Law In A Nutshell LIAN course
Message from The Mangere Community Law Centre who are inviting you to register for the Law In A Nutshell (LIAN) programme.
Spaces are limited so please register.
You are more than welcome to attend the sessions that are relevant to your line of work.
This is a basic introduction to law. This programme is designed to help people understand their legal rights.
LIAN is open to everyone and we strongly encourage members of the community and practitioners of all sectors of our society to join.
We offer an eight-week programme covering a wide-range of topics as listed below.
These sessions are facilitated by lawyers, crown prosecutors, police, youth law practitioners, immigration advisers, legal policy analysts and legal educators.
We cover the following topics:
Introduction to law New Zealand legal system Criminal law
Police powers Employment law Consumer law
Tenancy Housing Youth law
Education Will & powers of attorney Immigration law
Family law Domestic violence
To register – complete the registration form attached and send it to E: [email protected] or contact us on P: (09) 275 4310
The details of the course are as follows:
Date:
Every Wednesday from Wed 1st May – Wed 19th June 2019
Time:
9:30am – 12.30pm
Venue:
Mangere Community Law Centre – Mangere Town Centre/Shop 27
Waddon Place (Next to NZ post/Mangere markets carpark)
Cost:
$5 per week ($40 for the entire course). Course materials and morning tea.
Payment arrangements can be made. Please contact us if this will be an issue as we want to ensure that cost will not be a barrier to attendance.
Account details
MANGERE COMMUNITY LAW CENTRE
BANK ACCOUNT: 12-3110-0011193-00
Code: LIAN Reference: Your name
Hi Murray, there is no registration form here that I can see..
Comment by mama — Thu 2nd May 2019 @ 1:10 pm
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/123934185/killers-bizarre-explanation-for-why-he-murdered-young-friend
This case shows some interesting things to me.
Most important is he is not trying to explain away his actions.
Pretending to be innocent.
It doesn’t say the reasons behind her conviction.
But his comment about her involvement is rational to me.
That she talked about the situation that they were in.
He doesn’t seem to accuse her directly.
But rather he came to a very irrational conclusion to those comments and murdered.
It is good to see he is accepting of his actions.
Now just good support and guidance is needed.
Learning how he ended up doing what happened.
And a support structure keeping him on a good path when he gets released.
The possibility exists he is flawed due to irrational thinking.
Why he didn’t tell the truth in the beginning is interesting.
Or why the legal system didn’t expose it.
The sex offending story is confusing to me.
Is it even true?
What was its influence on the trial.
Wouldn’t the assault victim be the one to fear about complaining.
Would a partner stay with a man after finding out about the assault.
If the victim was present, why no interference of the assault.
I struggle to make sense of the situation.
Would the victim not have joined in, or helped if they were present.
If they didn’t interfere, stoping it.
It’s possible he just watched, even if it was due to fear.
The reasons for murder are slim.
And doesn’t explain his partners actions.
Why did she not like the victim, to say the things she said?
To encourage murder, or worse.
There is too much missing in this story.
His new confession is possible.
It doesn’t sound right for some reason.
Extremely paranoid resultant to murder just for that.
Notice both have paranoia as the reason.
I would want to explore that prior to his release.
Comment by DJ Ward — Wed 13th January 2021 @ 6:09 pm