MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Female-Father Uber Alles – UK style

Filed under: General — MurrayBacon @ 8:51 pm Sun 11th October 2009

I have seen with my own eyes, children removed from parents and made available for adoption by female//female parents.

Uk Government is putting out screeds and screeds and screeds of new Family rules. To me, it looks as though the “Family” issues are getting lost in layers and layers of 1984 style legalese=paperwork. It’s all reminiscent of Catch 22.

They want to be seen doing something, without actually healing the legal worker’s rort.

Layers and layers of beaurocracy and paper mache, beaurocracy and more paper mache, interlaid with fee gouging, whilst carefully achieving less than nothing. More and more Rules, adding up to just less and less service to those who should be protected.

If you look at how frequently our FamilyCaught Rules have been “updated”, you can see that the familycaught stooges have been meddling with our “Rules” like goalposts dancing all round the paddock.

Below the latest droppings from the UK Labour Government shithouse on fathers before we are heading for general elections time in the middle of 2010:

In the UK family law proceedings rules “the father of the child” is now replaced and substituted by:
“the father or parent (being a woman who is a parent by virtue of section 43 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008) of the child if that person”

So lets be clear about one thing: It’s payback time.

The gender racist Labour party needs to be voted down from government for the next couple of decades.

The showdowntime is at: the next general UK Elections in mid 2010

Peter Tromp

The Family Proceedings (Amendment) (No.3) Rules 2009
Statutory Instruments 2009 No. 2027 (L. 22) Family Proceedings

Supreme Court Of England And Wales
County Courts, England And Wales

The Family Proceedings Rule Committee makes the following Rules in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(1) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984(1):

Made 21st July 2009
Laid before Parliament 22nd July 2009
Coming into force as provided in rule 1(2)

Amendments to the Family Proceedings Rules 1991

Rule 8.
In rule 4A.1, in the definition of “the birth father”, after “section 28 of the 1990 Act” insert “or by sections 35 to 40 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008(3)”.

Rule 20.
In Appendix 3, in the second entry–
(a) in column (i), after “4(3),” insert “4ZA(1)(c), 4ZA(6),”; and
(b) in column (iv), for “the father of the child if he”, substitute “the father or parent (being a woman who is a parent by virtue of section 43 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008) of the child if that person”.

Rules 8 and 20 shall come into force on 1st September 2009

These Rules may be cited as the Family Proceedings (Amendment) (No.3) Rules 2009.

Mark Potter,P
Duncan Adam
Bruce Edgington
Angela Finnerty
Charles Hyde
David Salter
Philip Waller

I allow these Rules

Bridget Prentice
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State
Ministry of Justice

21st July 2009

Don’t let your paranoia run away…., MurrayBacon lesbian axe-murderer – I murder lesbian axes.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar