Reply To Maude
To take action against family lawyers at their homes will not effect changes to the system but will cause distress to their children and the children of the neighbourhood who, not surprisingly, find demonstrations outside their homes intimidating and frightening.
One has to wonder exactly which planet Mr Maude lives on. It surely can’t be the Third Rock From The Sun.
If he did Mr Maude would never the mention the ‘distress’ caused to sundry children of sundry lawyers who have been subjected to protest.
He wouldn’t because Mr Maude would measure the distress caused to a few confused children of these lawyers with the vast distress of the children these lawyers daily destroy, and see the relative stress caused to a few lawyers children as facile in comparison.
It is the truly distressed children you and your ilk should be protecting, Mr Maude, not the cossetted, indulged offspring of the real destroyers in our society (aka, your feminazi members and the judges who indulge them).
Think of the 300,000 + children who are now fatherless, thanks to the man-hatred regime that so many of your members have created.
Think of the 1,000+ street kids on just Aucklands streets alone. Doing drugs, prostitution, and alcohol. Stealing to support themselves, and living in the cold.
Nearly every last one of them is a run-away from a social welfare home. And how did they get into such homes? Because your vile associates in this immense crime against children (aka CYFS) put them there.
Then think of the 10’s of thousands of childless fathers whom your members have helped to render childless.
Then consider the 10’s of thousands of these childless fathers who are weekly stripped of their income while the ex lives with her new beau, sucking the childless father dry. Having broken her contractural vows of marriage, slept with another behind her partner’s back, then accused the ex of vileness just to get the money out of him and him out of her life and that of his children.
These are the men who your members have helped lead to slaughter by aiding and abbetting the false-allegation game.
These so-called high-moral folk, your lawyer members, should not be subjected to protest, Mr Maude.
Oh no, Mr Maude, they should all be struck off.
You, Mr Maude, and so many of your ilk, are an affront to the name of justice.
Please supply your address, ASAP, so we can all let you taste the bitterness so many of us have had to swallow at the hands of your often deceitful, and extremely destructive ilk.