Police Proudly Parade Their Anti-Male Sexism
Check out this remarkable news item. Police white-knighting for damsels who are not in distress.
“How do you know she’s consenting?” Apart from the fact she has her tongue in your mouth and her hand down your underpants? A better question might be “How do you know she won’t withdraw her consent retrospectively tomorrow or in 30 years?”, the answer to which will always be “That can’t be known”. One might hope that this police harassment of people going about lawful activity will cause some males to consider joining the MGTOW code, but that seems very unlikely. Most young guys will continue to be ruled by their penis especially after alcohol consumption, and regardless of equal drunkenness will continue to be held exclusively responsible for women’s sexual participation.
I can not believe a policeman said this, …from above linked article..
….( the penalty for getting consent wrong is huge,” he told the Herald.) It must be code warning to all males out there,,, “THANKS FOR THE HEADS UP MAN”..and if it is really a code warning to all males out there,,, THEN TAKE HEED.
This is what a Detective Sergeant does on a Friday night?
In the construction of the article I’m wondering how this was added to by the media?
This is something different, a form of entrapment.
A student is taught a concept of consent.
Within that, consent in established.
He’s damned if he doesn’t answer but to answer the ‘male offender’ at that moment, is forced to pick a specific point at which she consented (which is deniable) or explain his view of the entire concept of consent within that individual encounter.
There is another issue regarding policing as we know it.
Our concept of police is born within the Criminal Justice system established in England.
If you look at the origins of Polis in Europe this is the enforcement of policy in the early Civil Law of Europe.
We are not seeing signs in central Wellington saying sexual activity or attempting to establish consent is illegal, and offenders will be prosecuted.
What we are seeing is enforcement of policy. Exactly what that policy might be, is not clear. What is being policed is some form of policy around consent.
This is a very confused article.
GLOW IN THE DARK cardboard cutouts of police in every bar with piercing red video camera eyes and directional audio recording ears.
# 4,,, Evan …and glow in the dark finger print powder for evidential proof of where fingers wandered.