- promoting a clearer understanding of men's experience -
Fathers are treated as so unimportant that whoever wrote and authorized this article didn’t see any need to explain why the father(s) of these children were not caring for them when the mother was a meth addict and had already been found to neglect them. In fact, the article didn’t mention father at all. Perhaps the children were from virgin births.
Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.
This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.
Contact me for rates
NZ teacher Peter Joyce’s settled life was disrupted when a woman he had never met accused him of historic rape. With a unique brand of angry humour, his diary plots the stages of his despair and traces his attempts to find justice in the face of the current insistence that we must “believe the victim”.
Dry Ice is a compelling memoir, but much more. The accusation made the writer a reluctant expert on similar cases from all over the world. He throws light on everything that limits public knowledge of false sexual allegations, from dangerous counselling to flawed statistics, and he exposes police investigation methods as blinkered, inefficient and insensitive.
You can purchase Dry Ice on Kindle for just $6.00 here: https://www.amazon.com/Dry-Ice-Peter-Joyce-ebook/dp/B01N19JKAR
Peter Joyce writes a blog: www.blackstonesdrum.com
It never fails to amaze me how these so called professions knew what was going on and did nothing. To me personally, your just as guilty.
Those poor kids deserved a life which was taken away and yes was very avoidable.
Women who fail parenting, don’t name the father.
They know the father, and use access for money.
It’s the only method, of guaranteed custody.
The father, automatically loses all rights.
No legal process is needed, to ban fathers in NZ.
The court then not examining, the females competency.
Putin has just found out, taking children is a crime.
It is government policy in NZ, to ban fathers automatically.
Nothing happens, with lies on birth certificates.
Both men who are fathers, even those who are not.
It is the crown then, who abuses the newborn.
It is the enabler, no different than the doing act itself.
It’s no surprise, why statistics are so bad.
The fatherless children, with appalling statistics.
The legal profession, loving it.
They make money, by abusing men’s rights.
The more fatherless a child, the more crimes boys then commit.
Intentional making offenders, for there own financial gain.
They hardly prosecute women, so they can make money from boys.
This was an issue 25-20 years ago.
The expectation is that fathers will simply provide regardless.
Jim Bagnall encountered cases like this, however assisting fathers was virtually an impossible task.
If a father did take action on behalf of a child a mother could generally have a protection order and a order/warrant within 24 hours.
I heard today, of a male child not doing well.
Behind in schooling, and needing a psychologist.
From a broken home early, and with only a part time dad.
The mother is good, but also a little bit dysfunctional.
What do we blame, for the child’s results.
I can’t blame the mother, as she is trying to be good.
Maybe we can blame the male, choosing work over parenting.
Maybe it’s culture, that created the outcome.
Society, stereotypes outcomes.
It’s output, is versions of fatherless children.
The fathers made to provide, not parent.
Yet the child doesn’t need money, it needs relationships.
What happens then, when the mothers not good.
From the start, there is no father.
Having a part time dad, would still help protect the child.
Not to its to late does society notice, the child now damaged.
Deciding not to have a father, is both legal and culture.
Humans are interesting creatures, in the animal kingdom.
Because our closest relatives, are not paternal.
The fathers, have no role in child rearing.
Child raised by creatures, is mostly only maternal.
Some birds do, and the extreme the seahorse.
So it’s no surprise, that mothers are seen as fit and able.
It’s programmed, into how our minds think.
Fathers are new, and is what made humans.
The child learning more, from two parents.
But fathers remain, behind in evolution.
Our behaviour changed, but genetics didn’t.
Our brains not seeing, fathers as the same as mothers.
Just as fit and able, and just as important.
Maybe the truth, is in the middle.
We are maternal, and partly paternal.