MENZ ISSUES

MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

The Importance Of Fathers

Filed under: General — Lukenz @ 8:40 pm Wed 31st August 2022

US Statistics

75% Of long term correctional facilities inmates are from father absent households
90% Of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.

Children from fatherless homes are;

120% Greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse.
4.6x More likely to commit suicide
10.8x More likely to commit rape
15.5x More likely to end up in prison

4 Responses to “The Importance Of Fathers”

  1. DJ Ward says:

    In US politics fatherless homes, is a subject.
    But with few solutions, other than marriage.
    So the argument, gets poisoned by religion.
    And real solutions, are like poison to feminism.
    Non racist outcomes, are like poison to racists.

    So the thing that must be fixed, is ignored.
    Name a single government, with policy.
    Who measures fatherlessness, aiming to be better.
    Who has investigated, cause of the absent father.

    …………

    The high rate of rape, is interesting.
    Firstly the ratio is high, so fathered rapists are few.
    As sexual history of rapists, is likely abused as a child.
    What percentage had sexual events, with the mother.
    Or in many cases, allowed by the mother.
    An isolated child, an easy target.

    So the role model of a father, greatly reduces risk.
    As very few fathered children, go on to rape.
    The figure of rapists exists, but maybe not due to biology.
    The elephant argument, does not quite work.
    The absent father, causing behaviour issues.
    Or the absent father, enabling abuse related issues.

    Rape is the boy result, but what is the girl result.
    Looking at the bad results of boys, is ok.
    But half the outcomes, are missing.

  2. DJ Ward says:

    This questions, the importance of fathers.
    Because the judiciary, have given different sentences.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/129818048/supreme-court-judges-ask-what-about-the-kids-after-drugcourier-couple-get-notably-different-sentences

    If the offending was identical, why different sentences.
    Who looks after the children, the system saying mum.
    But that’s no justification, for a different sentence.
    Should they take turns, with prison time.
    Taking turns, being a solo parent.
    The father valued no less, than the mother.

    In this case, maybe you can discriminate.
    The father with history, the mother without.
    So we see discrimination, but it may be fair.

  3. golfa says:

    #2 because Pussy Pass.

  4. DJ Ward says:

    The more I think about it, the more correct you are.
    Because in the details, it gets worse.

    “He also spent six months in custody before being released on bail”

    So from the beginning, he was discriminated against.
    She committed the same crime, but wasn’t imprisoned.
    The police from the beginning, made a parenting decision.
    Without hesitation, the male lost the argument.

    Worse again if you considered, other defendants.
    How is a male without children, sentenced in comparison.
    The woman, without children.
    The female, heavily pregnant at sentencing.
    The single male, or single woman.
    Each one stereotyped, by the police.

    If any are treated harsher, is that justice.
    Who you are, governs your sentence.

    All done, in the kings name.

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar