3 Comments »

1. 

   Works for me. How about you?

   Comment by Downunder — Sat 13th August 2022 @ 7:58 am

2. 

   She says a lot, in a short video.

   Some of men’s best advocates, started out as feminists.
   They just happened to look at men, with the same beliefs.
   What exactly, is the rights of women.

   How brief is the housewife, in history.
   Just centuries ago, even the children worked.
   Some women see not working, as a right.
   Even men only briefly had voting, before women.
   The world is vastly different, and rapidly in time.

   But it cannot be avoided, children are a big commitment.
   And for society having children must happen.
   Maybe it’s better to give it perspective, over ones full life.
   If the goal is two children, how long to actually raise them.
   What is fair to the child, preschool years needs full time care.

   Better yet is a harder question, for society.
   What culture of having babies, are we making.
   Can’t we think positively, for women’s employment.
   The working from home employee, a big advance for mothers.
   Strangely pre industrial revolution, that was normal.

   What is this new normal, feminism wants to have.

   Comment by DJ Ward — Sat 13th August 2022 @ 5:08 pm

3. 

   I am actually hopeful, for this business.
   Because it has gone from a corporate, to private ownership.

   I remember a job interview, with the owner.
   His office was like a lookout, over the workshop.
   The idea of low productivity, wasn’t an option.
   In the corporate, the bosses are just workers.
   Far less likely, to actually care about results.

   https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/world/300725767/twitter-may-not-survive-the-musk-revolution

   So as a corporate takeover, it was vulnerable.
   If you cut all spending by 10%, it becomes profitable.
   A corporate can become wasteful, with lower productivity.
   Twitter is paying huge wages, and extra benefits.
   Someone running it for themselves, could transform Twitter.
   Saving 20% for the same sales, makes it really profitable.

   “Twitter is not a cheap business to run. It has 7500 staff with average compensation of more than US$250,000.”

   It’s not hard to see, that things could work out.
   How many workers don’t create that $250,000, justifying the job.
   Less wasteful spending, more productive spending.
   A 10% rise in revenue, also creates profitability.

   To justify the price, it must start paying dividends.
   And you never know, what he might try for that to happen.
   And how he uses it, with his other assets.
   Cheap Tesla adds, or services with his global internet.

   The author thinks Trump, needs censorship.
   That may be a better test, than profitability.
   Can he allow free speech, or will he fold to political views.

   Comment by DJ Ward — Sun 30th October 2022 @ 12:01 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Δ