The Duluth Model – Why the narrator calls them feminists bigots
I did not agree with the swastika. But after viewing the clip I can draw a parallel between racism and the hate and persecution of the male gender. I took a closer look and realised it is a combination of the symbol for women with the swastika in it.
That was the moment I understood, “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” – Mark Twain.
This very powerful video is an excellent review how the Duluth model transpired over time.
Built upon deception and deceit, the Duluth model is debunked as a one way scheme to defraud children of their right to have a relationship with their father. The father’s paternal and property rights.
Once in place, the feminists pursued an aggressive criminal court intervention process that included housing, child support and enhanced police protection. The closed court was then setup to hide the procedure of ignoring dads evidence by not including it. That court is called the family court.
There is a lot in this 16-minute clip. Towards the end there is advice on how men should protect themselves.
The narrator calls the feminists bigots.
How did the ideology spreed, why becoming widely accepted.
How could you credibly reference it, in a science publication.
The data, not actually supporting theory.
You must read, how it came to its conclusion.
The evidence shows, it’s actually a load of rubbish.
No more reliable, than tarot cards or star signs.
Yet feminists embraced it, like religion.
Courts and lawyers love it, men can be punished for anything.
They’re a man, just somewhere on an imaginary wheel.
Finally women can get revenge, and the house.
To this day I am still shocked at our national dv rate. at the rate of child abuse etc etc.
Its a joke that there are always excuses for the abusers (i use this term loosely) to get away with it.
My daughter took her mother to criminal court (more than once).
As she was a minor, CYFS (as it was then) got involved.
I have never in my life heard such made up stories to hide the fact these people knew abuse was going on and DID NOTHING! why, because the abuser was a woman.
Our daughter was “stolen” from my care in 20xx by the family court and I was ordered to have no contract with either of them.
I am shocked that even my daughters lawyer (not beating about the bush here) knew what was said was LIES! and yet told the court the meeting was a complete success.
I saw her one last time and I was told not to tell her that would be the last time she sees me.
Glad this is the best interest of child.
No one from victim support or otherwise at the time offered any support for either my daughter or myself (or anyone else related to me). Yet the mother got support.
The best interests of children, gets ignored.
How is it when the solution to them, is less people.
As a result, the child has less parents.
Yet statistics on fatherless children, are shocking.
My brother, is a good parent.
Raised two good boys, with his now partner.
But as a teenager, just a boy and pregnant.
The bigots banned him, with having a relationship with the child.
The excuse being, not in a relationship during pregnancy.
They didn’t ban her, for exactly the same reason.
Not in a relationship with the father, during pregnancy.
Certainly they robbed him, with child support.
Yet the child, ended up in state care.
They didn’t deliver the child, to a good mans doorstep.
I cannot forgive them, justice was bigoted.
There is problems, with using derogatory terms.
I assume nobody, likes being called a bigot.
My last comment wrong, with use of words.
They can be used against you, defining a persons identity.
I don’t like racism, I think the argument is silly.
Racism only creates more racism, like a cycle.
Whites not liking blacks, causes blacks to not like whites.
Blacks not liking whites, causes whites to not like blacks.
That should be true, for any racial conflict.
One group thinking they are superior, when they are not.
The other group then think they are superior, when they are not.
The ego of the person, thinking they are the perfect creature.
In some ways religious conflict, has the same problem.
The facts of the religion, are not argued.
Just as the facts of race, are like a banned subject.
Religion creates an identity, ego sees the others as wrong.
It was good to see, society used democracy to say no.
His ideology rejected, by voting against him.
The argument says it, I don’t need to call him names.
While I don’t agree with the symbolism and some of the final conclusion, its confronting to hear a Duluth founder admit the disingenuous nature of what they did. It’s plain terrifying to know that despites the admissions – the model remains fundamentally the same and continues to rip men’s lives apart.
Thanks for finding and posting this. Yes, it’s amazing that the Duluth model is still the basis of DV management and law, even despite this 5-year-old video and the older information it presents. Amazing but not surprising.