MENZ Issues: news and discussion about New Zealand men, fathers, family law, divorce, courts, protests, gender politics, and male health.

Deconstructing Feminism

Filed under: General — Downunder @ 8:24 am Thu 3rd March 2016

This post follows on from End The Gender War.

If I was to put Feminism in an ideological/political category, I’d go for totalitarian, and for that reason you cannot be ‘a man’ in a society of this nature. That eventually is completely taken away from you, and you only need look at some of the young males who are a product of our society today, to see this as a reality.

In the previous post I said:

If you do not understand your enemy, you put yourself at a great disadvantage.

What was the starting point that Feminism adopted?

First, that men were the enemy, and second that Feminists needed to understand their enemy. They realised that men and women are different, not just physically, but functionally different, so they analysed us, worked us out.

In knowing that men and women are compatible but different creatures in the same species, Feminists then had two basic weapons.

The first was knowing how to mislead women, and the second was knowing how to attack men. Beyond that, Feminism is a political strategy which is not an accident. It has been a global strategy that started in Europe long before women got the vote, progressed through England, America, and eventually to New Zealand.

When we start seeing Feminism as actual damage to society, this is a very recent aspect in the timeline of Feminist development. These tyrants have a long history of development, knowledge and experience that has been passed down through centuries, not for the benefit of society but for the sole purpose of their political conquest.

Feminism is an intergenerational belief system that has grown as it has been passed down. It’s a bit like the global warming hockey stick in its effect though, where it really kicks in at the end.

These women are extremists and they are serious about what they want. You only have to look at the recent case of Mark Pearson to see the nature of the beast.

So, what have men done?

We’ve behaved like men of course. There appears to be a problem here, let’s try and work this out. So some of us look at what we already know. One guy trots off and has a look at Roman history, another the mating habits of monkeys. Then some men get a bit more contemporary and look at Father’s After Divorce (which is the title of a book). Another group of men buy into the emotionally illiterate concept, and run self discovery programmes for lost men.

Yes, we are all doing something about it.

While all this is going on, what we’re not doing is examining the source of the problem. We’re blind to the fact that it is not ‘our problem’ but we are the intended victims.

In a military sense, it’s like men shooting each other, because the enemy is shooting at us. Our response is not verging on stupidity – it is stupidity.

The first thing we have to acknowledge as men, is that we got conned. We took this hook line and sinker. We got strategically dismantled, gradually isolated from each other, while at the same time, the propaganda machine filled the heads of ordinary decent women with Feminist tripe, and turned the ‘compatible one’ into unequal genders.

That is our starting point. If we want to stop this rubbish, we need to go to the source of the problem. Then we need to behave like men.

Analyse it.
Understand it.
Explain it.
Fix it.

Flat-line Editing


  1. Not a badly written essay as far as mechanics go. However, an F is inevitable as nowhere do you define what you believe to be “a man”.

    Comment by Prof A — Thu 3rd March 2016 @ 11:03 am

  2. Nice post. It is interesting now that only 25% of women in America subscribe to feminism. One of the most absurd ideas behind second and third wave feminism is that it relies on accepting that gender is a social construct and not biologically determined. This paradigm can only be sustained through totalitarianism under which both women and men suffer. Women suffer because they are constantly told that their nature needs to be suppressed. They should not respond to maternal drives, they need to be aggressive in order to get ahead, never lower themselves to ‘just’ taking care of children… the list goes on. Men have also been systematically conned under this ideology by generally being told to hate everything about their nature. Without the feminized education system, government and now corporate institutions sustaining this ideology, this underlying falsehood cannot survive. The ideology underpinning the house of cards on which feminism is built and attacking this is going to get support from both men and women. The fight is not only something men are interested in starting, women too have a stake. If you are a religious person, a scientific person or somewhere in between, the idea that gender is only a social construct is such an easy target. Not a single one of Gods creatures (for the religious) was created without a determined role, not a single species in the evolutionary model evolved without determined roles. Equally important, Yes. One superior or entitled to institutional protection through special rights. No!

    Comment by GIJoe — Thu 3rd March 2016 @ 11:18 am

  3. nowhere do you define what you believe to be ‘a man’

    I’m not a feminist. The man defines himself, provided society protects his freedom.

    Feminists constantly define the man – they want the compliant fool.

    Comment by Downunder — Thu 3rd March 2016 @ 12:09 pm

  4. Thanks GIJoe

    The fight is not only something men are interested in starting, women too have a stake.

    People do want to push back against this, that’s what I think too. The Western World has had enough of this.

    Change like progress can be a struggle.

    Comment by Downunder — Thu 3rd March 2016 @ 12:31 pm

  5. Last year I was Lecturing at a university in the Middle East. I contacted the NZ embassy and shortly thereafter previously well behaved female students began aggressively trying to order me – insane.

    Comment by Peadar — Mon 7th March 2016 @ 12:48 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please note that comments which do not conform with the rules of this site are likely to be removed. They should be on-topic for the page they are on. Discussions about moderation are specifically forbidden. All spam will be deleted within a few hours and blacklisted on the stopforumspam database.

This site is cached. Comments will not appear immediately unless you are logged in. Please do not make multiple attempts.

Skip to toolbar