Is this judge lying through his teeth?
UK Guardian: Courts will not give up on girl abducted by mother, judge warns
Judge issues warning two years after Humma Dar disappeared with daughter Aamina Khan after girl’s father was given custody.
It is well known in legal circles, but a carefully manipulated secret from the working public, that most child abductors (85%) are the mothers of the children.
This is illustrated in Robin Bowles book “Taken in Contempt” and shows up wherever careful statistics are gathered.
In my opinion, legal workers milk child abductions for all they can squeeze out, without any integrity, soul, heart, mercy, conscience or humanity.
Are they proactive in deterring or preventing abductions, hell no. They usually leave the window carefully open to facilitate and allow mothers to perpetrate their abductions. They are then able to milk the subsequent legal processes, until the left behind families have descended into insanity or their wealth has all been charged to legal workers.
Are the legal workers swayed by bouncing breasts and soft faces, images of orgasms, or by evidence-less fairy tales of domestic violence, where they can be Quixotic heroes, or by by milking the breasts?
Sure, after separation both parents cannot have their fairy tale wishes met in full.
Protecting children from parent’s selfishness and ignorance about the needs of children just isn’t happening in secret familycaught$, who refuse to apply law to custodial mothers.
After the child has been taken, what are these judges doing to facilitate the return of the child?
The answer to that question, is the measure of the value of these legal functionaries.
The underlying truth is that children lie almost completely unprotected from international abduction, because familycaught$ all around the world are so greedy for “work”, or asset stripping parents, that they refuse to respect other countries familycaught$ and want to rehear every case. The Hague Convention was supposedly meant to get past that, but it was corrupted by familycaught$, by simply ignoring it. In this respect, NZ familycaught$ is among the worst in the world, making NZ an attractive destination for international mother abductors.
Protecting children from judge’s greed, selfishness and ignorance about the needs of children just isn’t happening in secret familycaught$, who refuse to apply law to custodial mothers. Outcomes for Abducted Children A study of child abduction in the UK
If a judge is on a fixed salary, how can they benefit personally by enabling a child abduction?
A few years earlier, another judge opened the door for an abduction. The resulting legal work created the need for employing another judge, in fact this particular judge. By feeding the growth of abductions, we “need” to employ more judges. Indirect benefit, but valuable to all judges nonetheless. Subtle, but at the end of the year, real dollars in surreal judge’s pockets. Also, the abductions result in “work” for lawyers, much of it paid for by squeezing the Government, thus having a small lifting effect on judge’s salaries. Lots of small effects, but put together a good fraction of the NZ average pretax wage. Conflict of interest
In my opinion, in the end, familycaught$ judges are more dangerous to children, than abducting mothers. If disincentives to abduction were applied, by meaningful bonds and by prosecuting abductors, then children would be protected.
With familycaught$ refusing to honour legislation, best it just be scrapped.
Maybe secrecy is the first enemy of protecting children?
Lets put protecting children’s upbringing before legal worker’s paramount need for other people’s wealth.