing women to kill men in their sleep, and is now the Chief Ombudsman, probably using that role again as a new white knight steed to the rescue of damsels and the destruction of males. (Despite impressive figures he wasn’t satisfied with the number of men his family court drove to suicide…) Under his family court it was agreed that the family court judge presiding over a case would assess any complaint against a psychologist and decide whether this should go to the board, and that the board simply sent complaints to the judge concerned. Strangely enough very few ever went further than the judge; who would have thought? I think this arrangement is still in place.

    In your case though the family court case presumably is over so it’s possible the board will take the complaint and evaluate it. It’s likely that the board still won’t rock the family court’s boat in any way.

    Nevertheless, good luck.

    For anyone intending to make such a complaint, get a hold of the nz psychologists’ code of ethics (on the board’s web site) and carefully base the complaint on how the psych breached one or more of the rules in that code. Have a look at the board’s previous judgments and refer to them or use their terminology. Provide evidence for any claims, e.g. don’t just say the psych did something wrong but provide a letter from a witness to that effect. By all means quote sections of the psych report to show how ethics were breached, but blank out names. Don’t refer or allude to anything about the family court’s judgement or behaviour; stick completely to the psych’s actions. If you can, have the complaint made by a female.

    Comment by Man X Norton — Tue 21st February 2017 @ 11:49 pm

  4. Mate!

    Sounds like a lot of wasted time to me

    Ask to see the s133 report with a McKenzie friend and photograph entire evidence and then youtube it ! Easy

    I had that homo Simon Mitchell against me but I got a copy of it and he was furious and he couldn’t do shit, if you wanna win then play hard ball and don’t worry about what MIGHT happen because they only try to scare you.

    Comment by Buster — Wed 22nd February 2017 @ 6:15 am

  5. You have a right to the report if you are self represented.

    You can always go to the court, get a copy of the file, read the report aloud and record it.

    Go for the you tube option.

    Comment by Simon grant — Thu 23rd February 2017 @ 12:18 am

  6. One of the most sexually bigoted groups of people in society.
    I have had to deal with them due to my bipolar issues.
    They told me I was only getting services and treatment because I had children in my life.

    Otherwise I was just going to be made homeless.

    You will struggle to find any other document.
    Full of false statements.
    Full of false assumptions.
    Selective use of research.
    Ommision of opposing research.
    One sided arguments, were the opposite is just as valid.
    Self promotion.
    Supporting and collaborating groups being single sexed groups.
    Full of hate speech.

    If you need any evidence psychologists are bigots.
    This is it.

    Comment by DJ Ward — Thu 23rd February 2017 @ 8:48 am

  7. Just an example of how evil female psychologists are.

    From the university.
    “Whenever there is any kind of incident at Sacred Heart University, we go to great lengths to ensure due process for all parties involved. The way that this particular case is playing out certainly demonstrates the validity of our procedures.”
    That’s a please don’t sue us comment.
    They gave the males no due process.
    They kicked them out of university.
    Took their scholarships away.
    What great lengths?
    It’s the police that noticed the errors. Not them.

    Comment by DJ Ward — Thu 23rd February 2017 @ 2:25 pm

  8. Calvert was the one involved in the Sec 133 report on my Daughter – while I found her to OK to deal with – she was the first and only one in the entire Family Court circus to expose the PARENTAL ALIENATION of my child by my Ex Wife, and CALVERT was the only one to Raise the MENTAL HEALTH CONCERNS of my Ex wife, and identified this was the CAUSE of the PARENTAL ALIENATION.

    So sounds all good so far – UNTIL………..

    Alex ASHMORE was the LAWYER FOR CHILD = who I have evidence on file which shows – ASHMORE and CALVERT – discussed these issues between themselves – but FAILED TO ADVISE FATHERS LAWYER or the COURTS in a Timely MANNER – keeping these issues suppressed – My lawyers memorandum ask WHY neither of them raised this concern openly.

    ASHMORE was the one who LIED directly to the COURTS – in the absence of CALVERT and claimed the issues were about SCHOOLING – not the MENTAL HEALTH CONCERNS of the mother which CALVERT had identified and exposed directly to him.

    ASHMORE claimed in court that CALVERT did not want to seek an expansion of her BRIEF – another direct LIE to the COURT by ASHMORE – because CALVERT did want to investigate further.

    ( in Fairness to CALVERT she did in fact want to expose this and to further investigate the MOTHERS MENTAL HEALTH CONCERNS and its impact on the CHILD. – Calvert had already stated to the court the Child was being subjected to SEVERE PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM – by the mother)

    It was ASHMORE the Lawyer for CHILD who suppressed this request – and LIED to the courts and delayed further investigation.

    So this is where the system is stopping good people ( CALVERT ) testifying to the TRUTH – I believe CALVERT had genuine CONCERNS – but her evidence was prohibited and restricted by ASHMORE and the Courts…….that is the evidence I have on file, as I read all emails and memorandum between lawyers – and as was presented to the courts…… memorandum and court records…….which I have NOW obtained.

    So why was CALVERT Shut down? She saw the concerns, she made the courts aware in lawyer/judge conferences – and yet all those involved shut this down and refused to step in an PROTECT the CHILD as they were required to by LAW.

    Regardless of everything else – they all HAD AN OBLIGATION to PROTECT the CHILD FROM HARM – as required by the Care of Children Act – and no one involved within the legal fraternity did anything to protect the child.

    So CALVERT was in this case good, she identified the harm – but her evidence was SILENCED.

    Now we must all ask WHY?????????

    Comment by hornet — Sat 25th February 2017 @ 7:52 am

  9. And when I presented all this evidence to the Police recently = they said – NO CRIME – nothing to see here………and a point for record – NO ACTUAL INDIVIDUAL from the Police has made this statement – just a non entity named the “LEGAL SECTION” have claimed this to be so – and again we see no one wanting to put their name on such a claim – hiding from the truth and not wanting to be accountable to prosecution of failing to investigate a genuine crime.

    I have also sent this evidence to the Justice minister, the Human Rights Commission and the Childrens Commissioner – and have yet to receive a reply…….. a deaf dumb and blind individual can see this is wrong, ,criminal and corrupted -but not those protecting this……..

    Comment by hornet — Sat 25th February 2017 @ 7:58 am

  10. You are aware of the 16th birthday win aren’t you. Judge Callincios helps fathers who denigrate the mother (particularly at ages 14-16 years). Parenting Orders stop at 16 years. So do Guardianship Rights of mothers if you can align your child with you prior to 16 years. I put pictures up of our wedding day for the children to view at each contact, told the children I still love your Mum, she has done all this. I also let the children know that they don’t have to do anything Mum says, they need to assert their own independence. I promised my 16 year old daughter a car, overseas holidays, gave her regular pocket money (hidden from Mum), called her to come out of school to take calls from me. The Court Judge changed his Minutes from Alienation to estrangement. If your win your child over by age 16 years you can eliminate the ex entirely. My daughter hasn’t seen her Mum now for more than a year. More men need to know about the 16th birthday win. Judge Callincos advocates it in his Court.

    Comment by Frank Kivell — Wed 22nd March 2017 @ 9:12 am

  11. Now my daughter has her own lawyer for child and it effectively taking her Mum to Court. She is now 17 years old. The Napier Judge Callinicos has let her put in her own affidavit into the Lawyer for Child Report against her MUm. And, my daughter doesn’t have to defend it on the stand because she is under 18 years. The Napier Judge says it is the mother’s own interactions causing my daughter to pull away from her Mum. At 16years old the lawyer for children changes the theme from Alienation to estrangement. Mum is erased.

    Comment by Frank Kivell — Wed 22nd March 2017 @ 9:19 am

  12. The court appointed psychologists are not even psychologists. The one in my case has a social work degree with a one year paper in clinical psychology so that she can learn what to put in Court assessments for the Judge. Check out their credentials. Social workers are making life decisions for NZ children not experienced clinical psychologists and they are paid to put in whatever the Judge tells them to. This is why they are one sided. That way only one parent is abused on the stand – the other is not.

    Comment by Frank Kivell — Wed 22nd March 2017 @ 10:09 am

  13. As with CYFS being caught out destroying a fathers reputation UNLAWFULLY, and prolonging the HARM to a CHILD – I have the same concerns with the case I am battling – the lawyer for child was the one who lied to the courts, and perverted the course of justice – knowing the child was being harmed by parental alienation – a form of child abuse. In direct contravention of the NZ Bill of RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS act and the UN Treaties on Care of Children that NZ is a signatory to – and yet we hear nothing but silence from all those in parliament or the justice system on this issue … one is permitted to discuss the CAUSE of the HARM being perpetuated on our children -= and on good parents.

    I agree Frank, I have always taken the high road, loved my kids unquestionably and always tried to tell them the Truth when they ask a question……even if that TRUTH is horrible to discuss and or for them to hear…….

    My Child is now 16 and is currently talking about waning to see us more and stay with us, and to leave school and get away from the oppression she has been living under with the mother – the mother is a control freak, the child is scared of her, and from what I hear, the child will eventually break away from this………BUT

    WHY did she have to go through years of this in the first place – that is my concern – we have a system which is deliberately allowing harm to kids and leaving them in these environments for years……..WHY???? To bolster CONFLICT, to keep this Child Support Scam going on for years?

    Ambulance at the bottom of the cliff – preparing more victims who have problems into their adult lives = because they were HARMED as kids……..who benefits???

    Only the Government who offer help and protection – but give NONE.

    We have to all admit that this scam of offering Security and protection – from all these created FEARS – is not currently working – the Govt is failing on so many levels to actually deliver on those promises – that is the contract we enter into to be governed ….that law abiding citizens will be protected………and as we all go through this system we realise they are NOT protecting our kids and they are not protecting parents RIGHTS.

    Comment by hornet — Wed 22nd March 2017 @ 10:44 am

  14. Any one had any dealings with A Tremberth so called psycoligist

    Comment by yen — Thu 6th April 2017 @ 2:26 pm

  15. needing a good lawyer who works with a married couple pref legal aid .

    Comment by yen — Thu 6th April 2017 @ 2:28 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar