Courts right to decide paternity
As per the current family court policies it can be decided by the court to place paternal responsibilities on a father without proving paternity in many situations.
Studies also show that as many as 1 in 10 fathers are not biologically the fathers of their children and can end up raising and paying child support for a child that is not theirs.
It is suggested that if there is a chance of children being someone else’s in cases where cheating is suspected being as high as 30%.
It’s suggested that all fathers get a paternity test done in order to insure your position and legal responsibilities before you could possibly end up with a lifetime of responsibility to children who might not be yours.
Courts right to choose paternity
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/pp/PP54/PP54-8_.html
Better Bachelor discussing fake paternities and false paternities
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LxpxNhDrPc
Studies also show that as many as 1 in 10 fathers are not biologically the fathers of their children and can end up raising and paying child support for a child that is not theirs.
It is suggested that if there is a chance of children being someone else’s in cases where cheating is suspected being as high as 30%.
It’s suggested that all fathers get a paternity test done in order to insure your position and legal responsibilities before you could possibly end up with a lifetime of responsibility to children who might not be yours.
Courts right to choose paternity
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/pp/PP54/PP54-8_.html
Better Bachelor discussing fake paternities and false paternities
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LxpxNhDrPc
Every child has a human right to know who their biological parents are. As in their name of their parents. This has nothing to do with the mother or the court or anything. It is the human right of the child.
Paternity tests should be compulsory at birth for the human right of the child. The mother should have zero say in this. Obviously the alleged father can not be compelled to give a DNA sample, but other wise the test should be compulsory.
Comment by Vman — Fri 28th August 2020 @ 3:59 pm
Courts are very reluctant in confirming questionable paternity and for the reason.
Comment by Anatoly — Tue 1st September 2020 @ 5:33 pm
Paternity fraud is a Crime Against Humanity committed by the Crown.
There are 3 victim groups. The defenceless newborn, the false father, and the real father.
The Crown is fully aware of it’s offending as it legislates to prevent accountability. Allowing perjury, forcing compliance, giving legal status to corrupt documents, and destroying evidence.
Paternity fraud includes females who do not name the father, generally done using child support as the threat to remove the father from potential custody issues. The father extorted for a smaller sum of money increasing in effect her income.
The child suffers the loss of heritage, ethnicity, medical history. The mother in 100% of cases commits the crime of Dishonest use of a Legal Document for Personal Financial Gain. Using the defenceless newborn to commit the crime.
The false father is not only the victim of the blatant financial crime but also, often forced marriage. A Crime Against Humanity. All sex in forced marriages is Rape. While raping men in NZ is legal, it is not legal under international law for governments to Rape. The government knowing paternity fraud occurs conspires to extort money from these victims in the child support system. The Ministry of Internal affairs plays it’s role, followed by IRD. The police assist by blocking any attempt to apply the law in regard to the mothers financial crime. Indirect financial crimes occur with property rights etc.
The false father is also prevented by the government from having children by the government. A Crime Against Humanity. This occurs due to the father believing he is a father when he is not. Exterminating his genetics.
The real father has his legal rights of guardianship removed from him by the Crowns facilitation of the offending. It is a Crime Against Humanity to without cause, remove children from an identifiable group.
The legal professionals of NZ being profoundly corrupt on this issue do so for Personal Financial Gain. They make money from the process. The also make money from the sundry resultants of the offending, for example domestic violence prosecutions when men are arrested for getting angry when discovering the profoundly unjust crime the Crown conspired to commit against them.
The Police use DNA testing for any male sex offending but never (1 event in NZ history) for any female sex offence. DNA testing is in breach of the Human Rights Act in NZ as result. Many prosecutions of men being corrupted. Paternity Fraud allows females to commit incest, and child sex offending. Both crimes vastly underinvestigated when females offend. While female compliants are arbitrarily listened to, and investigated this sex crime is never investigated. The police in most cases will actually arrest the male for making a paternity fraud allegation as in DV situations. For being angry.
Summary.
Arrest the Prime Minister for commiting this sex crime involving children.
Comment by DJ Ward — Wed 2nd September 2020 @ 11:26 am
ur comment was too accurate DJ Ward. i can only concur.
Comment by phil r watts — Wed 9th September 2020 @ 11:12 pm
The courts right to decide paternity.
There is no decision, there is only the one truth.
Who are they who judge what they cannot judge.
Hypocrite I say.
There is only one judge who can honour the mother and the father.
No human judge could possibly judge the truth.
Otherwise it not be the truth.
Hypocrite I say.
You human judge.
You judge the defenceless child.
Did you not listen as the child left the dark and entered the light.
Was it crying for what it had lost or what it had gained.
Hypocrite I say.
You human judge.
You have all the fathers you could possibly want to judge.
Yet only one is the truth.
Hypocrite I say.
You human judge.
Who be your own father.
Shall the defenceless child cry your name in vain.
Comment by DJ Ward — Sat 21st November 2020 @ 10:28 pm
#3 is an important comment, as it let me make a decision.
And for me, a diary entry showing when I made the decision.
That decision was to offend, so I could present a defence.
Having #3 written, convinced me I was ready setting the date.
I did not know why it was important, but it has been a constant reminder.
In my defence it must be read, as my motive for offending.
I can do much better, than I have written.
Even if they defy logic, and disallow a diary entry.
It creates great talking points, about sex crimes.
And not even the subject, I offended with.
It’s therefore a source of humour, for me.
#5 is a remarkably different, way of communicating.
Comment by DJ Ward — Tue 17th May 2022 @ 6:07 pm
Geez, today I’ve laughed a few times.
Imagine having to read my diary, my comments.
Comment #3, started events.
Questioning my motive, geez.
Comment by DJ Ward — Sun 5th February 2023 @ 2:20 pm