Today’s Lesson on Equality
A Feminist instructer was dutifully educating a small group of eager students in a lesson in equality.
Among the 10 aspiring students, who sought the ultimate prize, the Borg Award for collective understanding, was a young man keen to understand the requirements of the Feminist Master.
Beside them, was a small bridge over a deep dark abyss.
Now, students, please pay attention and watch me closely … and the instructor proceeded to gracefully cross the bridge and return to the class.
Now, James, would you take your turn and do the same please.
James, confident in his endeavors strode forth to cross the bridge, but at the centre point of the arch, the bridge gave way, and James fell into the deep dark hole. A small thud echoed up, but nothing more was heard of James.
The instructor smiled, and raising her eyebrows in quiet jubilation announced, “And, that girls, is today’s lesson in equality”.
I think this guy crossed the bridge OK.
“Brad Kul started charging female customers less than men a few months ago, in an act of solidarity to show them sexism and the gender pay gap is “stupid”.”
So to show sexism is stupid he uses sexism to show how stupid it is?
So is the gender pay gap “stupid” too?
The definition is provided.
“The gender pay gap is an indicator of the difference between women’s and men’s earnings and compares the median hourly earnings of women and men in full- and part-time work.”
We know the reasons for this and it’s females choices vs male choices as much as anything else.
So why should women get a discount because of bad choices like choosing to be on the DPB rather than get educated and/or have a career! Only to find they can only get low paid work later in life?
Why should a women that made good choices get a discount?
Why should a women get a discount if she is using her husbands money to pay for the job?
Is it only single women who get a discount?
Is rich never worked women who’s husbands slaved away to provide for them but died early due to hard work going to get a discount?
Are women who got the free solo mums tertiary education going to get a discount?
Are women who got 50%plus divorce settlements with spousal support going to get a discount?
Are males in those same low paid female professions going to get a discount?
The irony here is this guy got of his arse did an aprentiship, started his own business and probably earns really good money for his work.
Notice they have blacked out his hourly rate.
That would be really imbarasing wouldn’t it.
He is the pay gap problem.
Sorry I mean earnings gap problem.
Most kindy teachers will be going
You charge how much an hour!!!
Damn I made the wrong career choice.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/96329183/auckland-tradie-tackles-gender-pay-gap-by-giving-female-customers-12-per-cent-discount
Comment by DJ Ward — Wed 30th August 2017 @ 9:52 pm
Today’s lesson on Equality.
From our favourite man hater
Clementine ford.
So what’s the lesson.
Don’t preach equality to children then be a bigot.
What was she scared of?
The questions exposing her bullshit.
It was so bad the girls walked out.
The video doesn’t even address the issue of her not letting boys ask questions.
Just more anti male rubbish.
Whoever put this together managed to find the most unflattering photos.
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/wtf/feminist-clementine-ford-sparks-walkout-by-refusing-to-answer-schoolboys-questions/news-story/281fd397dbef086806910390e5dae120
Comment by DJ Ward — Thu 31st August 2017 @ 9:28 pm
Today’s lesson on equality.
I don’t know how to explain this.
Better if you just read it.
http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/media/not-everything-is-about-samesex-marriage-fathers-day-ad-deemed-too-political-for-tv/news-story/08f5f7bea0357def1bea39858fe70dbd
If you think that’s bad, wait to you read this.
“Australian academic Red Ruby Scarlet, convenor of the Social Justice in Early Childhood Activist Group, told todaytonight’s host that scrapping Father’s Day in favour of a non-specific ‘Special Person’s Day’ was not political correctness, but about “rights”.”
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/08/31/early-child-activist-pushes-fathers-day-special-persons-day/
Comment by DJ Ward — Sat 2nd September 2017 @ 3:46 pm
Cheers DJ Ward for your links.
Regarding the Dads 4 Kids Fathers Day video that was censored by the television stations, one needs to see the ad. It makes no political statement at all except showing fathers with children and sometimes fathers and mothers parenting together, and one line in an utterly beautiful song (to the melody of ‘Hush Little Baby Don’t You Cry’) that says “We’ll read stories to help you dream, your mummy and I are a perfect team”. What a wonderful, positive, emotional ad that even includes encouragement by fathers for their girls to succeed in traditionally male-dominated occupations. Yet, apparently because it portrays child-rearing by a mother and father, it was deemed ‘political’ and pulled from screening during a time when a referendum was to be held in Australia regarding same-sex marriage. There was nothing in the ad criticizing other parenting arrangements or combinations. It simply portrayed in a positive way joint parenting by a mother and father, which now it seems amounts to a political statement to be censored. Another ridiculous development.
Regarding the story about Ms Scarlet’s call to change ‘Father’s Day’ to ‘Special Person’s Day’, what’s incredible is not so much some femaleist’s drive to further normalize the removal of fathers from children’s lives, but the fact that media would pay this any attention. The article’s claim that “a growing number of politically correct schools and kindergartens were adopting the move” was almost certainly false propaganda.
Comment by Ministry of Men's Affairs — Sat 9th September 2017 @ 11:01 am
Today’s lesson on equality
“Lorien Norman, 26, faced a maximum sentence of 13 years behind bars for the aggravated assault — but is a free woman because the judge said the baby’s injuries were “likely to resolve”.”
So if you’re a women, as long as the injuries are going to heal then all is good, move on next case.
“Last October, Miss Norman called police at 4am, threatening to throw Evie over the balcony of her unit.”
Where was the threatening to kill charge?
“Court documents revealed Miss Norman initially “lied” to police, claiming Evie had taken a fall while at a play gym the day before.”
Where is the making a false statement charge?
Who would have thought a women could lie.
“Whilst any assault of a child, particularly one of such a tender age and vulnerability, by a parent stands as a gross breach of trust, your offending is nevertheless far from the most serious of offending of this type in terms of the degree of force involved and the duration of the offending,” said Judge Costello told the court.
WTF? The child was hit at least 8 times! Look at the pictures how the hell is that far from the most serous? That’s only a few steps from head injuries causing permanent damage or death. Duration? The child gets a sustained beating then has the trauma of the mother saying she’s going to get thrown out a building as well as whatever took place when the police turned up.
““I’m not in jail,” the text message from Miss Norman to Mr McMahon read. “What’s your next move?”
Before responding, Miss Norman sent another message saying she’d “made it” and would have “part custody within a year”, despite having everyone on social media against her.”
Obviously her Borderline Personality Disorder is a concern. She probably turned on the waterworks for the judge but her true character shows in her texts.
So what’s the lesson?
1: Run like hell if the female has BPD.
2: For judges, stop being a bunch of foolish bigots.
Oops they are being told to not give females prison terms?
I think the photos could be great anti child abuse posters but we all know why they wouldn’t qualify.
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/adelaide-mother-escapes-jail-sentence-after-bashing-eightmonthold-daughter-with-a-spoon/news-story/88ffbab4d5ff9f2952ee6e4f303feedf
Comment by DJ Ward — Sat 9th September 2017 @ 11:18 am