ONE WOMAN CALLS IT OUT.
@reealvybes Men are tired. #mentalhealthawareness #mentalhealth #mensmentalhealth #relationshiptruths #menmentalhealthmatters
The presenter’s speech will leave you in no doubt what is going on.
It is truly violent to disrespect a man, compromise his wellbeing just so you can take his children and wealth.
It is typical. It is not the future. It has been going on for decades.
The knock on here is women are desperately seeking a man to settle down with. A man who already has property, who is financially stable, has a career and is ready for commitment. Try as they might, women can’t seem to get men to commit to an everlasting relationship.
Because men know everlasting is something beyond 3 years and one week.
It’s the biggest scam in town. Keep your guard up men. She doesn’t love you. She loves what you can provide and finally take from you.
She makes a good argument, how are the abused men responding.
I saw some figures on men, large numbers are intentionally single.
Many don’t even bother trying, they have never had a girlfriend.
Is there many men with one girlfriend, but then never again.
Are they good at economics, and watched the fathers get burnt.
They get indoctrination, taught in schools it’s men that abuse.
Violence is normalised, slapping a man in the face is culture.
They grew up without fathers, even alienated to hate the father.
Since they destroyed wanting to be a father, what use is a girlfriend.
If you do something that hurts a person, you get consequences.
You can begin a cycle of violence, that travels through time.
Men are bad to women, women respond by being bad to men.
So presently we are seeing the response, men are responding.
Rejection of women by men first, or women rejecting men first.
The enabler of the cycle of violence, laws helping predators.
The video talks about, the female who views males as prey.
I wonder where that ends up, in a cycle of violence.
Comment by DJ Ward — Tue 10th June 2025 @ 5:37 pm
She points out playing the victim, when that maybe nonsense.
Because there is real victims, how could you possibly tell if it’s true.
That’s likely human nature, both genders can play the victim card.
Both genders can manipulate emotions, to present themselves well.
Then of course lying by omission, presenting one sided stories.
Exaggerating what happened, even just plain old humans lying.
The question becomes gendered, who plays the victim better.
Judge she was violent to me, vs he was violent to me.
She was refusing to go to work, vs he didn’t want me to work.
She was violent then made me have sex, vs what’s called rape.
See playing the victim is gendered, it’s nearly automatic.
Comment by DJ Ward — Wed 11th June 2025 @ 6:01 pm
The worlds at war, it’s easy to then ignore everything else.
Men being treated like crap, is way down on the list of subjects.
They even report women and children killed, like men don’t count.
Even assassination is normalised, killing men is someone’s good news.
I’m to old for the draft, but you never know what could happen.
Gender may even become irrelevant, in the next war to end all wars.
The world is missing something, no peacemakers are in charge.
As for death tolls, 12 people a week suicide in NZ.
Most of them are men, like a silent war.
It doesn’t matter why they died, they probably deserved it.
Hence no outrage or condemnation, avoiding any self examination.
The video points out causing suicide, the men are victims.
Comment by DJ Ward — Tue 17th June 2025 @ 6:15 pm
Dear DJ Ward,
It seems as though you are still unaware of how to write proper sentences with correct grammar; this is a very unfortunate sight! Is there any particular reason you choose to write every sentence as a poorly written poem, or is that a performative choice? Regardless of this, I have seen progress in how you address the world and women—which is admirable. Though there is still a large amount of progress left to assist you in viewing life through a less-than-narrow lens.
-Kittenlvr
Comment by Kittenlvr54 — Thu 19th June 2025 @ 12:20 pm
There is really no set rules, in how to communicate.
My sentences are not poetry, they are arguments as emotions.
Each half is an emotion, together making a complex emotion.
A set of sentences creates an idea, an argument of its own.
If you look at how humans speak, it is also a string of emotions.
Millions and millions of sentences, exist just like mine.
So as long as things make sense, how to write is irrelevant.
Thanks for your comment Kittenlvr, I am trying to be open minded.
Comment by DJ Ward — Fri 20th June 2025 @ 8:53 am
“Though there is still a large amount of progress left to assist you in viewing life through a less-than-narrow lens.”
I think that’s an unavoidable thing, if you are looking at a subject.
You inherently narrow the argument, to come to a conclusion.
As an example for the post, let’s look at female sex offenders.
Look at how the police behave, regarding sex with under 16 years.
There is a % of who have sex U16, and a % resulting in an arrest.
How many males get arrested, vs how many females get arrested.
Many males get arrested, but very few females get arrested.
That is far from the statistics, of the % having sex U16.
Having sex with U16 boys is normalised, rarely seen as wrong.
The department of IRD, makes these boys pay child support.
It was a crime to have sex with them, if done to a girl it’s a crime.
How offensive is the act, making the rape victim pay the rapist.
See that’s a narrow argument, it certainly gets to a point.
Comment by DJ Ward — Sun 22nd June 2025 @ 4:36 pm
Kittenlvr…
Style over substance?
Comment by Greg Allan — Sun 22nd June 2025 @ 5:39 pm
I once read Law Commission stuff, proposing alimony.
The woman had a standard of living, she still should get it.
So the man must pay alimony, so she can have it.
Yet he also had a standard of living, now he lives in poverty.
There is no equal treatment, it’s simply absurd.
Thank God this is not the US, think of 2 and a 1/2 men as comedy.
So poor it’s like moving home, life wrecked in one relationship.
The bigotry is plain to see, yet all it brings is jokes.
What he was giving, he must continue giving.
What she was giving, she must continue giving.
See how things don’t sound correct, good sign somethings wrong.
Comment by DJ Ward — Wed 16th July 2025 @ 9:30 pm
Teaching boys to hate, cannot be a winning strategy.
It’s easy to do, indoctrinated empty minds with propaganda.
Think of the Israeli boys, think of the Palestinian boys.
Hate is an easy thing to make, the results can be evil.
So how do you tell the truth, this group does this bad thing.
If men are doing a bad thing, or if women are doing a bad thing.
A third of women experience DV, the television tells you so.
You may the hate men for DV, but what’s the victim figure for men.
So are girls taught to hate boys, look at all the bad men things.
What if you told the boys things, all the bad things that women do.
See teaching hate could be easy, all you need is the truth and media.
Girls taught not to respect boys, imagine boys not respecting girls.
How do you tell the truth, and teach to love not teach to hate.
Comment by DJ Ward — Fri 22nd August 2025 @ 5:53 pm
She gets the now but not where it started.
Children communicated within a paradigm.
Girls in particular by the way they presented themselves, the way they talked, acted, reacted and engaged with boys.
Feminism changed that in many ways but communication is a key element. Remove communication and the male has little left to do but look.
Then the male is accused of sexulalising females.
Comment by Anon — Sat 23rd August 2025 @ 4:25 pm
Thanks Anon for the comment, it gives an interesting point.
Speaking’s is restricted, like no sexualised words in the workplace.
Men certainly don’t say what they think, can you imagine that.
So you are correct about speaking, all men can do is look.
So what are we teaching boys, if they can’t speak or look.
How do they approach girls, if your automatically the predator.
Everything the boy does is bad, even romance may be dead.
Maybe now girls have all the power, they can do anything
If men did not sexualise women, humans would become extinct.
Comment by DJ Ward — Fri 29th August 2025 @ 6:04 pm
Is it men sexualising women, or do women sexualise themselves.
A woman can dress plain, or dress seductive with makeup.
Men don’t make that choice, but may respond to the difference.
Maybe there’s controlling men, women made to dress in a way.
But in an equal and free world, women could wear anything.
Women free to sexualise themselves, men would be innocent.
Yet if men respond in any way, magically they become predatory.
It doesn’t matter what she does, he is responsible for events.
A female could seduce a male, almost like catching prey.
Did the secretary screw the boss, or did the boss screw the secretary.
Comment by DJ Ward — Thu 4th September 2025 @ 5:48 pm
It’s hard to predict events, so how can you predict a person.
You may meet someone, and you are attracted to them.
One thing leads to another, all of a sudden it’s a relationship.
But really you don’t know the person, or what they would do.
You can’t predict violence, there’s no violence in the beginning.
You can’t predict sanity, they are fine now but not tomorrow.
You can’t predict if they will steal, the bank account emptied.
You can’t predict if they will leave you, and take your stuff.
You can’t predict if they will lie, saying they take contraception.
You can’t predict if they will cheat, and expose you to disease.
You can’t predict anything, it is an endless list of human sins.
Sounds like it’s to risky, humans don’t seem safe at all.
So why do relationships begin, nature winning over reality.
We are hard wired to take risks, hoping for the reward.
Decisions made in the present, desire for sex driving outcomes.
For better or worse, you can’t predict what your getting.
Comment by DJ Ward — Wed 10th September 2025 @ 5:36 pm