50 Years of the Big D
DISCRIMINATION
When we look at the significant criticism of the US Supreme Court by both the Prime minister, Jacinda Ardern and Foreign Minister, Nanaia Mahuta, along with a chorus of support, of course there is more to it …
MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.
2 Responses to “50 Years of the Big D”
Leave a Reply
Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.
This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.
There is a post on the recent full time abortion legislation here https://menz.org.nz/2018/abortion-at-a-womans-whim/
This is a good challenge, to a law.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/us-canada/300633821/pregnant-us-woman-given-t2-lane-ticket-argues-foetus-is-passenger
As the baby is a person, or it’s not a person.
When in a pregnancy, can they start claiming privilege.
As many woman could claim pregnancy, for the privilege.
Anti abortion activists, certainly make claims the foetus is a person.
The law has a contradiction, that should side on a persons rights.
What rights does a foetus have, to be counted equally.
Or do we ignore pregnancy, requiring birth.
Does every decision like Dobbs, cause new arguments.
Once the dust settles, new SCOTUS cases will occur.