The harm this woman has done to her children has been so extreme, it should be considered just as serious as rape and punished accordingly
Mr Michael Chriswell father of 5 children had them abducted from him for 10 years. His eldest son asked him to rescue him from the extremely alienating mother.
I understand Michael may now live in New Zealand.
The harm this woman has done to her children has been so extreme, it should be considered just as serious as rape. She is not fit to be a mother. She belongs in prison.
If you are able to add to this from your own situation, please put it here.
This only happens, because of the legal system.
How did he not get access, despite all the court cases.
Is just an allegation, all that is needed to ban a father.
She accused him of being bipolar, is he bipolar.
The video goes into little detail, what are we missing.
Alienators get others on there side, to attack the victim.
All the social media stuff, is a good example of her offending.
Why would you do any of that, it’s also a bit crazy.
Along with the boys story, which is convincing.
How often did the courts fail, to see the mother is the problem.
Comment by DJ Ward — Sat 3rd February 2024 @ 9:50 pm
Let’s say the father is flawed, and the custody decision is good.
That does not mean he should be banned, excluded completely.
I would face the same argument, my illness is my flaw.
So a result for custody is guaranteed, exclusion is about revenge.
You can accomodate the flawed father, with some form of contact.
The state banned the father, maximising his child support.
How can that be legal, to do such an evil thing.
You have children, but are banned from seeing them.
Not even a few hours each month, some minimum rights.
Banned to make more money, it’s not about his flaws.
A slave has no rights, even to there children.
Geez the judge said stop lying, he was paying child support.
He paid to be a parent, but had no rights as a parent.
It’s like selling goods, but never delivering the product.
If he never got the product, why was he forced to pay.
What if he is not flawed, the government is certainly a thief.
Comment by DJ Ward — Sun 4th February 2024 @ 8:54 am
When looking at motive, sex and money are a good start.
It may not be having sex, but jealousy about sex.
The jealousy has effects, like causing controlling behaviour.
The male getting a new girlfriend, results in jealousy.
If they can’t control them, they can certainly punish them.
In the social media, the ex wife accuses him of adultery.
It’s the same as saying, don’t have sex with him.
Even better if you get a reward, more money to be alienating.
The more you alienate from the child’s life, you get more money.
And money means opportunity for sex, so it’s like two for one.
They get to punish and control, all with a financial reward.
As the post points out, there is no punishment for the harm caused.
The parent motivated by sex and money, gets all the help they need.
As for people on social media, does the patsy know they’re a patsy.
The alienating parent, uses others to attack the former partner.
The accusation may be nonsense, but the reader believes it.
Because they believe it, they act as if it was true.
Any search of the person, results in reading nonsense.
You get the kids plus more money, then ruin his reputation as well.
It’s like the government is blind, they are the patsy.
Comment by DJ Ward — Sun 4th February 2024 @ 10:23 pm
false accusations and gas lighting is a serious fraud crime. Causing loss by deception – a crime seldom punished. 7 years prison. Alienation is a crime which harms children – have not seen or heard from my daughter since 2017. Taken away overseas by the narcissistic parent who lied, and made false accusations to the courts for years and got away with it. lawyers lied to the courts, covered up expert evidence of harm to the child, and protected and encouraged the abuser – inciting more conflict for money. never once putting the best interests of the child first.
Our book explains the tactics and how to best protect yourself from the lies and false accusations, the provocation, the lawyers lying to the courts, withholding evidence of harm, exploiting vulnerable kids and parents for money while protecting the abusers.
https://www.reputationguardian.nz/#book
Comment by Hornet — Sun 18th February 2024 @ 6:54 pm