MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

The Importance Of Fathers

Filed under: General — Lukenz @ 8:40 pm Wed 31st August 2022

US Statistics

75% Of long term correctional facilities inmates are from father absent households
90% Of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.

Children from fatherless homes are;

120% Greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse.
4.6x More likely to commit suicide
10.8x More likely to commit rape
15.5x More likely to end up in prison

7 Responses to “The Importance Of Fathers”

  1. DJ Ward says:

    In US politics fatherless homes, is a subject.
    But with few solutions, other than marriage.
    So the argument, gets poisoned by religion.
    And real solutions, are like poison to feminism.
    Non racist outcomes, are like poison to racists.

    So the thing that must be fixed, is ignored.
    Name a single government, with policy.
    Who measures fatherlessness, aiming to be better.
    Who has investigated, cause of the absent father.


    The high rate of rape, is interesting.
    Firstly the ratio is high, so fathered rapists are few.
    As sexual history of rapists, is likely abused as a child.
    What percentage had sexual events, with the mother.
    Or in many cases, allowed by the mother.
    An isolated child, an easy target.

    So the role model of a father, greatly reduces risk.
    As very few fathered children, go on to rape.
    The figure of rapists exists, but maybe not due to biology.
    The elephant argument, does not quite work.
    The absent father, causing behaviour issues.
    Or the absent father, enabling abuse related issues.

    Rape is the boy result, but what is the girl result.
    Looking at the bad results of boys, is ok.
    But half the outcomes, are missing.

  2. DJ Ward says:

    This questions, the importance of fathers.
    Because the judiciary, have given different sentences.

    If the offending was identical, why different sentences.
    Who looks after the children, the system saying mum.
    But that’s no justification, for a different sentence.
    Should they take turns, with prison time.
    Taking turns, being a solo parent.
    The father valued no less, than the mother.

    In this case, maybe you can discriminate.
    The father with history, the mother without.
    So we see discrimination, but it may be fair.

  3. golfa says:

    #2 because Pussy Pass.

  4. DJ Ward says:

    The more I think about it, the more correct you are.
    Because in the details, it gets worse.

    “He also spent six months in custody before being released on bail”

    So from the beginning, he was discriminated against.
    She committed the same crime, but wasn’t imprisoned.
    The police from the beginning, made a parenting decision.
    Without hesitation, the male lost the argument.

    Worse again if you considered, other defendants.
    How is a male without children, sentenced in comparison.
    The woman, without children.
    The female, heavily pregnant at sentencing.
    The single male, or single woman.
    Each one stereotyped, by the police.

    If any are treated harsher, is that justice.
    Who you are, governs your sentence.

    All done, in the kings name.

  5. DJ Ward says:

    For many fatherless homes, that was the intention.
    Lesbians getting pregnant, were never having a father.
    A female choosing dependency, never wanted the father.
    The just want a baby female, didn’t care about the father.

    It is society, that is accepting those things.
    But it’s not only society, paying for that choice.
    To support those choices, society supports fatherless homes.
    It’s at some monetary cost to taxpayers, yet it’s normalised.
    It’s society that is ignoring the reality, of the bad outcomes.

    It is society, that then punishes the male.
    It has to blame someone else, rather than itself.
    The women’s choice, is made his responsibility.
    Her with near guaranteed custody, him maybe with visits.

    What male choices, are women responsible for.
    He will be paying the price, for eighteen years.
    And less contact, gets rewarded with more money.
    The child then pays the price, in bad outcomes.

    Imagine men, being willing participants.
    Rather than prey, for sexual predators.
    Maybe the fatherless rate, will fall.

  6. Downunder says:

    The end result is that inadequate women have real life dolls to play with.

  7. DJ Ward says:

    The post says, 10.8 times more likely to commit rape.
    So how is that explained, by feminists.
    Who have no problem, with fatherless children.
    What then is inevitable, if the statistics are ignored.

    Men commit sex crimes, causing more fatherless children.
    Fatherless children, inherently commit far more sex crimes.
    More men then are considered, a risk to children.
    More children become fatherless, and we get more sex crimes.

    Before you know it, in just a few generations.
    Men can’t respect women, and you do get a rape culture.
    The female somehow made an object, for ones body count.
    Laws even ignored, the relationship or person not considered.

    How does that happen, in the solo mother scenario or culture.
    What was present, and what was missing.
    What was learnt, and what was not taught.
    What did they experience, and missed out on experiencing.

    Since I was born, both cultures have grown.

Leave a Reply

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar